200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22546728)
1. Cross-language identification of long-term average speech spectra in Korean and English: toward a better understanding of the quantitative difference between two languages.
Noh H; Lee DH
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):441-3. PubMed ID: 22546728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Audibility of American English vowels produced by English-, Chinese-, and Korean-native speakers in long-term speech-shaped noise.
Liu C; Jin SH
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):49-55. PubMed ID: 21920420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evidence for language transfer leading to a perceptual advantage for non-native listeners.
Chang CB; Mishler A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Oct; 132(4):2700-10. PubMed ID: 23039462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reference sound pressure level for Korean speech audiometry.
Han H; Lee J; Cho S; Kim J; Lee K; Choi WD
Int J Audiol; 2011 Jan; 50(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 21047297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-Term Average Speech Spectra and Dynamic Ranges of 17 Indian Languages.
Narne VK; Sreejith V S ; Tiwari N
Am J Audiol; 2021 Dec; 30(4):1096-1107. PubMed ID: 34752152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. How Does Speaking Clearly Influence Acoustic Measures? A Speech Clarity Study Using Long-term Average Speech Spectra in Korean Language.
Noh H; Lee DH
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 Jun; 5(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 22737286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Phonetic perceptual identification by native- and second-language speakers differentially activates brain regions involved with acoustic phonetic processing and those involved with articulatory-auditory/orosensory internal models.
Callan DE; Jones JA; Callan AM; Akahane-Yamada R
Neuroimage; 2004 Jul; 22(3):1182-94. PubMed ID: 15219590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pitch control in esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech of Cantonese.
Yan N; Lam PK; Ng ML
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2012; 64(5):241-7. PubMed ID: 23051971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Amplification rationale for hearing aids based on characteristics of the Japanese language.
Shiraishi K; Wada M; Christiansen TU; Behrens T
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2022 Feb; 49(1):58-66. PubMed ID: 34006406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cross-language differences in informational masking of speech by speech: English versus Mandarin Chinese.
Wu X; Yang Z; Huang Y; Chen J; Li L; Daneman M; Schneider BA
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1506-24. PubMed ID: 22180019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dynamic range for speech materials in korean, english, and mandarin: a cross-language comparison.
Jin IK; Kates JM; Arehart KH
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 57(5):2024-30. PubMed ID: 24826909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Long-term average spectra of adult Iranian speakers' voice.
Moradi N; Maroufi N; Bijankhan M; Nik TH; Salavati M; Jalayer T; Latifi SM; Soltani M
J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):305-10. PubMed ID: 24238703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-language differences in fundamental frequency range: a comparison of English and German.
Mennen I; Schaeffler F; Docherty G
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2249-60. PubMed ID: 22423720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Segmental distribution patterns of English infant- and adult-directed speech.
Lee SA; Davis BL
J Child Lang; 2010 Sep; 37(4):767-91. PubMed ID: 19570319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristics of Korean phonology: review, tutorial, and case studies of Korean children speaking English.
Ha S; Johnson CJ; Kuehn DP
J Commun Disord; 2009; 42(3):163-79. PubMed ID: 19203766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Training the brain to weight speech cues differently: a study of Finnish second-language users of English.
Ylinen S; Uther M; Latvala A; Vepsäläinen S; Iverson P; Akahane-Yamada R; Näätänen R
J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1319-32. PubMed ID: 19445609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Encoding of pitch in the human brainstem is sensitive to language experience.
Krishnan A; Xu Y; Gandour J; Cariani P
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):161-8. PubMed ID: 15935624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hyperarticulation of vowels enhances phonetic change responses in both native and non-native speakers of English: evidence from an auditory event-related potential study.
Uther M; Giannakopoulou A; Iverson P
Brain Res; 2012 Aug; 1470():52-8. PubMed ID: 22771705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cross-linguistic comparison of frequency-following responses to voice pitch in American and Chinese neonates and adults.
Jeng FC; Hu J; Dickman B; Montgomery-Reagan K; Tong M; Wu G; Lin CD
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(6):699-707. PubMed ID: 21543983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
