These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22539949)

  • 21. An empirical demonstration of the effect of study design on density estimations.
    Nawaz MA; Khan BU; Mahmood A; Younas M; Din JU; Sutherland C
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jun; 11(1):13104. PubMed ID: 34162926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A spatial capture-recapture model for group-living species.
    Emmet RL; Augustine BC; Abrahms B; Rich LN; Gardner B
    Ecology; 2022 Oct; 103(10):e3576. PubMed ID: 34714927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Spatial correlation structures for detections of individuals in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Stevenson BC; Fewster RM; Sharma K
    Biometrics; 2022 Sep; 78(3):963-973. PubMed ID: 34051114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Optimizing the size of the area surveyed for monitoring a Eurasian lynx (Lynx lynx) population in the Swiss Alps by means of photographic capture-recapture.
    Zimmermann F; Breitenmoser-Würsten C; Molinari-Jobin A; Breitenmoser U
    Integr Zool; 2013 Sep; 8(3):232-43. PubMed ID: 24020463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of pack density in grey wolf (
    Mattioli L; Canu A; Passilongo D; Scandura M; Apollonio M
    Front Zool; 2018; 15():38. PubMed ID: 30305834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Using Continuous-Time Spatial Capture-Recapture models to make inference about animal activity patterns.
    Distiller GB; Borchers DL; Foster RJ; Harmsen BJ
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Oct; 10(20):e6822. PubMed ID: 33145005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Spatial capture--recapture models for jointly estimating population density and landscape connectivity.
    Royle JA; Chandler RB; Gazenski KD; Graves TA
    Ecology; 2013 Feb; 94(2):287-94. PubMed ID: 23691647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Occupancy data improves parameter precision in spatial capture-recapture models.
    Jiménez J; Díaz-Ruiz F; Monterroso P; Tobajas J; Ferreras P
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Aug; 12(8):e9250. PubMed ID: 36052294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A local evaluation of the individual state-space to scale up Bayesian spatial capture-recapture.
    Milleret C; Dupont P; Bonenfant C; Brøseth H; Flagstad Ø; Sutherland C; Bischof R
    Ecol Evol; 2019 Jan; 9(1):352-363. PubMed ID: 30680119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of social organization, trap arrangement and density, sampling scale, and population density on bias in population size estimation using some common mark-recapture estimators.
    Gupta M; Joshi A; Vidya TN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173609. PubMed ID: 28306735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. An empirical evaluation of camera trapping and spatially explicit capture-recapture models for estimating chimpanzee density.
    Després-Einspenner ML; Howe EJ; Drapeau P; Kühl HS
    Am J Primatol; 2017 Jul; 79(7):. PubMed ID: 28267880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Using bear rub data and spatial capture-recapture models to estimate trend in a brown bear population.
    Kendall KC; Graves TA; Royle JA; Macleod AC; McKelvey KS; Boulanger J; Waller JS
    Sci Rep; 2019 Nov; 9(1):16804. PubMed ID: 31727927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Experimental evaluation of spatial capture-recapture study design.
    Fleming J; Grant EHC; Sterrett SC; Sutherland C
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02419. PubMed ID: 34278637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does the punishment fit the crime? Consequences and diagnosis of misspecified detection functions in Bayesian spatial capture-recapture modeling.
    Dey S; Bischof R; Dupont PPA; Milleret C
    Ecol Evol; 2022 Feb; 12(2):e8600. PubMed ID: 35222967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimal sampling design for spatial capture-recapture.
    Dupont G; Royle JA; Nawaz MA; Sutherland C
    Ecology; 2021 Mar; 102(3):e03262. PubMed ID: 33244753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Incorporating citizen science data in spatially explicit integrated population models.
    Sun CC; Royle JA; Fuller AK
    Ecology; 2019 Sep; 100(9):e02777. PubMed ID: 31168779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Data integration for inference about spatial processes: A model-based approach to test and account for data inconsistency.
    Tenan S; Pedrini P; Bragalanti N; Groff C; Sutherland C
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0185588. PubMed ID: 28973034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimating animal abundance at multiple scales by spatially explicit capture-recapture.
    Howe EJ; Potter D; Beauclerc KB; Jackson KE; Northrup JM
    Ecol Appl; 2022 Oct; 32(7):e2638. PubMed ID: 35441452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Testing the precision and sensitivity of density estimates obtained with a camera-trap method revealed limitations and opportunities.
    Pettigrew P; Sigouin D; St-Laurent MH
    Ecol Evol; 2021 Jun; 11(12):7879-7889. PubMed ID: 34188858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Estimating the density of small mammals using the selfie trap is an effective camera trapping method.
    Gracanin A; Minchinton TE; Mikac KM
    Mamm Res; 2022; 67(4):467-482. PubMed ID: 35891629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.