These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22545594)

  • 1. Modeling multiple response processes in judgment and choice.
    Böckenholt U
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Dec; 17(4):665-78. PubMed ID: 22545594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Integrating cognitive process and descriptive models of attitudes and preferences.
    Hawkins GE; Marley AA; Heathcote A; Flynn TN; Louviere JJ; Brown SD
    Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(4):701-35. PubMed ID: 24124986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The self-consistency model of subjective confidence.
    Koriat A
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Jan; 119(1):80-113. PubMed ID: 22022833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Robust decision making in a nonlinear world.
    Dougherty MR; Thomas RP
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):321-44. PubMed ID: 22329684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Permutation analysis of data with multiple binary category choices.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Feb; 92(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 12674264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Longitudinal analysis of data with multiple binary category choices.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2003 Aug; 93(1):127-31. PubMed ID: 14563038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Monte Carlo study of the impact of missing data and differential item functioning on theta estimates from two polytomous Rasch family models.
    Furlow CF; Fouladi RT; Gagne P; Whittaker TA
    J Appl Meas; 2007; 8(4):388-403. PubMed ID: 18250525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The description-experience gap in risky choice.
    Hertwig R; Erev I
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2009 Dec; 13(12):517-23. PubMed ID: 19836292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision makers conceive of their choices as interventions.
    Hagmayer Y; Sloman SA
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Feb; 138(1):22-38. PubMed ID: 19203168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modeling behavior in a clinically diagnostic sequential risk-taking task.
    Wallsten TS; Pleskac TJ; Lejuez CW
    Psychol Rev; 2005 Oct; 112(4):862-80. PubMed ID: 16262471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Subjective confidence in perceptual judgments: a test of the self-consistency model.
    Koriat A
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2011 Feb; 140(1):117-39. PubMed ID: 21299320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social functionalist frameworks for judgment and choice: intuitive politicians, theologians, and prosecutors.
    Tetlock PE
    Psychol Rev; 2002 Jul; 109(3):451-71. PubMed ID: 12088240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree.
    Kahneman D; Klein G
    Am Psychol; 2009 Sep; 64(6):515-26. PubMed ID: 19739881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response reversals in recognition memory.
    Van Zandt T; Maldonado-Molina MM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2004 Nov; 30(6):1147-66. PubMed ID: 15521795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Decision-tree models of categorization response times, choice proportions, and typicality judgments.
    Lafond D; Lacouture Y; Cohen AL
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):833-55. PubMed ID: 19839685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A generalized item response tree model for psychological assessments.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):1070-85. PubMed ID: 26208813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fitting a Thurstonian IRT model to forced-choice data using Mplus.
    Brown A; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Dec; 44(4):1135-47. PubMed ID: 22733226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. SEM of another flavour: two new applications of the supplemented EM algorithm.
    Cai L
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2008 Nov; 61(Pt 2):309-29. PubMed ID: 17971266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer modeling of clinical judgment.
    Kleinmuntz B; Elstein AS
    Crit Rev Med Inform; 1987; 1(3):209-28. PubMed ID: 3330690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An alternative perspective on von Winterfeldt et al.'s (1997) test of consequence monotonicity.
    Ho MH; Regenwetter M; Niederée R; Heyer D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Mar; 31(2):365-73. PubMed ID: 15755253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.