These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22543721)
21. International assessment of the quality of clinical practice guidelines in oncology using the Appraisal of Guidelines and Research and Evaluation Instrument. Burgers JS; Fervers B; Haugh M; Brouwers M; Browman G; Philip T; Cluzeau FA J Clin Oncol; 2004 May; 22(10):2000-7. PubMed ID: 15143093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Critical appraisal of the Minimal Clinical Recommendations (MCR) of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO): challenges for a European framework for the development of clinical practice guidelines. Fervers B; Philip T; Browman GP Ann Oncol; 2002 Sep; 13(9):1507-9; author reply 1509. PubMed ID: 12196379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Quality of clinical practice guidelines in dermatological oncology. de Haas ER; de Vijlder HC; van Reesema WS; van Everdingen JJ; Neumann HA J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol; 2007 Oct; 21(9):1193-8. PubMed ID: 17894704 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. European cooperation for clinical practice guidelines in cancer. Philip T; Fervers B; Haugh M; Otter R; Browman G Br J Cancer; 2003 Aug; 89 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S1-3. PubMed ID: 12915895 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. ASO Author Reflections: Demonstrating the Benefits of Oncology Navigation. Enomoto LM; Shen P Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 26(Suppl 3):840-841. PubMed ID: 31659637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Systematic evidence-based clinical practice guidelines are ushering in a new stage of standardized management of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan. Song P; Tang W; Hasegawa K; Kokudo N Drug Discov Ther; 2014 Apr; 8(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 24815580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. NCCN: evolution in the early years. Young RC J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2015 Mar; 13(3):255-6. PubMed ID: 25736002 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The "value" of value in gynecologic oncology practice in the United States: Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidence-based review and recommendations. Cohn DE; Ko E; Meyer LA; Wright JD; Temkin SM; Foote J; Jones NL; Havrilesky LJ Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Apr; 145(1):185-191. PubMed ID: 28258763 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Simplifying the language of evidence to improve patient care: Strength of recommendation taxonomy (SORT): a patient-centered approach to grading evidence in medical literature. Ebell MH; Siwek J; Weiss BD; Woolf SH; Susman JL; Ewigman B; Bowman M J Fam Pract; 2004 Feb; 53(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 14764293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. European edition of the NCCN clinical practice guidelines: relevance of the translation and adaptation into Spanish. Guillem V; Camps C; Carrato A; Díaz-Rubio E; Gascón P Clin Transl Oncol; 2017 Mar; 19(3):288-290. PubMed ID: 27604422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. On the evidence. Gynaecological cancers. Melville A; Eastwood A Health Serv J; 1999 Jul; 109(5661):34-5. PubMed ID: 10538758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Guidelines and standards in surgical training. Pietroni M Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1993 Sep; 75(5):305-7. PubMed ID: 8215142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. UICC drops the ball in the 8th edition TNM staging of urological cancers. Delahunt B; Egevad L; Samaratunga H; Varma M; Verrill C; Cheville J; Kristiansen G; Corbishley C; Berney DM Histopathology; 2017 Jul; 71(1):5-11. PubMed ID: 28239904 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]