These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
43. On estimation of linkage test power. Ginsburg EK; Axenovich TI; Goodman DW Genet Epidemiol; 1996; 13(4):355-65. PubMed ID: 8894638 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components. Visscher PM Twin Res Hum Genet; 2006 Aug; 9(4):490-5. PubMed ID: 16899155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Maximum likelihood vs. minimum chi-square--a general comparison with applications to the estimation of recombination fractions in two-point linkage analysis. Hühn M Genome; 2000 Oct; 43(5):853-6. PubMed ID: 11081976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Reconsidering the asymptotic null distribution of likelihood ratio tests for genetic linkage in multivariate variance components models under complete pleiotropy. Han SS; Chang JT Biostatistics; 2010 Apr; 11(2):226-41. PubMed ID: 20029057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Statistical analysis of crossover interference using the chi-square model. Zhao H; Speed TP; McPeek MS Genetics; 1995 Feb; 139(2):1045-56. PubMed ID: 7713407 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Linkage detection under heterogeneity and the mixture problem. Chiano MN; Yates JR Ann Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 59(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 7762986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A likelihood approach to calculating risk support intervals. Leal SM; Ott J Am J Hum Genet; 1994 May; 54(5):913-7. PubMed ID: 8178830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. The linkage detection problem. Edwards JH Ann Hum Genet; 1990 Jul; 54(3):253-75. PubMed ID: 2221827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Sample size requirement for detecting interference under the chi-square model. Lin S Hum Hered; 2001; 52(4):201-9. PubMed ID: 11713416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Linkage analysis on complex pedigrees by simulation. Thomas A IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1994; 11(2):79-93. PubMed ID: 8089591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Trials, tribulations, and triumphs of the EM algorithm in pedigree analysis. Weeks DE; Lange K IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1989; 6(4):209-32. PubMed ID: 2577997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Estimation of the recombination fraction in human pedigrees: efficient computation of the likelihood for human linkage studies. Ott J Am J Hum Genet; 1974 Sep; 26(5):588-97. PubMed ID: 4422075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Noncentral Chi-Square Versus Normal Distributions in Describing the Likelihood Ratio Statistic: The Univariate Case and Its Multivariate Implication. Yuan KH Multivariate Behav Res; 2008; 43(1):109-36. PubMed ID: 26788974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. On pseudolikelihood inference for semiparametric models with boundary problems. Chen Y; Ning J; Ning Y; Liang KY; Bandeen-Roche K Biometrika; 2017 Mar; 104(1):165-179. PubMed ID: 29430029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Normal Versus Noncentral Chi-square Asymptotics of Misspecified Models. Chun SY; Shapiro A Multivariate Behav Res; 2009 Nov; 44(6):803-27. PubMed ID: 26801797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. On the asymptotic behaviour of the pseudolikelihood ratio test statistic with boundary problems. Chen Y; Liang KY Biometrika; 2010 Sep; 97(3):603-620. PubMed ID: 22822249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A Study of the Sampling Variability and z-Values of Parameter Estimates From Misspecified Structural Equation Models. Kaplan D Multivariate Behav Res; 1989 Jan; 24(1):41-57. PubMed ID: 26794295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]