BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

777 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22545251)

  • 1. A randomized, prospective, open-ended clinical trial of zirconia fixed partial dentures on teeth and implants: interim results.
    Sagirkaya E; Arikan S; Sadik B; Kara C; Karasoy D; Cehreli M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(3):221-31. PubMed ID: 22545251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Five-year clinical results of zirconia frameworks for posterior fixed partial dentures.
    Sailer I; Fehér A; Filser F; Gauckler LJ; Lüthy H; Hämmerle CH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(4):383-8. PubMed ID: 17695869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical behavior of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures made of DC-Zirkon: 3-year results.
    Tinschert J; Schulze KA; Natt G; Latzke P; Heussen N; Spiekermann H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 18548959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. All-ceramic fixed partial dentures. Studies on aluminum oxide- and zirconium dioxide-based ceramic systems.
    Vult von Steyern P
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2005; (173):1-69. PubMed ID: 16001730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A prospective evaluation of zirconia posterior fixed dental prostheses: three-year clinical results.
    Peláez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Lozano JF; Suárez MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):373-9. PubMed ID: 22633593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-year clinical evaluation of In-Ceram Zirconia posterior FPDs.
    Suárez MJ; Lozano JF; Paz Salido M; Martínez F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 15008230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
    Larsson C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Zirconia posterior fixed partial dentures: a prospective clinical 3-year follow-up.
    Schmitt J; Holst S; Wichmann M; Reich S; Gollner M; Hamel J
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 19918596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Fracture force of tooth-tooth- and implant-tooth-supported all-ceramic fixed partial dentures using titanium vs. customised zirconia implant abutments.
    Kolbeck C; Behr M; Rosentritt M; Handel G
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1049-53. PubMed ID: 18707604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A four-year prospective clinical evaluation of zirconia and metal-ceramic posterior fixed dental prostheses.
    Pelaez J; Cogolludo PG; Serrano B; Serrano JF; Suarez MJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(5):451-8. PubMed ID: 22930766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival and complication rates of combined tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Nickenig HJ; Schäfer C; Spiekermann H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2006 Oct; 17(5):506-11. PubMed ID: 16958689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in the outcome of metal-ceramic tooth-supported single crowns and FDPs following the introduction of osseointegrated implant dentistry into a prosthodontic practice.
    Walton TR
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(3):260-7. PubMed ID: 19548408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Clinical risk factors related to failures with zirconia-based restorations: an up to 9-year retrospective study.
    Koenig V; Vanheusden AJ; Le Goff SO; Mainjot AK
    J Dent; 2013 Dec; 41(12):1164-74. PubMed ID: 24135294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Survival rates of a lithium disilicate-based core ceramic for three-unit esthetic fixed partial dentures: a 10-year prospective study.
    Solá-Ruiz MF; Lagos-Flores E; Román-Rodriguez JL; Highsmith Jdel R; Fons-Font A; Granell-Ruiz M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(2):175-80. PubMed ID: 23476914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prospective observation of a new bioactive luting cement: 2-year follow-up.
    Jefferies SR; Pameijer CH; Appleby DC; Boston D; Galbraith C; Lööf J; Glantz PO
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jan; 21(1):33-41. PubMed ID: 22040467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experimental zirconia abutments for implant-supported single-tooth restorations in esthetically demanding regions: 4-year results of a prospective clinical study.
    Glauser R; Sailer I; Wohlwend A; Studer S; Schibli M; Schärer P
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):285-90. PubMed ID: 15237873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of 209 all-ceramic single crowns cemented on natural and implant-supported abutments with different luting agents: a 6-year retrospective study.
    Sorrentino R; Galasso L; Tetè S; De Simone G; Zarone F
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):184-97. PubMed ID: 20030675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study.
    Tinschert J; Natt G; Mautsch W; Augthun M; Spiekermann H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2001; 14(3):231-8. PubMed ID: 11484570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Two-year prospective follow-up of implant/tooth-supported versus freestanding implant-supported fixed partial dentures.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Dec; 28(6):593-9. PubMed ID: 19146055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical outcome study of customized zirconia abutments for single-implant restorations.
    Canullo L
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 17944337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 39.