These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22545614)

  • 1. Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects.
    Liefooghe B; Wenke D; De Houwer J
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Sep; 38(5):1325-35. PubMed ID: 22545614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resolving task rule incongruence during task switching by competitor rule suppression.
    Meiran N; Hsieh S; Dimov E
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):992-1002. PubMed ID: 20565214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus-based priming of task choice during voluntary task switching.
    Arrington CM; Weaver SM; Pauker RL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Jul; 36(4):1060-7. PubMed ID: 20565222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task-relevance modulates the effects of peripheral distractors.
    Lichtenstein-Vidne L; Henik A; Safadi Z
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Sep; 60(9):1216-26. PubMed ID: 17676554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preparing or executing the wrong task: the influence on switch effects.
    Desmet C; Fias W; Brass M
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1172-84. PubMed ID: 22375558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Task rule-congruency and Simon-like effects in switching between spatial tasks.
    Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1023-41. PubMed ID: 16194946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interactive effects of listwide control, item-based control, and working memory capacity on Stroop performance.
    Hutchison KA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):851-60. PubMed ID: 21517220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Maintaining information in visual working memory: Memory for bindings and memory for features are equally disrupted by increased attentional demands.
    Vergauwe E; Langerock N; Barrouillet P
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Sep; 68(3):158-62. PubMed ID: 25383473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The bilateral field advantage in a sequential face-name matching task with famous and nonfamous faces.
    Collin CA; Byrne S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 20384415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Conflict adaptation depends on task structure.
    Akçay C; Hazeltine E
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):958-73. PubMed ID: 18665738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Remember-Know and source memory instructions can qualitatively change old-new recognition accuracy: the modality-match effect in recognition memory.
    Mulligan NW; Besken M; Peterson D
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):558-66. PubMed ID: 20192551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interfering with remembering and knowing: effects of divided attention at retrieval.
    Skinner EI; Fernandes MA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):211-21. PubMed ID: 17599796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigating the role of response in spatial context learning.
    Makovski T; Jiang YV
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Aug; 64(8):1563-79. PubMed ID: 21480078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Visual similarity at encoding and retrieval in an item recognition task.
    Mate J; Baqués J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jul; 62(7):1277-84. PubMed ID: 19235099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. What matters in implicit task sequence learning: perceptual stimulus features, task sets, or correlated streams of information?
    Weiermann B; Cock J; Meier B
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1492-509. PubMed ID: 21038998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Automaticity of basic-level categorization accounts for labeling effects in visual recognition memory.
    Richler JJ; Gauthier I; Palmeri TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1579-87. PubMed ID: 21767063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cognitive control: dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences.
    Fernandez-Duque D; Knight M
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Apr; 34(2):340-55. PubMed ID: 18377175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lingering effects of inattention on the recognition of novel forms.
    Becker DV
    Memory; 2009 Aug; 17(6):687-94. PubMed ID: 19585347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of age on rule-based category learning.
    Racine CA; Barch DM; Braver TS; Noelle DC
    Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn; 2006; 13(3-4):411-34. PubMed ID: 16887781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.