These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22545598)

  • 21. Prosodic structure shapes the temporal realization of intonation and manual gesture movements.
    Esteve-Gibert N; Prieto P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2013 Jun; 56(3):850-64. PubMed ID: 23275426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Prosodic predictors of upcoming positive or negative content in spoken messages.
    Swerts M; Hirschberg J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1337-45. PubMed ID: 20815468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Recognizing prosody across modalities, face areas and speakers: examining perceivers' sensitivity to variable realizations of visual prosody.
    Cvejic E; Kim J; Davis C
    Cognition; 2012 Mar; 122(3):442-53. PubMed ID: 22196745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Integrating constraints for learning word-referent mappings.
    Monaghan P; Mattock K
    Cognition; 2012 Apr; 123(1):133-43. PubMed ID: 22245031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In Search of Salience: Focus Detection in the Speech of Different Talkers.
    Ip MHK; Cutler A
    Lang Speech; 2022 Sep; 65(3):650-680. PubMed ID: 34841933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Neural correlates of the processing of co-speech gestures.
    Holle H; Gunter TC; Rüschemeyer SA; Hennenlotter A; Iacoboni M
    Neuroimage; 2008 Feb; 39(4):2010-24. PubMed ID: 18093845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Immediate integration of prosodic information from speech and visual information from pictures in the absence of focused attention: a mismatch negativity study.
    Li X; Yang Y; Ren G
    Neuroscience; 2009 Jun; 161(1):59-66. PubMed ID: 19409214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Bridging gaps in common ground: Speakers design their gestures for their listeners.
    Hilliard C; Cook SW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):91-103. PubMed ID: 26120773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3373-86. PubMed ID: 19425677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Toddlers use speech disfluencies to predict speakers' referential intentions.
    Kidd C; White KS; Aslin RN
    Dev Sci; 2011 Jul; 14(4):925-34. PubMed ID: 21676111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Infants detect cross-modal cues to identity in speech and singing.
    Trehub SE; Plantinga J; Brcic J
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2009 Jul; 1169():508-11. PubMed ID: 19673832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Utilization of visual information and listener strategies in intelligibility impairment related to bilateral facial paresis.
    Keintz C
    Int J Speech Lang Pathol; 2011 Dec; 13(6):510-7. PubMed ID: 21682545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Looking in the wrong direction correlates with more accurate word learning.
    Fitneva SA; Christiansen MH
    Cogn Sci; 2011 Mar; 35(2):367-80. PubMed ID: 21429004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Development of cross-linguistic variation in speech and gesture: motion events in English and Turkish.
    Ozyürek A; Kita S; Allen S; Brown A; Furman R; Ishizuka T
    Dev Psychol; 2008 Jul; 44(4):1040-54. PubMed ID: 18605833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Neural correlates of bimodal speech and gesture comprehension.
    Kelly SD; Kravitz C; Hopkins M
    Brain Lang; 2004 Apr; 89(1):253-60. PubMed ID: 15010257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of seeing the interlocutor on the production of prosodic contrasts (L).
    Cvejic E; Kim J; Davis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1011-4. PubMed ID: 22352476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Untrained speakers' use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation and listeners' interpretations.
    Tree JE; Meijer PJ
    Psychol Res; 2000; 63(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 10743382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech.
    Shukla M; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 16782083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.