These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22545929)

  • 21. Transfer between pose and expression training in face recognition.
    Chen W; Liu CH
    Vision Res; 2009 Feb; 49(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 19056417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Sensitivity to feature displacement in familiar and unfamiliar faces: beyond the internal/external feature distinction.
    Brooks KR; Kemp RI
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1646-59. PubMed ID: 18265845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The first 100 milliseconds of a face: on the microgenesis of early face processing.
    Carbon CC
    Percept Mot Skills; 2011 Dec; 113(3):859-74. PubMed ID: 22403930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Attention misplaced: the role of diagnostic features in the face-inversion effect.
    Hills PJ; Ross DA; Lewis MB
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Oct; 37(5):1396-406. PubMed ID: 21728458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimal faces for gender and expression: a new technique for measuring dynamic templates used in face perception.
    Poirier FJ; Faubert J
    J Vis; 2012 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 22728677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants.
    Duchaine B; Nakayama K
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(4):576-85. PubMed ID: 16169565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Revisiting the processing of internal and external features of unfamiliar faces: the headscarf effect.
    Megreya AM; Bindemann M
    Perception; 2009; 38(12):1831-48. PubMed ID: 20192132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Training of familiar face recognition and visual scan paths for faces in a child with congenital prosopagnosia.
    Schmalzl L; Palermo R; Green M; Brunsdon R; Coltheart M
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2008 Jul; 25(5):704-29. PubMed ID: 18720102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The recognition of emotional expression in prosopagnosia: decoding whole and part faces.
    Stephan BC; Breen N; Caine D
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Nov; 12(6):884-95. PubMed ID: 17064450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. What gives a face its gender?
    Brown E; Perrett DI
    Perception; 1993; 22(7):829-40. PubMed ID: 8115240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Matching familiar and unfamiliar faces on internal and external features.
    Young AW; Hay DC; McWeeny KH; Flude BM; Ellis AW
    Perception; 1985; 14(6):737-46. PubMed ID: 3837875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cattle discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar conspecifics by using only head visual cues.
    Coulon M; Baudoin C; Heyman Y; Deputte BL
    Anim Cogn; 2011 Mar; 14(2):279-90. PubMed ID: 21132446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Familiarity and Within-Person Facial Variability: The Importance of the Internal and External Features.
    Kramer RSS; Manesi Z; Towler A; Reynolds MG; Burton AM
    Perception; 2018 Jan; 47(1):3-15. PubMed ID: 28803526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Emotional information in body and background hampers recognition memory for faces.
    Van den Stock J; de Gelder B
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2012 Mar; 97(3):321-5. PubMed ID: 22406473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Inferring social attributes from different face regions: evidence for holistic processing.
    Santos IM; Young AW
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Apr; 64(4):751-66. PubMed ID: 21086218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. When face recognition fails.
    Patterson KE; Baddeley AD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Learn; 1977 Jul; 3(4):406-17. PubMed ID: 864389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features, and for fractured faces.
    Moscovitch M; Moscovitch DA
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2000 Feb; 17(1):201-19. PubMed ID: 20945180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Face processing and familiarity: evidence from eye-movement data.
    Stacey PC; Walker S; Underwood JD
    Br J Psychol; 2005 Nov; 96(Pt 4):407-22. PubMed ID: 16248933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Matching identities of familiar and unfamiliar faces caught on CCTV images.
    Bruce V; Henderson Z; Newman C; Burton AM
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2001 Sep; 7(3):207-18. PubMed ID: 11676099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.