These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22541912)
1. Acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a comparative biomechanical study of three techniques. Lädermann A; Gueorguiev B; Stimec B; Fasel J; Rothstock S; Hoffmeyer P J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Feb; 22(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 22541912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction. Mazzocca AD; Santangelo SA; Johnson ST; Rios CG; Dumonski ML; Arciero RA Am J Sports Med; 2006 Feb; 34(2):236-46. PubMed ID: 16282577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of 3 stabilization methods on acromioclavicular joint dislocations. Nüchtern JV; Sellenschloh K; Bishop N; Jauch S; Briem D; Hoffmann M; Lehmann W; Pueschel K; Morlock MM; Rueger JM; Großterlinden LG Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jun; 41(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 23618701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Acromioclavicular joint dislocations: coracoclavicular reconstruction with and without additional direct acromioclavicular repair. Weiser L; Nüchtern JV; Sellenschloh K; Püschel K; Morlock MM; Rueger JM; Hoffmann M; Lehmann W; Großterlinden LG Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2017 Jul; 25(7):2025-2031. PubMed ID: 26685688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The anatomic reconstruction of acromioclavicular joint dislocations using 2 TightRope devices: a biomechanical study. Walz L; Salzmann GM; Fabbro T; Eichhorn S; Imhoff AB Am J Sports Med; 2008 Dec; 36(12):2398-406. PubMed ID: 18765674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Single- Versus Double-Tunnel Coracoclavicular Ligament Reconstruction With Acromioclavicular Stabilization for Acromioclavicular Joint Injuries. Banffy MB; Uquillas C; Neumann JA; ElAttrache NS Am J Sports Med; 2018 Apr; 46(5):1070-1076. PubMed ID: 29438625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical evaluation of the acromioclavicular capsular ligaments and reconstruction with an intramedullary free tissue graft. Freedman JA; Adamson GJ; Bui C; Lee TQ Am J Sports Med; 2010 May; 38(5):958-64. PubMed ID: 20139471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical Comparison of Anatomic and Extra-Anatomic Reconstruction Techniques Using Local Grafts for Chronic Instability of the Acromioclavicular Joint. Le Hanneur M; Thoreson A; Delgrande D; Lafosse T; Werthel JD; Hardy P; Elhassan B Am J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 46(8):1927-1935. PubMed ID: 29746150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. TightRope versus fiber mesh tape augmentation of acromioclavicular joint reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Zooker CC; Parks BG; White KL; Hinton RY Am J Sports Med; 2010 Jun; 38(6):1204-8. PubMed ID: 20392969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopic repairs for acromioclavicular joint instability: suture button systems without biological augmentation. Beitzel K; Obopilwe E; Chowaniec DM; Niver GE; Nowak MD; Hanypsiak BT; Guerra JJ; Arciero RA; Mazzocca AD Am J Sports Med; 2011 Oct; 39(10):2218-25. PubMed ID: 21841067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of acromioclavicular joint dislocation repair using coracoclavicular suspension devices in two different configurations. Abat F; Sarasquete J; Natera LG; Calvo Á; Pérez-España M; Zurita N; Ferrer J; del Real JC; Paz-Jimenez E; Forriol F J Orthop Traumatol; 2015 Sep; 16(3):215-9. PubMed ID: 25740565 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The biomechanical stability of distal clavicle excision versus symmetric acromioclavicular joint resection. Pandhi NG; Esquivel AO; Hanna JD; Lemos DW; Staron JS; Lemos SE Am J Sports Med; 2013 Feb; 41(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 23271005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel reverse coracoacromial ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint separation. Shu B; Johnston T; Lindsey DP; McAdams TR Am J Sports Med; 2012 Feb; 40(2):440-6. PubMed ID: 22085727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Synthetic coracoclavicular ligament vs. coracoclavicular suspensory construct for treatment of acromioclavicular dislocation: a biomechanical study. Lobao MH; Canham RB; Melvani RT; Parks BG; Murthi AM J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Jul; 29(7):1440-1449. PubMed ID: 32081633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical evaluation of native acromioclavicular joint ligaments and two reconstruction techniques in the presence of the sternoclavicular joint: A cadaver study. Masionis P; Šatkauskas I; Mikelevičius V; Ryliškis S; Bučinskas V; Griškevičius J; Martin Oliva X; Monzó Planella M; Porvaneckas N; Uvarovas V J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(3):2309499017730424. PubMed ID: 28946836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical analysis of distal clavicle excision with acromioclavicular joint reconstruction. Beaver AB; Parks BG; Hinton RY Am J Sports Med; 2013 Jul; 41(7):1684-8. PubMed ID: 23698388 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Arthroscopically assisted stabilization of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint separations in a coracoclavicular Double-TightRope technique: V-shaped versus parallel drill hole orientation. Kraus N; Haas NP; Scheibel M; Gerhardt C Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2013 Oct; 133(10):1431-40. PubMed ID: 23843136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Functional evaluation of the ligaments at the acromioclavicular joint during anteroposterior and superoinferior translation. Lee KW; Debski RE; Chen CH; Woo SL; Fu FH Am J Sports Med; 1997; 25(6):858-62. PubMed ID: 9397278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Acromioclavicular stability: a biomechanical comparison of acromioplasty to acromioplasty with coplaning of the distal clavicle. Edwards SG Arthroscopy; 2003 Dec; 19(10):1079-84. PubMed ID: 14673449 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]