These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

240 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22542804)

  • 1. Direct lexical control of eye movements in reading: evidence from a survival analysis of fixation durations.
    Reingold EM; Reichle ED; Glaholt MG; Sheridan H
    Cogn Psychol; 2012 Sep; 65(2):177-206. PubMed ID: 22542804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reversed preview benefit effects: Forced fixations emphasize the importance of parafoveal vision for efficient reading.
    Schotter ER; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Dec; 42(12):2039-2067. PubMed ID: 27732044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stable preview difficulty effects in reading with an improved variant of the boundary paradigm.
    Risse S; Seelig S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jul; 72(7):1632-1645. PubMed ID: 30501560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dissociating parafoveal preview benefit and parafovea-on-fovea effects during reading: A combined eye tracking and EEG study.
    Niefind F; Dimigen O
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Dec; 53(12):1784-1798. PubMed ID: 27680711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dissociating preview validity and preview difficulty in parafoveal processing of word n + 1 during reading.
    Risse S; Kliegl R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Apr; 40(2):653-68. PubMed ID: 24294870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of foveal lexical processing load on parafoveal preview and saccadic targeting during Chinese reading.
    Zhang M; Liversedge SP; Bai X; Yan G; Zang C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Jun; 45(6):812-825. PubMed ID: 31120302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of parafoveal word length and contextual constraint on fixation durations and word skipping in reading.
    White SJ; Rayner K; Liversedge SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Jun; 12(3):466-71. PubMed ID: 16235630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Parafoveal processing affects outgoing saccade length during the reading of Chinese.
    Liu Y; Reichle ED; Li X
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Jul; 41(4):1229-36. PubMed ID: 25181495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Parafoveal preview benefit in reading is not cumulative across multiple saccades.
    McDonald SA
    Vision Res; 2005 Jun; 45(14):1829-34. PubMed ID: 15797772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Parafoveal previews and lexical frequency in natural reading: Evidence from eye movements and fixation-related potentials.
    Degno F; Loberg O; Zang C; Zhang M; Donnelly N; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Mar; 148(3):453-474. PubMed ID: 30335444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of parafoveal word length and orthographic features on initial fixation landing positions in reading.
    Plummer P; Rayner K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):950-63. PubMed ID: 22391893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flexible parafoveal encoding of character order supports word predictability effects in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements.
    Chang M; Hao L; Zhao S; Li L; Paterson KB; Wang J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Aug; 82(6):2793-2801. PubMed ID: 32406003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The time course of word frequency and case alternation effects on fixation times in reading: evidence for lexical control of eye movements.
    Reingold EM; Yang J; Rayner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Dec; 36(6):1677-83. PubMed ID: 20731513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Why does removing inter-word spaces produce reading deficits? The role of parafoveal processing.
    Sheridan H; Reichle ED; Reingold EM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1543-1552. PubMed ID: 26801166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preview benefit during eye fixations in reading for older and younger readers.
    Rayner K; Castelhano MS; Yang J
    Psychol Aging; 2010 Sep; 25(3):714-8. PubMed ID: 20853974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Forced fixations, trans-saccadic integration, and word recognition: Evidence for a hybrid mechanism of saccade triggering in reading.
    Schotter ER; von der Malsburg T; Leinenger M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(4):677-688. PubMed ID: 29999398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Parafoveal processing of repeated words during reading.
    Drieghe D; Chan Seem R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1451-1460. PubMed ID: 35217984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preview frequency effects in reading: evidence from Chinese.
    Pan J; Yan M
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2256-2265. PubMed ID: 35083499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influences on and consequences of parafoveal preview in reading.
    Luke SG
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1675-1682. PubMed ID: 30088258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parafoveal preview effects in reading unspaced text.
    Drieghe D; Fitzsimmons G; Liversedge SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Oct; 43(10):1701-1716. PubMed ID: 28967779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.