These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

79 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22543768)

  • 1. The ureter as a landmark for robotic sacrocolpopexy.
    McCullough M; Valceus J; Downes K; Hoyte L
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2012; 18(3):162-4. PubMed ID: 22543768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vascular and ureteral anatomy relative to the midsacral promontory.
    Good MM; Abele TA; Balgobin S; Montoya TI; McIntire D; Corton MM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jun; 208(6):486.e1-7. PubMed ID: 23454254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does Side Make a Difference? Anatomical Differences Between the Left and Right Ureter.
    Odegard SE; Abernethy MG; Mueller ER
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2015; 21(5):249-51. PubMed ID: 26313493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The anatomy of the sacral promontory: How to avoid complications of the sacrocolpopexy procedure.
    Giraudet G; Protat A; Cosson M
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):457.e1-457.e3. PubMed ID: 29305252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. First sacral nerve and anterior longitudinal ligament anatomy: clinical applications during sacrocolpopexy.
    Florian-Rodriguez ME; Hamner JJ; Corton MM
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Nov; 217(5):607.e1-607.e4. PubMed ID: 28709584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of the median sacral artery course at the sacral promontory using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
    Zilberlicht A; Molnar R; Pal-Ohana H; Haya N; Auslender R; Abramov Y
    Int Urogynecol J; 2017 Jan; 28(1):101-104. PubMed ID: 27372946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Exploration of the safe suture area of the presacral space in sacrocolpopexy by 3-dimensional (3D) models reconstructed from CT.
    Shen P; Peng C; Zhang W; Fu J; Chen C; Liu P
    Int Urogynecol J; 2021 Apr; 32(4):865-870. PubMed ID: 33471143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Critical Anatomy Relative to the Sacral Suture: A Postoperative Imaging Study After Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.
    Crisp CC; Herfel CV; Pauls RN; Westermann LB; Kleeman SD
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2016; 22(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 26680566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Optimal location and orientation of suture placement in abdominal sacrocolpopexy.
    White AB; Carrick KS; Corton MM; McIntire DD; Word RA; Rahn DD; Wai CY
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 May; 113(5):1098-1103. PubMed ID: 19384126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic sacrocolpopexy for the management of pelvic organ prolapse: a review of midterm surgical and quality of life outcomes.
    Barboglio PG; Toler AJ; Triaca V
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2014; 20(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 24368487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anatomic Relationship Between Ureter and Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Access: Analysis Based on Contrast-Enhanced Computed Tomographic Urography.
    Xiao L; Xu Z; Liu C; Zhao Q; Zhang Y; Xu H
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Mar; 123():e717-e722. PubMed ID: 30576813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Computed-tomography image segmentation and 3D-reconstruction of the female pelvis for the preoperative planning of sacrocolpopexy: preliminary data.
    Albanesi G; Giannini A; Carbone M; Russo E; Mannella P; Ferrari V; Simoncini T
    Int Urogynecol J; 2019 May; 30(5):725-731. PubMed ID: 29959466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robotic-assisted sacrocolpopexy/sacrocervicopexy repair of pelvic organ prolapse: initial experience.
    Göçmen A; Sanlıkan F; Uçar MG
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Mar; 285(3):683-8. PubMed ID: 21818575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse.
    Di Marco DS; Chow GK; Gettman MT; Elliott DS
    Urology; 2004 Feb; 63(2):373-6. PubMed ID: 14972496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Correlation of patient age with CT-measured aorta-sacral promontory distance.
    Agrawal A; Abayazeed A; Francis SL; Tolentino J; Ostergard DR; Seow A; Van Bogaert E; Rose T; Deveneau NE; Azadi A
    Int Urogynecol J; 2015 Jun; 26(6):887-91. PubMed ID: 25634664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Computed tomography pelvimetry as a predictor of technical difficulty in total mesorectal excision].
    Yan HH; Lou Z; Sheng J; Zhang W; Fu CG; Meng RG
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Nov; 14(11):846-50. PubMed ID: 22116717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Excretory phase CT urography for opacification of the urinary collecting system.
    McNicholas MM; Raptopoulos VD; Schwartz RK; Sheiman RG; Zormpala A; Prassopoulos PK; Ernst RD; Pearlman JD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 May; 170(5):1261-7. PubMed ID: 9574598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidetector row CT urography: does supine or prone positioning produce better pelvecalyceal and ureteral opacification?
    Wang ZJ; Coakley FV; Joe BN; Qayyum A; Meng MV; Yeh BM
    Clin Imaging; 2009; 33(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 19712817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A radiological study on the anatomical proximity of the ureters and the cervix.
    Gemer O; Simonovsky A; Huerta M; Kapustian V; Anteby E; Linov L
    Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct; 2007 Sep; 18(9):991-5. PubMed ID: 17221148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Effect of the anterior aspect of sacral nerve root tunnel on iliosacral screw placement on the standard lateral image of sacrum].
    Cai HM; Cheng CD; Wu XJ; Wang WC; Tang JC; Duan WF; Zhang C; Li HW; Li WY
    Zhongguo Gu Shang; 2014 Apr; 27(4):326-30. PubMed ID: 25029843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.