230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22545650)
1. Prospects of implant with locking plate in fixation of subtrochanteric fracture: experimental demonstration of its potential benefits on synthetic femur model with supportive hierarchical nonlinear hyperelastic finite element analysis.
Latifi MH; Ganthel K; Rukmanikanthan S; Mansor A; Kamarul T; Bilgen M
Biomed Eng Online; 2012 Apr; 11():23. PubMed ID: 22545650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative finite element analysis of three implants fixing stable and unstable subtrochanteric femoral fractures: Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (PFNA), Proximal Femoral Locking Plate (PFLP), and Reverse Less Invasive Stabilization System (LISS).
Wang J; Ma JX; Lu B; Bai HH; Wang Y; Ma XL
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Feb; 106(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 31345739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Biomechanical effects of three internal fixation modes on femoral subtrochanteric spiral fractures in osteoporotic patients by finite element analysis].
An Y; Jiang D
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jun; 37(6):688-693. PubMed ID: 37331944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Finite element comparison of retrograde intramedullary nailing and locking plate fixation with/without an intramedullary allograft for distal femur fracture following total knee arthroplasty.
Chen SH; Chiang MC; Hung CH; Lin SC; Chang HW
Knee; 2014 Jan; 21(1):224-31. PubMed ID: 23582376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of proximal locking plates and blade plates for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femoral fractures.
Floyd JC; O'Toole RV; Stall A; Forward DP; Nabili M; Shillingburg D; Hsieh A; Nascone JW
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):628-33. PubMed ID: 19897983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Additional fixation of medial plate over the unstable lateral locked plating of distal femur fractures: A biomechanical study.
Park KH; Oh CW; Park IH; Kim JW; Lee JH; Kim HJ
Injury; 2019 Oct; 50(10):1593-1598. PubMed ID: 31288939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical evaluation of internal fixation for the treatment of comminuted subtrochanteric femur fractures.
Tazawa R; Minehara H; Matsuura T; Kawamura T; Sakai R; Yoshida K; Inoue G; Takaso M
J Orthop Sci; 2021 Mar; 26(2):261-265. PubMed ID: 32245694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Biomechanical research of less invasive stabilization system and dynamic condylar screw in fixing subtrochanteric fractures of femur].
Yang Y; Ma X; Ma J; Zhu S; Ma B; Ji S; Ma T; Chen Y
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Oct; 26(10):1213-7. PubMed ID: 23167106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A biomechanical comparison of the two- and four-hole side-plate dynamic hip screw in an osteoporotic composite femur model.
Rog D; Grigsby P; Hill Z; Pinette W; Inceoglu S; Zuckerman L
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2017; 25(2):2309499017717199. PubMed ID: 28664768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical effect of the configuration of screw hole style on locking plate fixation in proximal humerus fracture with a simulated gap: A finite element analysis.
Zhang YK; Wei HW; Lin KP; Chen WC; Tsai CL; Lin KJ
Injury; 2016 Jun; 47(6):1191-5. PubMed ID: 26975793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?
Stoffel K; Dieter U; Stachowiak G; Gächter A; Kuster MS
Injury; 2003 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():B11-9. PubMed ID: 14580982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical design prognosis of two extramedullary fixation devices for subtrochanteric femur fracture: a finite element study.
Nag P; Chanda S
Med Biol Eng Comput; 2021 Feb; 59(2):271-285. PubMed ID: 33417126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biomechanical analysis of a new carbon fiber/flax/epoxy bone fracture plate shows less stress shielding compared to a standard clinical metal plate.
Bagheri ZS; Tavakkoli Avval P; Bougherara H; Aziz MS; Schemitsch EH; Zdero R
J Biomech Eng; 2014 Sep; 136(9):091002. PubMed ID: 24828985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
Wilkens KJ; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 18827592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical analysis of four types of internal fixation in subtrochanteric fracture models.
Wang J; Ma XL; Ma JX; Xing D; Yang Y; Zhu SW; Ma BY; Chen Y; Feng R; Jia HB; Yu JT
Orthop Surg; 2014 May; 6(2):128-36. PubMed ID: 24890295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calcar screw position in proximal humerus fracture fixation: Don't miss high!
Mehta S; Chin M; Sanville J; Namdari S; Hast MW
Injury; 2018 Mar; 49(3):624-629. PubMed ID: 29452734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Finite element analysis comparison between superior clavicle locking plate with and without screw holes above fracture zone in midshaft clavicular fracture.
Pengrung N; Lakdee N; Puncreobutr C; Lohwongwatana B; Sa-Ngasoongsong P
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Oct; 20(1):465. PubMed ID: 31640668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
