176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22540771)
1. Comparison of photographic and visual assessment of occlusal caries with histology as the reference standard.
Boye U; Walsh T; Pretty IA; Tickle M
BMC Oral Health; 2012 Apr; 12():10. PubMed ID: 22540771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of an intra-oral photographic caries assessment with an established visual caries assessment method for use in dental epidemiological studies of children.
Boye U; Willasey A; Walsh T; Tickle M; Pretty IA
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2013 Dec; 41(6):526-33. PubMed ID: 23566100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical performance of two fluorescence-based methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions in primary teeth.
Matos R; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Siqueira WL; Duarte DA; Mendes FM
Caries Res; 2011; 45(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 21625126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The performance of conventional and fluorescence-based methods for occlusal caries detection: an in vivo study with histologic validation.
Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Santos-Pinto L; Lussi A; Cordeiro RC
J Am Dent Assoc; 2012 Apr; 143(4):339-50. PubMed ID: 22467694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of caries detection methods using varying numbers of intra-oral digital photographs with visual examination for epidemiology in children.
Boye U; Pretty IA; Tickle M; Walsh T
BMC Oral Health; 2013 Jan; 13():6. PubMed ID: 23312001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Occlusal caries: Evaluation of direct microscopy versus digital imaging used for two histological classification systems.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Ricketts DN; Stachniss V; Maschka R; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Pieper K
J Dent; 2009 Mar; 37(3):204-11. PubMed ID: 19124186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The assessment of an intra-oral video camera as an aid to occlusal caries detection.
Forgie AH; Pine CM; Pitts NB
Int Dent J; 2003 Feb; 53(1):3-6. PubMed ID: 12653332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Stachniss V; Ricketts DN; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Pieper K
Caries Res; 2008; 42(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 18204251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The assessment of unaided visual examination, intraoral camera and operating microscope for the detection of occlusal caries lesions.
Erten H; Uçtasli MB; Akarslan ZZ; Uzun O; Baspinar E
Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 15853104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods.
Attrill DC; Ashley PF
Br Dent J; 2001 Apr; 190(8):440-3. PubMed ID: 11352392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In vitro evaluation of ICDAS and radiographic examination of occlusal surfaces and their association with treatment decisions.
Diniz MB; Lima LM; Eckert G; Zandona AG; Cordeiro RC; Pinto LS
Oper Dent; 2011; 36(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 21777096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro performance of different methods in detecting occlusal caries lesions.
Gomez J; Zakian C; Salsone S; Pinto SC; Taylor A; Pretty IA; Ellwood R
J Dent; 2013 Feb; 41(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 23146817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of visual inspection, radiographic examination, laser fluorescence and their combinations on treatment decisions for occlusal surfaces.
Valera FB; Pessan JP; Valera RC; Mondelli J; Percinoto C
Am J Dent; 2008 Feb; 21(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 18435372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is it feasible to use smartphone images to perform telediagnosis of different stages of occlusal caries lesions?
Kohara EK; Abdala CG; Novaes TF; Braga MM; Haddad AE; Mendes FM
PLoS One; 2018; 13(9):e0202116. PubMed ID: 30188900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of the ICDAS system and two fluorescence-based intraoral devices for examination of occlusal surfaces.
Theocharopoulou A; Lagerweij MD; van Strijp AJ
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2015 Mar; 16(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 25793954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Performance of a fluorescence camera for detection of occlusal caries in vitro.
Jablonski-Momeni A; Schipper HM; Rosen SM; Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M; Roggendorf MJ; Stoll R; Stachniss V; Pieper K
Odontology; 2011 Jan; 99(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 21271327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validity of scoring caries and primary molar hypomineralization (DMH) on intraoral photographs.
Elfrink ME; Veerkamp JS; Aartman IH; Moll HA; Ten Cate JM
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2009 Nov; 10 Suppl 1():5-10. PubMed ID: 19863892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic performance of the visual caries classification system ICDAS II versus radiography and micro-computed tomography for proximal caries detection: an in vitro study.
Mitropoulos P; Rahiotis C; Stamatakis H; Kakaboura A
J Dent; 2010 Nov; 38(11):859-67. PubMed ID: 20654681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparing the outcomes of gold-standard dental examinations with photographic screening by mid-level dental providers.
Park JS; Kruger E; Nicholls W; Estai M; Winters J; Tennant M
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 May; 23(5):2383-2387. PubMed ID: 30302610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Variables affecting the inter- and intra-examiner reliability of ICDAS for occlusal caries diagnosis in permanent molars.
Qudeimat MA; Alomari QD; Altarakemah Y; Alshawaf N; Honkala EJ
J Public Health Dent; 2016; 76(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 26095924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
