200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22540325)
1. Commercially pure titanium implants with surfaces modified by laser beam with and without chemical deposition of apatite. Biomechanical and topographical analysis in rabbits.
Queiroz TP; Souza FÁ; Guastaldi AC; Margonar R; Garcia-Júnior IR; Hochuli-Vieira E
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24(8):896-903. PubMed ID: 22540325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo evaluation of cp Ti implants with modified surfaces by laser beam with and without hydroxyapatite chemical deposition and without and with thermal treatment: topographic characterization and histomorphometric analysis in rabbits.
Queiroz TP; de Molon RS; Souza FÁ; Margonar R; Thomazini AH; Guastaldi AC; Hochuli-Vieira E
Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Mar; 21(2):685-699. PubMed ID: 27530186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surface and biomechanical study of titanium implants modified by laser with and without hydroxyapatite coating, in rabbits.
Sisti KE; de Rossi R; Antoniolli AM; Aydos RD; Guastaldi AC; Queiroz TP; Garcia IR; Piattelli A; Tavares HS
J Oral Implantol; 2012 Jun; 38(3):231-7. PubMed ID: 20690851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biological performance of chemical hydroxyapatite coating associated with implant surface modification by laser beam: biomechanical study in rabbit tibias.
Faeda RS; Tavares HS; Sartori R; Guastaldi AC; Marcantonio E
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1706-15. PubMed ID: 19615586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo comparison of bone formation on titanium implant surfaces coated with biomimetically deposited calcium phosphate or electrochemically deposited hydroxyapatite.
Yang GL; He FM; Song E; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 20657861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomedical Ti-Mo alloys with surface machined and modified by laser beam: biomechanical, histological, and histometric analysis in rabbits.
Oliveira NT; Guastaldi FP; Perrotti V; Hochuli-Vieira E; Guastaldi AC; Piattelli A; Iezzi G
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):427-37. PubMed ID: 21554530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of hydroxyapatite nanocrystals on early bone formation surrounding dental implants.
Svanborg LM; Hoffman M; Andersson M; Currie F; Kjellin P; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 40(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 21111575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydroxyapatite and collagen combination-coated dental implants display better bone formation in the peri-implant area than the same combination plus bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated implants, hydroxyapatite only coated implants, and uncoated implants.
Lee SW; Hahn BD; Kang TY; Lee MJ; Choi JY; Kim MK; Kim SG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Jan; 72(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 24331565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histomorphometric analysis of hydroxyapatite-coated implants in rabbit cortical bone using longitudinal and transverse histologic sections.
Rebollal J; Soares Gde A; Vidigal GM
Implant Dent; 2010 Apr; 19(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 20386217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early bone healing around 2 different experimental, HA grit-blasted, and dual acid-etched titanium implant surfaces. A pilot study in rabbits.
Gobbato L; Arguello E; Martin IS; Hawley CE; Griffin TJ
Implant Dent; 2012 Dec; 21(6):454-60. PubMed ID: 23149502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Osseointegration evaluation of laser-deposited titanium dioxide nanoparticles on commercially pure titanium dental implants.
Azzawi ZGM; Hamad TI; Kadhim SA; Naji GA
J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2018 Jun; 29(7):96. PubMed ID: 29946975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative in vivo study of commercially pure Ti implants with surfaces modified by laser with and without silicate deposition: biomechanical and scanning electron microscopy analysis.
Souza FA; Queiroz TP; Guastaldi AC; Garcia-Júnior IR; Magro-Filho O; Nishioka RS; Sisti KE; Sonoda CK
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2013 Jan; 101(1):76-84. PubMed ID: 23090936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between bioactive fluoride modified and bioinert anodically oxidized implant surfaces in early bone response using rabbit tibia model.
Choi JY; Lee HJ; Jang JU; Yeo IS
Implant Dent; 2012 Apr; 21(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 22382750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of ion beam-assisted deposition of hydroxyapatite on the osseointegration of endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Jung YC; Han CH; Lee IS; Kim HE
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(6):809-18. PubMed ID: 11769831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Histologic comparison of a thermal dual-etched implant surface to machined, TPS, and HA surfaces: bone contact in vivo in rabbits.
London RM; Roberts FA; Baker DA; Rohrer MD; O'Neal RB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 12074452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
