These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22541313)

  • 1. Systematic reviews for informing rehabilitation practice: an introduction.
    Dijkers MP; Bushnik T; Heinemann AW; Heller T; Libin AV; Starks J; Sherer M; Vandergoot D
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 May; 93(5):912-8. PubMed ID: 22541313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Systematic reviews for evidence-based management: how to find them and what to do with them.
    Chan KS; Morton SC; Shekelle PG
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Nov; 10(11 Pt 1):806-12. PubMed ID: 15623270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management, part I: introduction and general considerations.
    Manchikanti L
    Pain Physician; 2008; 11(2):161-86. PubMed ID: 18354710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: news from the 4th Issue 2008.
    Zaina F
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Mar; 45(1):93-101. PubMed ID: 19293757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using evidence in pain practice: Part II: Interpreting and applying systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines.
    Chou R
    Pain Med; 2008; 9(5):531-41. PubMed ID: 18346061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Finding and evaluating renal evidence: bridging the knowledge gap.
    Bejaimal SA; Haynes RB; Shariff S; Garg AX
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2012 Jan; 19(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 22364795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
    Kranke P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Neonatal neurology decision-making starting from systematic reviews of Cochrane Collaboration].
    González de Dios J
    Rev Neurol; 2005 Apr 16-30; 40(8):453-9. PubMed ID: 15861325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Rapid reviews for evidence-based decision support. (Restricting) requirements].
    Ziegler S; Lühmann D; Raspe H; Windeler J
    Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 2001 Feb; 95(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 11268875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. EJPRM systematic continuous update on Cochrane reviews in rehabilitation: news from the 3rd Issue 2009.
    Zaina F; Negrini S
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2009 Dec; 45(4):605-19. PubMed ID: 20032920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Systematic reviews of surgical interventions.
    Burton M; Clarke M
    Surg Clin North Am; 2006 Feb; 86(1):101-14, ix. PubMed ID: 16442423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessing applicability when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program.
    Atkins D; Chang SM; Gartlehner G; Buckley DI; Whitlock EP; Berliner E; Matchar D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1198-207. PubMed ID: 21463926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Occupational health systematic reviews: An overview.
    Schonstein E; Verbeek JH
    Work; 2006; 26(3):255-8. PubMed ID: 16720965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Systematic reviews of economic evaluations: utility or futility?
    Anderson R
    Health Econ; 2010 Mar; 19(3):350-64. PubMed ID: 19378354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A description of the trials, reviews, and practice guidelines indexed in the PEDro database.
    Maher CG; Moseley AM; Sherrington C; Elkins MR; Herbert RD
    Phys Ther; 2008 Sep; 88(9):1068-77. PubMed ID: 18635670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Capture-mark-recapture as a tool for estimating the number of articles available for systematic reviews in critical care medicine.
    Lane D; Dykeman J; Ferri M; Goldsmith CH; Stelfox HT
    J Crit Care; 2013 Aug; 28(4):469-75. PubMed ID: 23312123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide.
    Pai M; McCulloch M; Gorman JD; Pai N; Enanoria W; Kennedy G; Tharyan P; Colford JM
    Natl Med J India; 2004; 17(2):86-95. PubMed ID: 15141602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Promoting development and use of systematic reviews in a developing country.
    Yousefi-Nooraie R; Rashidian A; Nedjat S; Majdzadeh R; Mortaz-Hedjri S; Etemadi A; Salmasian H
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1029-34. PubMed ID: 20367702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Systematic reviews: a cross-sectional study of location and citation counts.
    Montori VM; Wilczynski NL; Morgan D; Haynes RB;
    BMC Med; 2003 Nov; 1():2. PubMed ID: 14633274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.