These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22542048)
1. The emerging role of cardiac computed tomography for the assessment of coronary perfusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tashakkor AY; Nicolaou S; Leipsic J; Mancini GB Can J Cardiol; 2012; 28(4):413-22. PubMed ID: 22542048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Adenosine-stress low-dose single-scan CT myocardial perfusion imaging using a 128-slice dual-source CT: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Choo KS; Hwangbo L; Kim JH; Park YH; Kim JS; Kim J; Chun KJ; Jeong DW; Lim SJ Acta Radiol; 2013 May; 54(4):389-95. PubMed ID: 23550182 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Performance of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Computed Tomography Perfusion, and Computed Tomography-Fractional Flow Reserve in Functional Myocardial Ischemia Assessment Versus Invasive Fractional Flow Reserve. Gonzalez JA; Lipinski MJ; Flors L; Shaw PW; Kramer CM; Salerno M Am J Cardiol; 2015 Nov; 116(9):1469-78. PubMed ID: 26347004 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic Performance of First-Pass Myocardial Perfusion Imaging without Stress with Computed Tomography (CT) Compared with Coronary CT Angiography Alone, with Fractional Flow Reserve as the Reference Standard. Osawa K; Miyoshi T; Miki T; Koyama Y; Sato S; Kanazawa S; Ito H PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0149170. PubMed ID: 26894686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Combined CT coronary angiography and stress myocardial perfusion imaging for hemodynamically significant stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leung M; Meredith IT; Leong DP; Antonis PR; Crossett M; Troupis J; Harper R; Malaiapan Y; Seneviratne SK JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Nov; 5(11):1097-111. PubMed ID: 23153909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging in patients considered for revascularization: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Ko BS; Cameron JD; Meredith IT; Leung M; Antonis PR; Nasis A; Crossett M; Hope SA; Lehman SJ; Troupis J; DeFrance T; Seneviratne SK Eur Heart J; 2012 Jan; 33(1):67-77. PubMed ID: 21810860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of computed tomography-derived fractional flow reserve using reduced-order modelling and static computed tomography stress myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically significant coronary stenosis. Ihdayhid AR; Sakaguchi T; Linde JJ; Sørgaard MH; Kofoed KF; Fujisawa Y; Hislop-Jambrich J; Nerlekar N; Cameron JD; Munnur RK; Crosset M; Wong DTL; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1234-1243. PubMed ID: 30137268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adenosine stress high-pitch 128-slice dual-source myocardial computed tomography perfusion for imaging of reversible myocardial ischemia: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging. Feuchtner G; Goetti R; Plass A; Wieser M; Scheffel H; Wyss C; Stolzmann P; Donati O; Schnabl J; Falk V; Alkadhi H; Leschka S; Cury RC Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 Sep; 4(5):540-9. PubMed ID: 21862731 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion by computed tomography in the identification of flow-limiting stenosis - The CORE320 study: An integrated analysis of CT coronary angiography and myocardial perfusion. Magalhães TA; Kishi S; George RT; Arbab-Zadeh A; Vavere AL; Cox C; Matheson MB; Miller JM; Brinker J; Di Carli M; Rybicki FJ; Rochitte CE; Clouse ME; Lima JA J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):438-45. PubMed ID: 25977111 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Stress and rest dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging by evaluation of complete time-attenuation curves with dual-source CT. Ho KT; Chua KC; Klotz E; Panknin C JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Aug; 3(8):811-20. PubMed ID: 20705260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of simultaneous evaluation of coronary arteries and myocardial perfusion with single stress cardiac computed tomography acquisition compared to invasive coronary angiography plus invasive fractional flow reserve. Pontone G; Baggiano A; Andreini D; Guaricci AI; Guglielmo M; Muscogiuri G; Fusini L; Soldi M; Del Torto A; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Calligaris G; De Martini S; Ferrari C; Galli S; Grancini L; Olivares P; Ravagnani P; Teruzzi G; Trabattoni D; Fabbiocchi F; Montorsi P; Rabbat MG; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M Int J Cardiol; 2018 Dec; 273():263-268. PubMed ID: 30268383 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transluminal attenuation gradient in coronary computed tomography angiography is a novel noninvasive approach to the identification of functionally significant coronary artery stenosis: a comparison with fractional flow reserve. Wong DT; Ko BS; Cameron JD; Nerlekar N; Leung MC; Malaiapan Y; Crossett M; Leong DP; Worthley SG; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Mar; 61(12):1271-9. PubMed ID: 23414792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Fractional flow reserve calculation from 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography and TIMI frame count: a fast computer model to quantify the functional significance of moderately obstructed coronary arteries. Tu S; Barbato E; Köszegi Z; Yang J; Sun Z; Holm NR; Tar B; Li Y; Rusinaru D; Wijns W; Reiber JH JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Jul; 7(7):768-77. PubMed ID: 25060020 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol. Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Rationale and design of advantage (additional diagnostic value of CT perfusion over coronary CT angiography in stented patients with suspected in-stent restenosis or coronary artery disease progression) prospective study. Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Pontone G; Conte E; Sonck J; Collet C; Guglielmo M; Baggiano A; Trabattoni D; Galli S; Montorsi P; Ferrari C; Fabbiocchi F; De Martini S; Annoni A; Mancini ME; Formenti A; Magatelli M; Resta M; Consiglio E; Muscogiuri G; Fiorentini C; Bartorelli AL; Pepi M J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2018; 12(5):411-417. PubMed ID: 29933938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT-based myocardial ischemia evaluation: quantitative angiography, transluminal attenuation gradient, myocardial perfusion, and CT-derived fractional flow reserve. Koo HJ; Yang DH; Kim YH; Kang JW; Kang SJ; Kweon J; Kim HJ; Lim TH Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jun; 32 Suppl 1():1-19. PubMed ID: 26667445 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of combined assessment using adenosine stress computed tomography perfusion + computed tomography angiography with transluminal attenuation gradient + computed tomography angiography against invasive fractional flow reserve. Wong DT; Ko BS; Cameron JD; Leong DP; Leung MC; Malaiapan Y; Nerlekar N; Crossett M; Troupis J; Meredith IT; Seneviratne SK J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 May; 63(18):1904-12. PubMed ID: 24657696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Single-phase coronary artery CT angiography extracted from stress dynamic myocardial CT perfusion on third-generation dual-source CT: Validation by coronary angiography. Yi Y; Wu W; Lin L; Zhang HZ; Qian H; Shen ZJ; Wang Y; Jin ZY; Litt H; Wang YN Int J Cardiol; 2018 Oct; 269():343-349. PubMed ID: 30224034 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epicardial adipose tissue and myocardial ischemia assessed by computed tomography perfusion imaging and invasive fractional flow reserve. Muthalaly RG; Nerlekar N; Wong DT; Cameron JD; Seneviratne SK; Ko BS J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2017; 11(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 28089233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]