413 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22543970)
1. Magnetic resonance perfusion of the myocardium: semiquantitative and quantitative evaluation in comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Huber A; Sourbron S; Klauss V; Schaefer J; Bauner KU; Schweyer M; Reiser M; Rummeny E; Rieber J
Invest Radiol; 2012 Jun; 47(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 22543970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the functional assessment of coronary artery disease: a comparison with coronary angiography and fractional flow reserve.
Rieber J; Huber A; Erhard I; Mueller S; Schweyer M; Koenig A; Schiele TM; Theisen K; Siebert U; Schoenberg SO; Reiser M; Klauss V
Eur Heart J; 2006 Jun; 27(12):1465-71. PubMed ID: 16720685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Resting myocardial blood flow is impaired in hibernating myocardium: a magnetic resonance study of quantitative perfusion assessment.
Selvanayagam JB; Jerosch-Herold M; Porto I; Sheridan D; Cheng AS; Petersen SE; Searle N; Channon KM; Banning AP; Neubauer S
Circulation; 2005 Nov; 112(21):3289-96. PubMed ID: 16286587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Coronary artery disease: myocardial perfusion MR imaging with sensitivity encoding versus conventional angiography.
Plein S; Radjenovic A; Ridgway JP; Barmby D; Greenwood JP; Ball SG; Sivananthan MU
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):423-30. PubMed ID: 15858084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relative flow reserve derived from quantitative perfusion imaging may not outperform stress myocardial blood flow for identification of hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Stuijfzand WJ; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Danad I; Rijnierse MT; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Harms HJ; Heymans MW; Huisman MC; Marques KM; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; Sörensen J; van Royen N; Knuuti J; Knaapen P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Whole-heart dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve: determination of volumetric myocardial ischaemic burden and coronary lesion location.
Manka R; Paetsch I; Kozerke S; Moccetti M; Hoffmann R; Schroeder J; Reith S; Schnackenburg B; Gaemperli O; Wissmann L; Wyss CA; Kaufmann PA; Corti R; Boesiger P; Marx N; Lüscher TF; Jahnke C
Eur Heart J; 2012 Aug; 33(16):2016-24. PubMed ID: 22677136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Additive value of magnetic resonance coronary angiography in a comprehensive cardiac magnetic resonance stress-rest protocol for detection of functionally significant coronary artery disease: a pilot study.
Bettencourt N; Ferreira N; Chiribiri A; Schuster A; Sampaio F; Santos L; Melica B; Rodrigues A; Braga P; Teixeira M; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Portugal P; Gama V; Nagel E
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Sep; 6(5):730-8. PubMed ID: 23833284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Myocardial microcirculation in humans--new approaches using MRI].
Wacker CM; Bauer WR
Herz; 2003 Mar; 28(2):74-81. PubMed ID: 12669220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of myocardial perfusion: value of various semiquantitative perfusion parameters].
Huber A; Schweyer M; Bauner K; Theisen D; Rist C; Mühling O; Näbauer M; Schönberg S; Reiser M
Radiologe; 2007 Apr; 47(4):319-24. PubMed ID: 17318471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of quantitative coronary angiography and first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of an impaired coronary perfusion in nonsevere coronary stenosis.
Barmeyer AA; Stork A; Muellerleile K; Schofer AK; Tiburtius C; Koester R; Heitzer T; Adam G; Meinertz T; Lund GK
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 May; 27(5):1005-11. PubMed ID: 18425839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Quantitative assessment of myocardial perfusion in the detection of significant coronary artery disease: cutoff values and diagnostic accuracy of quantitative [(15)O]H2O PET imaging.
Danad I; Uusitalo V; Kero T; Saraste A; Raijmakers PG; Lammertsma AA; Heymans MW; Kajander SA; Pietilä M; James S; Sörensen J; Knaapen P; Knuuti J
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2014 Oct; 64(14):1464-75. PubMed ID: 25277618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between regional myocardial oxygenation and perfusion in patients with coronary artery disease: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography.
Karamitsos TD; Leccisotti L; Arnold JR; Recio-Mayoral A; Bhamra-Ariza P; Howells RK; Searle N; Robson MD; Rimoldi OE; Camici PG; Neubauer S; Selvanayagam JB
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2010 Jan; 3(1):32-40. PubMed ID: 19920032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Regional myocardial perfusion reserve determined using myocardial perfusion magnetic resonance imaging showed a direct correlation with coronary flow velocity reserve by Doppler flow wire.
Kurita T; Sakuma H; Onishi K; Ishida M; Kitagawa K; Yamanaka T; Tanigawa T; Kitamura T; Takeda K; Ito M
Eur Heart J; 2009 Feb; 30(4):444-52. PubMed ID: 19098020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. First-pass myocardial perfusion cardiovascular magnetic resonance at 3 Tesla.
Su MY; Yang KC; Wu CC; Wu YW; Yu HY; Tseng RY; Tseng WY
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(4):633-44. PubMed ID: 17578718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter evaluation of dynamic three-dimensional magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of coronary artery disease defined by fractional flow reserve.
Manka R; Wissmann L; Gebker R; Jogiya R; Motwani M; Frick M; Reinartz S; Schnackenburg B; Niemann M; Gotschy A; Kuhl C; Nagel E; Fleck E; Marx N; Luescher TF; Plein S; Kozerke S
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):. PubMed ID: 25901043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Myocardial perfusion reserve assessed by T2-prepared steady-state free precession blood oxygen level-dependent magnetic resonance imaging in comparison to fractional flow reserve.
Walcher T; Manzke R; Hombach V; Rottbauer W; Wöhrle J; Bernhardt P
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Sep; 5(5):580-6. PubMed ID: 22855554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging parameters to detect anatomically and hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease.
Futamatsu H; Wilke N; Klassen C; Shoemaker S; Angiolillo DJ; Siuciak A; Morikawa-Futamatsu K; Suzuki N; von Ziegler F; Bass TA; Costa MA
Am Heart J; 2007 Aug; 154(2):298-305. PubMed ID: 17643580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of myocardial ischemia by automated, motion-corrected, color-encoded perfusion maps compared with visual analysis of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging at 3 T: a pilot study.
Doesch C; Papavassiliu T; Michaely HJ; Attenberger UI; Glielmi C; Süselbeck T; Fink C; Borggrefe M; Schoenberg SO
Invest Radiol; 2013 Sep; 48(9):678-86. PubMed ID: 23563196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Absolute flow or myocardial flow reserve for the detection of significant coronary artery disease?
Joutsiniemi E; Saraste A; Pietilä M; Mäki M; Kajander S; Ukkonen H; Airaksinen J; Knuuti J
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jun; 15(6):659-65. PubMed ID: 24408930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Contrast-enhanced cardiac MR imaging in the detection of reduced coronary flow velocity reserve.
Barmeyer AA; Stork A; Muellerleile K; Tiburtius C; Schofer AK; Heitzer TA; Hofmann T; Adam G; Meinertz T; Lund GK
Radiology; 2007 May; 243(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 17456867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
