165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22545929)
1. Recovering faces from memory: the distracting influence of external facial features.
Frowd CD; Skelton F; Atherton C; Pitchford M; Hepton G; Holden L; McIntyre AH; Hancock PJ
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2012 Jun; 18(2):224-38. PubMed ID: 22545929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Familiarity effects in the construction of facial-composite images using modern software systems.
Frowd CD; Skelton FC; Butt N; Hassan A; Fields S; Hancock PJ
Ergonomics; 2011 Dec; 54(12):1147-58. PubMed ID: 22103723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Whole-face procedures for recovering facial images from memory.
Frowd CD; Skelton F; Hepton G; Holden L; Minahil S; Pitchford M; McIntyre A; Brown C; Hancock PJ
Sci Justice; 2013 Jun; 53(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 23601715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention to internal face features in unfamiliar face matching.
Fletcher KI; Butavicius MA; Lee MD
Br J Psychol; 2008 Aug; 99(Pt 3):379-94. PubMed ID: 17706001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Young children's difficulty in disregarding information from external features when matching unfamiliar faces.
Sugimura T
J Exp Child Psychol; 2013 Oct; 116(2):296-308. PubMed ID: 23896414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of external facial features on the construction of facial composites.
Brown C; Portch E; Skelton FC; Fodarella C; Kuivaniemi-Smith H; Herold K; Hancock PJB; Frowd CD
Ergonomics; 2019 Apr; 62(4):575-592. PubMed ID: 30523739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks.
Megreya AM; Bindemann M; Havard C
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2011 May; 137(1):83-9. PubMed ID: 21459354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 7-11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift.
Bonner L; Burton M
Q J Exp Psychol A; 2004 Aug; 57(6):1019-29. PubMed ID: 15370514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Improving the quality of facial composites using a holistic cognitive interview.
Frowd CD; Bruce V; Smith AJ; Hancock PJ
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Sep; 14(3):276-87. PubMed ID: 18808281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An adaptation study of internal and external features in facial representations.
Hills C; Romano K; Davies-Thompson J; Barton JJ
Vision Res; 2014 Jul; 100():18-28. PubMed ID: 24747020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relative importance of external and internal features of facial composites.
Frowd C; Bruce V; McIntyre A; Hancock P
Br J Psychol; 2007 Feb; 98(Pt 1):61-77. PubMed ID: 17319051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Does matching of internal and external facial features depend on orientation and viewpoint?
Meinhardt-Injac B; Meinhardt G; Schwaninger A
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Nov; 132(3):267-78. PubMed ID: 19712921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Brain potentials and integration of external and internal features into face representations.
Olivares EI; Iglesias J
Int J Psychophysiol; 2008 Apr; 68(1):59-69. PubMed ID: 18295921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evolving and combining facial composites: between-witness and within-witness morphs compared.
Valentine T; Davis JP; Thorner K; Solomon C; Gibson S
J Exp Psychol Appl; 2010 Mar; 16(1):72-86. PubMed ID: 20350045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The eyes or the mouth? Feature salience and unfamiliar face processing in Williams syndrome and autism.
Riby DM; Doherty-Sneddon G; Bruce V
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):189-203. PubMed ID: 18609381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why 8-year-olds cannot tell the difference between Steve Martin and Paul Newman: factors contributing to the slow development of sensitivity to the spacing of facial features.
Mondloch CJ; Dobson KS; Parsons J; Maurer D
J Exp Child Psychol; 2004 Oct; 89(2):159-81. PubMed ID: 15388304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The importance of internal facial features in learning new faces.
Longmore CA; Liu CH; Young AW
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(2):249-60. PubMed ID: 25203612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage.
Caldara R; Schyns P; Mayer E; Smith ML; Gosselin F; Rossion B
J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 17(10):1652-66. PubMed ID: 16269103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Internal versus external features in triggering the brain waveforms for conjunction and feature faces in recognition.
Nie A; Jiang J; Fu Q
Neuroreport; 2014 Aug; 25(12):965-71. PubMed ID: 25003951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. External facial features modify the representation of internal facial features in the fusiform face area.
Axelrod V; Yovel G
Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(2):720-5. PubMed ID: 20406694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
