BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22542135)

  • 1. Determining the optimal inner air cell pressure for the effective reduction of interface pressure.
    Sasaki N; Nakagami G; Sakai K; Yamamoto Y; Kato H; Nanjo Y; Sanada H
    J Tissue Viability; 2012 May; 21(2):47-53. PubMed ID: 22542135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurements of interface pressure between body sites and the surfaces of four specialised air mattresses.
    Allen V; Ryan DW; Murray A
    Br J Clin Pract; 1994; 48(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 8031686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quantification of pressure relief using interface pressure and tissue perfusion in alternating pressure air mattresses.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2000 Oct; 81(10):1364-9. PubMed ID: 11030502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The physiological response of skin tissues to alternating support pressures in able-bodied subjects.
    Chai CY; Bader DL
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2013 Dec; 28():427-35. PubMed ID: 23791952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Interface pressure measurements of support surfaces with subjects in the supine and 45-degree Fowler positions.
    Whittemore R; Bautista C; Smith C; Bruttomesso K
    J ET Nurs; 1993; 20(3):111-5. PubMed ID: 8347757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interface pressure at different degrees of backrest elevation with various types of pressure-redistribution surfaces.
    Lippoldt J; Pernicka E; Staudinger T
    Am J Crit Care; 2014 Mar; 23(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 24585160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multi-stage versus single-stage inflation and deflation cycle for alternating low pressure air mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers in hospitalised patients: a randomised-controlled clinical trial.
    Demarré L; Beeckman D; Vanderwee K; Defloor T; Grypdonck M; Verhaeghe S
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2012 Apr; 49(4):416-26. PubMed ID: 22056165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An investigation of interface pressures in low air loss beds.
    Ryan DW; Allen V; Murray A
    Int J Clin Pract; 1997; 51(5):296-8. PubMed ID: 9489088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interface pressure characteristics of alternating air cell mattresses in persons with spinal cord injury.
    Goetz LL; Brown GS; Priebe MM
    J Spinal Cord Med; 2002; 25(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 12214903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microcirculatory responses of sacral tissue in healthy individuals and inpatients on different pressure-redistribution mattresses.
    Bergstrand S; Källman U; Ek AC; Engström M; Lindgren M
    J Wound Care; 2015 Aug; 24(8):346-58. PubMed ID: 26562377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Quantitative assessment of pressure relief at the sacral area in adults lying supine on the operating room table].
    Masatsugu M; Akata T; Itonaga Y; Nakao F; Kansha M; Sato M; Takamatsu J
    Masui; 2005 Mar; 54(3):313-9. PubMed ID: 15794114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transcutaneous oxygen tension measurement over the sacrum on various anti-decubitus mattresses.
    Jakobsen J; Christensen KS
    Dan Med Bull; 1987 Dec; 34(6):330-1. PubMed ID: 3436160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Laboratory performance of alternating pressure air mattresses component and sequelae.
    Bain D
    Br J Nurs; 2011 Nov 10-23; 20(20):S29-34. PubMed ID: 22067933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preventing pressure ulcers: an evaluation of four operating-table mattresses.
    Defloor T; De Schuijmer JD
    Appl Nurs Res; 2000 Aug; 13(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 10960997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of alternating air mattresses using a time-based interface pressure threshold technique.
    Rithalia SV; Gonsalkorale M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jun; 35(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 9651895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the effectiveness of two pressure-relieving surfaces: low-air-loss versus static fluid.
    Hardin JB; Cronin SN; Cahill K
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Sep; 46(9):50-6. PubMed ID: 11189541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supine interface pressure in children.
    Solis I; Krouskop T; Trainer N; Marburger R
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Jul; 69(7):524-6. PubMed ID: 3389994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development and evaluation of an air mattress structure and function for reducing discomfort when elevating the head-of-bed.
    Ogawa Y; Mori T; Noguchi H; Nakagami G; Sanada H
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 Jan; 10(1):81-8. PubMed ID: 24053189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and evaluation of a self-regulating alternating pressure air cushion.
    Nakagami G; Sanada H; Sugama J
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2015 Mar; 10(2):165-9. PubMed ID: 24320194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Principles of alternating pressure surfaces.
    McLeod AG
    Adv Wound Care; 1997; 10(7):30-6. PubMed ID: 9450404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.