BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22538374)

  • 1. Examining auditory kappa effects through manipulating intensity differences between sequential tones.
    Alards-Tomalin D; Leboe-McGowan LC; Mondor TA
    Psychol Res; 2013 Jul; 77(4):480-91. PubMed ID: 22538374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative contribution of pitch and brightness to the auditory kappa effect.
    Marty N; Marty M; Pfeuty M
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):55-67. PubMed ID: 31440814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Temporal integration affects intensity change detection in human auditory cortex.
    Soeta Y; Nakagawa S
    Neuroreport; 2010 Dec; 21(18):1157-61. PubMed ID: 20938362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Illusory conjunctions of pitch and duration in unfamiliar tone sequences.
    Thompson WF; Hall MD; Pressing J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Feb; 27(1):128-40. PubMed ID: 11248928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Avoidance learning facilitates temporal processing in the primary auditory cortex.
    Leon MI; Poytress BS; Weinberger NM
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2008 Sep; 90(2):347-57. PubMed ID: 18603453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of intensity accents on the detection of interonset interval variations.
    Lai Y; Yao D
    Neuroreport; 2011 Oct; 22(15):749-52. PubMed ID: 21876466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pitch and loudness information encoded in auditory imagery as revealed by event-related potentials.
    Wu J; Yu Z; Mai X; Wei J; Luo Y
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Mar; 48(3):415-9. PubMed ID: 20636291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are auditory percepts determined by experience?
    Monson BB; Han S; Purves D
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(5):e63728. PubMed ID: 23667666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sequential grouping modulates the effect of non-simultaneous masking on auditory intensity resolution.
    Oberfeld D; Stahn P
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e48054. PubMed ID: 23110174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Independent effects of temporal expectation and stimulus intensity in audition.
    Schnuerch R; Kreitz C; Lange K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Oct; 75(7):1520-32. PubMed ID: 23757047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Atypical pattern of discriminating sound features in adults with Asperger syndrome as reflected by the mismatch negativity.
    Kujala T; Aho E; Lepistö T; Jansson-Verkasalo E; Nieminen-von Wendt T; von Wendt L; Näätänen R
    Biol Psychol; 2007 Apr; 75(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 17257732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Division of labor between left and right human auditory cortices during the processing of intensity and duration.
    Angenstein N; Brechmann A
    Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():1-11. PubMed ID: 23831528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Manipulating number generation: loud + long = large?
    Heinemann A; Pfister R; Janczyk M
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Dec; 22(4):1332-9. PubMed ID: 24076426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. No time-stretching illusion when a tone is followed by a noise.
    Kuroda T; Grondin S
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1811-6. PubMed ID: 24027030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The interdependence of pitch and temporal judgments by absolute pitch possessors.
    Shigeno S
    Percept Psychophys; 1993 Nov; 54(5):682-92. PubMed ID: 8290337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of intensity upon pitch perception in cochlear implant recipients.
    Arnoldner C; Kaider A; Hamzavi J
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Oct; 116(10):1760-5. PubMed ID: 17003738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of an imputed pitch velocity model of the auditory kappa effect.
    Henry MJ; McAuley JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Apr; 35(2):551-64. PubMed ID: 19331507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Amplitude modulation reduces loudness adaptation to high-frequency tones.
    Wynne DP; George SE; Zeng FG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):279-83. PubMed ID: 26233027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of forward masking on intensity discrimination, frequency discrimination, and the detection of tones in noise.
    Carlyon RP; Beveridge HA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 May; 93(5):2886-95. PubMed ID: 8315152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Dynamic frequency change influences loudness perception: a central, analytic process.
    Neuhoff JG; McBeath MK; Wanzie WC
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1999 Aug; 25(4):1050-9. PubMed ID: 10464944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.