These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22544808)

  • 41. A novel shape complementarity scoring function for protein-protein docking.
    Chen R; Weng Z
    Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):397-408. PubMed ID: 12696051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Molecular docking with ligand attached water molecules.
    Lie MA; Thomsen R; Pedersen CN; Schiøtt B; Christensen MH
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Apr; 51(4):909-17. PubMed ID: 21452852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. ID-Score: a new empirical scoring function based on a comprehensive set of descriptors related to protein-ligand interactions.
    Li GB; Yang LL; Wang WJ; Li LL; Yang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Mar; 53(3):592-600. PubMed ID: 23394072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. EADock: docking of small molecules into protein active sites with a multiobjective evolutionary optimization.
    Grosdidier A; Zoete V; Michielin O
    Proteins; 2007 Jun; 67(4):1010-25. PubMed ID: 17380512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biologically enhanced sampling geometric docking and backbone flexibility treatment with multiconformational superposition.
    Ma XH; Li CH; Shen LZ; Gong XQ; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):319-23. PubMed ID: 15981260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Towards an integrated description of hydrogen bonding and dehydration: decreasing false positives in virtual screening with the HYDE scoring function.
    Reulecke I; Lange G; Albrecht J; Klein R; Rarey M
    ChemMedChem; 2008 Jun; 3(6):885-97. PubMed ID: 18384086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.
    Moustakas DT; Lang PT; Pegg S; Pettersen E; Kuntz ID; Brooijmans N; Rizzo RC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006; 20(10-11):601-19. PubMed ID: 17149653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):526-34. PubMed ID: 17295466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Flexible docking allowing induced fit in proteins: insights from an open to closed conformational isomers.
    Sandak B; Wolfson HJ; Nussinov R
    Proteins; 1998 Aug; 32(2):159-74. PubMed ID: 9714156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Evaluation of docking performance: comparative data on docking algorithms.
    Kontoyianni M; McClellan LM; Sokol GS
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(3):558-65. PubMed ID: 14736237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult.
    Cole JC; Murray CW; Nissink JW; Taylor RD; Taylor R
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 15937897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Detailed comparison of the protein-ligand docking efficiencies of GOLD, a commercial package and ArgusLab, a licensable freeware.
    Joy S; Nair PS; Hariharan R; Pillai MR
    In Silico Biol; 2006; 6(6):601-5. PubMed ID: 17518767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. BALLDock/SLICK: a new method for protein-carbohydrate docking.
    Kerzmann A; Fuhrmann J; Kohlbacher O; Neumann D
    J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Aug; 48(8):1616-25. PubMed ID: 18646839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Structure-based prediction of transcription factor binding sites using a protein-DNA docking approach.
    Liu Z; Guo JT; Li T; Xu Y
    Proteins; 2008 Sep; 72(4):1114-24. PubMed ID: 18320590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Modeling side-chains using molecular dynamics improve recognition of binding region in CAPRI targets.
    Camacho CJ
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):245-51. PubMed ID: 15981253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions.
    Warren GL; Andrews CW; Capelli AM; Clarke B; LaLonde J; Lambert MH; Lindvall M; Nevins N; Semus SF; Senger S; Tedesco G; Wall ID; Woolven JM; Peishoff CE; Head MS
    J Med Chem; 2006 Oct; 49(20):5912-31. PubMed ID: 17004707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. PLHINT: A knowledge-driven computational approach based on the intermolecular H bond interactions at the protein-ligand interface from docking solutions.
    Kumar SP
    J Mol Graph Model; 2018 Jan; 79():194-212. PubMed ID: 29241118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Protein-ligand interfaces are polarized: discovery of a strong trend for intermolecular hydrogen bonds to favor donors on the protein side with implications for predicting and designing ligand complexes.
    Raschka S; Wolf AJ; Bemister-Buffington J; Kuhn LA
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Apr; 32(4):511-528. PubMed ID: 29435780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Van der Waals Potential in Protein Complexes.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; Veit-Acosta M; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():79-91. PubMed ID: 31452100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.