These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22545583)

  • 1. Innumeracy and unpacking: bridging the nomothetic/idiographic divide in violence risk assessment.
    Scurich N; Monahan J; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Dec; 36(6):548-54. PubMed ID: 22545583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of framing actuarial risk probabilities on involuntary civil commitment decisions.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Apr; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 20145984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of a model of violence risk assessment among forensic psychiatric patients.
    Douglas KS; Ogloff JR; Hart SD
    Psychiatr Serv; 2003 Oct; 54(10):1372-9. PubMed ID: 14557523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The dynamic appraisal of situational aggression: an instrument to assess risk for imminent aggression in psychiatric inpatients.
    Ogloff JR; Daffern M
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(6):799-813. PubMed ID: 17171770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Prospective actuarial risk assessment: a comparison of five risk assessment instruments in different sexual offender subtypes.
    Rettenberger M; Matthes A; Boer DP; Eher R
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2010 Apr; 54(2):169-86. PubMed ID: 19168639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Routine violence risk assessment in community forensic mental healthcare.
    van den Brink RH; Hooijschuur A; van Os TW; Savenije W; Wiersma D
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):396-410. PubMed ID: 19908211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. From group data to useful probabilities: the relevance of actuarial risk assessment in individual instances.
    Mossman D
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):93-102. PubMed ID: 25770285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Violence from young women involuntarily admitted for severe drug abuse.
    Palmstierna T; Olsson D
    Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2007 Jan; 115(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 17201868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gender differences in attitudes toward psychopathic sexual offenders.
    Guy LS; Edens JF
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(1):65-85. PubMed ID: 16491475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: evaluating the 'margins of error' of group v. individual predictions of violence.
    Hart SD; Michie C; Cooke DJ
    Br J Psychiatry Suppl; 2007 May; 49():s60-5. PubMed ID: 17470944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Personality disorder and violence: understand violence risk: an introduction to the special section personality disorder and violence.
    Cooke DJ
    J Pers Disord; 2010 Oct; 24(5):539-50. PubMed ID: 20958168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Bayesian approach to the group versus individual prediction controversy in actuarial risk assessment.
    Scurich N; John RS
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):237-46. PubMed ID: 22667813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A brief actuarial assessment for the prediction of wife assault recidivism: the Ontario domestic assault risk assessment.
    Hilton NZ; Harris GT; Rice ME; Lang C; Cormier CA; Lines KJ
    Psychol Assess; 2004 Sep; 16(3):267-75. PubMed ID: 15456382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relevance of interrater agreement to violence risk assessment.
    McNiel DE; Lam JN; Binder RL
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 2000 Dec; 68(6):1111-5. PubMed ID: 11142546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The classification of violence risk.
    Monahan J; Steadman HJ; Appelbaum PS; Grisso T; Mulvey EP; Roth LH; Robbins PC; Banks S; Silver E
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(6):721-30. PubMed ID: 17171769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The short- to medium-term predictive accuracy of static and dynamic risk assessment measures in a secure forensic hospital.
    Chu CM; Thomas SD; Ogloff JR; Daffern M
    Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):230-41. PubMed ID: 21856718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluating the validity of anger regulation problems, interpersonal style, and disturbed mental state for predicting inpatient violence.
    Doyle M; Dolan M
    Behav Sci Law; 2006; 24(6):783-98. PubMed ID: 17171766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. ["Serious crimes during treatment in legal psychiatric commitment (section 63 StGB)."Comment on the contribution by R. Freese et a].
    Leygraf N
    Nervenarzt; 1997 May; 68(5):434-7. PubMed ID: 9280856
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Another look at the (im-)precision of individual risk estimates made using actuarial risk assessment instruments.
    Hart SD; Cooke DJ
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(1):81-102. PubMed ID: 23322617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predicting recidivism with the Personality Assessment Inventory in a sample of sex offenders screened for civil commitment as sexually violent predators.
    Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Hawes SW; Simpler A; Johnson J
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):142-8. PubMed ID: 20230160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.