These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22544091)

  • 1. The influence of sociodemographic factors and hospital characteristics on the method of breast reconstruction, including microsurgery: a U.S. population-based study.
    Albornoz CR; Bach PB; Pusic AL; McCarthy CM; Mehrara BJ; Disa JJ; Cordeiro PG; Matros E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 May; 129(5):1071-1079. PubMed ID: 22544091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sociodemographics, referral patterns, and Internet use for decision-making in microsurgical breast reconstruction.
    Matros E; Yueh JH; Bar-Meir ED; Slavin SA; Tobias AM; Lee BT
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Apr; 125(4):1087-1094. PubMed ID: 20072087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of Physician Payments on Microvascular Breast Reconstruction: An All-Payer Claim Database Analysis.
    Panchal H; Shamsunder MG; Sheinin A; Sheckter CC; Berlin NL; Nelson JA; Allen R; Rubin D; Kozlow JH; Matros E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Feb; 145(2):333-339. PubMed ID: 31985616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The reconstructive journey: Description of the breast reconstruction pathway in a high-volume UK-based microsurgical centre.
    Moller L; Berner JE; Dheansa B
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2019 Dec; 72(12):1930-1935. PubMed ID: 31628083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Use of autologous and microsurgical breast reconstruction by U.S. plastic surgeons.
    Kulkarni AR; Sears ED; Atisha DM; Alderman AK
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Sep; 132(3):534-541. PubMed ID: 23985629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Economic implications of recent trends in U.S. immediate autologous breast reconstruction.
    Albornoz CR; Cordeiro PG; Mehrara BJ; Pusic AL; McCarthy CM; Disa JJ; Matros E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):463-470. PubMed ID: 24572839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Analyzing Regional Differences over a 15-Year Trend of One-Stage versus Two-Stage Breast Reconstruction in 941,191 Postmastectomy Patients.
    Kamali P; Koolen PGL; Ibrahim AMS; Paul MA; Dikmans RE; Schermerhorn ML; Lee BT; Lin SJ
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Jul; 138(1):1e-14e. PubMed ID: 26986990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of Regional Hospital Market Competition on Use Patterns of Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.
    Cerullo M; Lee C; Offodile AC
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Dec; 142(6):1438-1446. PubMed ID: 30489515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Determinants of patient satisfaction in postmastectomy breast reconstruction.
    Alderman AK; Wilkins EG; Lowery JC; Kim M; Davis JA
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(4):769-76. PubMed ID: 11007387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.
    Serletti JM; Moran SL
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Nov; 100(6):1418-24; discussion 1425-7. PubMed ID: 9385952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A nationwide analysis of the relationship between hospital volume and outcome for autologous breast reconstruction.
    Albornoz CR; Cordeiro PG; Hishon L; Mehrara BJ; Pusic AL; McCarthy CM; Disa JJ; Matros E
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Aug; 132(2):192e-200e. PubMed ID: 23897346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Patient-Reported Satisfaction and Quality of Life following Breast Reconstruction in Thin Patients: A Comparison between Microsurgical and Prosthetic Implant Recipients.
    Weichman KE; Broer PN; Thanik VD; Wilson SC; Tanna N; Levine JP; Choi M; Karp NS; Hazen A
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2015 Aug; 136(2):213-220. PubMed ID: 25909301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perioperative outcomes of autologous breast reconstruction surgery in teaching versus nonteaching hospitals.
    Masoomi H; Wirth GA; Paydar KZ; Richland BK; Evans GRD
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Oct; 134(4):514e-520e. PubMed ID: 25357045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A Nationwide Analysis of Cost Variation for Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.
    Billig JI; Lu Y; Momoh AO; Chung KC
    JAMA Surg; 2017 Nov; 152(11):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 28724133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unilateral failures in bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction.
    Rao SS; Parikh PM; Goldstein JA; Nahabedian MY
    Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Jul; 126(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20595829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of 2-Year Complication Rates Among Common Techniques for Postmastectomy Breast Reconstruction.
    Bennett KG; Qi J; Kim HM; Hamill JB; Pusic AL; Wilkins EG
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Oct; 153(10):901-908. PubMed ID: 29926077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
    Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
    Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. National Trends in Immediate Breast Reconstruction: An Analysis of Implant-Based Versus Autologous Reconstruction After Mastectomy.
    Mandelbaum AD; Thompson CK; Attai DJ; Baker JL; Slack G; DiNome ML; Benharash P; Lee MK
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2020 Nov; 27(12):4777-4785. PubMed ID: 32712889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Autologous options for postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of outcomes based on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    Gart MS; Smetona JT; Hanwright PJ; Fine NA; Bethke KP; Khan SA; Wang E; Kim JY
    J Am Coll Surg; 2013 Feb; 216(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 23211118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The role of autologous fat grafting in secondary microsurgical breast reconstruction.
    Weichman KE; Broer PN; Tanna N; Wilson SC; Allan A; Levine JP; Ahn C; Choi M; Karp NS; Allen R
    Ann Plast Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 23788122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.