136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2254546)
1. Ventricular stroke work loss: validation of a method of quantifying the severity of aortic stenosis and derivation of an orifice formula.
Sprigings DC; Chambers JB; Cochrane T; Allen J; Jackson G
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Dec; 16(7):1608-14. PubMed ID: 2254546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of valvular resistance, stroke work loss, and Gorlin valve area for quantification of aortic stenosis. An in vitro study in a pulsatile aortic flow model.
Voelker W; Reul H; Nienhaus G; Stelzer T; Schmitz B; Steegers A; Karsch KR
Circulation; 1995 Feb; 91(4):1196-204. PubMed ID: 7850959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluating severity of aortic stenosis: new validation of an old method.
Dunn M; Hostetler M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1990 Dec; 16(7):1615-6. PubMed ID: 2254547
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous determination of aortic valve area by the Gorlin formula and by transesophageal echocardiography under different transvalvular flow conditions. Evidence that anatomic aortic valve area does not change with variations in flow in aortic stenosis.
Tardif JC; Rodrigues AG; Hardy JF; Leclerc Y; Petitclerc R; Mongrain R; Mercier LA
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1997 May; 29(6):1296-302. PubMed ID: 9137227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Valve orifice area alone is an insufficient index of aortic stenosis severity: effects of the proximal and distal geometry on transaortic energy loss.
Heinrich RS; Marcus RH; Ensley AE; Gibson DE; Yoganathan AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Sep; 8(5):509-15. PubMed ID: 10517392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Continuity equation and Gorlin formula compared with directly observed orifice area in native and prosthetic aortic valves.
Chambers JB; Sprigings DC; Cochrane T; Allen J; Morris R; Black MM; Jackson G
Br Heart J; 1992 Feb; 67(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 1540443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Flow dependence of measures of aortic stenosis severity during exercise.
Burwash IG; Pearlman AS; Kraft CD; Miyake-Hull C; Healy NL; Otto CM
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1994 Nov; 24(5):1342-50. PubMed ID: 7930259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of valve resistance, the continuity equation, and the Gorlin formula against directly observed orifice area in bioprosthetic valves in the mitral position: an in vitro study.
Chambers JB; Wang Z; Cooke RA; Black MM
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Mar; 5(2):136-43. PubMed ID: 8665004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic valve replacement reduces valvuloarterial impedance but does not affect systemic arterial compliance in elderly men with degenerative calcific trileaflet aortic valve stenosis.
Pagel PS; Schroeder AR; De Vry DJ; Hudetz JA
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2014 Dec; 28(6):1540-4. PubMed ID: 25267695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Functional Assessment of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valves by CMR.
Maragiannis D; Jackson MS; Flores-Arredondo JH; Autry K; Schutt RC; Alvarez PA; Zoghbi WA; Shah DJ; Little SH
JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 9(7):785-793. PubMed ID: 27184505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence.
Blais C; Pibarot P; Dumesnil JG; Garcia D; Chen D; Durand LG
Am J Cardiol; 2001 Jul; 88(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 11423057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
Wagner IM; Eichinger WB; Bleiziffer S; Botzenhardt F; Gebauer I; Guenzinger R; Bauernschmitt R; Lange R
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Physiological basis of flow dependence of Gorlin formula valve area in aortic stenosis: analysis using an hydraulic model of pulsatile flow.
Rifkin RD
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Nov; 9(6):740-51. PubMed ID: 11128779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experimental analysis of fluid mechanical energy losses in aortic valve stenosis: importance of pressure recovery.
Heinrich RS; Fontaine AA; Grimes RY; Sidhaye A; Yang S; Moore KE; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
Ann Biomed Eng; 1996; 24(6):685-94. PubMed ID: 8923988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. In vitro measurement of stenotic human aortic valve orifice area in a pulsatile flow model. Validation of the continuity equation.
Perakis AC; Montarello JK; Rosenthal E; Boyd EG; Yates AK; Deverall PB; Curry PV; Sowton E
Eur Heart J; 1990 Jun; 11(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 2351158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ejection fraction-velocity ratio for the assessment of aortic bioprosthetic valves in patients with systolic dysfunction.
Cattaneo P; Marchetti P; Baravelli M; Rossi A; Mariscalco G; Ghiringhelli S; Anzà C
Can J Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 25(3):e78-81. PubMed ID: 19279991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantification of aortic valve area and left ventricular muscle mass in healthy subjects and patients with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis by MRI.
Haimerl J; Freitag-Krikovic A; Rauch A; Sauer E
Z Kardiol; 2005 Mar; 94(3):173-81. PubMed ID: 15747039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressure recovery in aortic stenosis: an in vitro study in a pulsatile flow model.
Voelker W; Reul H; Stelzer T; Schmidt A; Karsch KR
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Dec; 20(7):1585-93. PubMed ID: 1452933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What do you mean by aortic valve area: geometric orifice area, effective orifice area, or gorlin area?
Garcia D; Kadem L
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Sep; 15(5):601-8. PubMed ID: 17044363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid Deployment Aortic Valves Deliver Superior Hemodynamic Performance In Vitro.
Ai L; Chen H; Lin V; Bapat VN
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(5):338-345. PubMed ID: 29023351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
