164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22547247)
1. Failure of tibial polyethylene insert locking mechanism in posterior stabilized arthroplasty.
Thienpont E
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2013 Dec; 21(12):2685-8. PubMed ID: 22547247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does increased topside conformity in modular total knee arthroplasty lead to increased backside wear?
Schwarzkopf R; Scott RD; Carlson EM; Currier JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Jan; 473(1):220-5. PubMed ID: 24777725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Polyethylene subluxation: a radiographic sign of locking mechanism failure after modular total knee arthroplasty.
Hepinstall MS; Rodriguez JA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jan; 26(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 20137887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo deterioration of tibial baseplate locking mechanisms in contemporary modular total knee components.
Engh GA; Lounici S; Rao AR; Collier MB
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2001 Nov; 83(11):1660-5. PubMed ID: 11701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tibial interface wear in retrieved total knee components and correlations with modular insert motion.
Rao AR; Engh GA; Collier MB; Lounici S
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2002 Oct; 84(10):1849-55. PubMed ID: 12377918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Five cases of failure of the tibial polyethylene insert locking mechanism in one design of constrained knee arthroplasty.
Rapuri VR; Clarke HD; Spangehl MJ; Beauchamp CP
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Sep; 26(6):976.e21-4. PubMed ID: 20801615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Current Total Knee Designs: Does Baseplate Roughness or Locking Mechanism Design Affect Polyethylene Backside Wear?
Sisko ZW; Teeter MG; Lanting BA; Howard JL; McCalden RW; Naudie DD; MacDonald SJ; Vasarhelyi EM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):2970-2980. PubMed ID: 28905208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dissociation of polyethylene insert from the tibial baseplate following revision total knee arthroplasty.
Chen CE; Juhn RJ; Ko JY
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Feb; 26(2):339.e11-3. PubMed ID: 20570104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peripheral snap-fit locking mechanisms and smooth surface finish of tibial trays reduce backside wear in fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty.
Łapaj Ł; Mróz A; Kokoszka P; Markuszewski J; Wendland J; Helak-Łapaj C; Kruczyński J
Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):62-69. PubMed ID: 27781667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessment of backside wear from the analysis of 55 retrieved tibial inserts.
Li S; Scuderi G; Furman BD; Bhattacharyya S; Schmieg JJ; Insall JN
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2002 Nov; (404):75-82. PubMed ID: 12439241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recurrent dissociation of the tibial insert after mini-subvastus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a case report.
In Y; Sur YJ; Won HY; Moon YS
Knee; 2011 Dec; 18(6):461-3. PubMed ID: 20833051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Backside wear of modular ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tibial inserts.
Conditt MA; Ismaily SK; Alexander JW; Noble PC
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 May; 86(5):1031-7. PubMed ID: 15118049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Aseptic loosening of the option stemmed tibial tray in the Zimmer NexGen LPS total knee arthroplasty system.
Bhalekar RM; Wells SR; Nargol ME; Shariatpanahi S; Nargol AVF; Waller S; Wildberg L; Tilley S; Langton DJ
Knee; 2024 Mar; 47():1-12. PubMed ID: 38171206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The incidence of revision of the metal component of total knee arthroplasties in different tibial-insert designs.
Huang CH; Liau JJ; Lung CY; Lan CT; Cheng CK
Knee; 2002 Dec; 9(4):331-4. PubMed ID: 12424043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Tibial insert undersurface as a contributing source of polyethylene wear debris.
Wasielewski RC; Parks N; Williams I; Surprenant H; Collier JP; Engh G
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1997 Dec; (345):53-9. PubMed ID: 9418621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monoblock versus modular polyethylene insert in uncemented total knee arthroplasty.
Andersen MR; Winther N; Lind T; SchrøDer H; Flivik G; Petersen MM
Acta Orthop; 2016 Dec; 87(6):607-614. PubMed ID: 27649258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Implant design influences tibial post wear damage in posterior-stabilized knees.
Dolan MM; Kelly NH; Nguyen JT; Wright TM; Haas SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jan; 469(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 20711697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative Survivorship of Different Tibial Designs in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.
Kremers HM; Sierra RJ; Schleck CD; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Jul; 96(14):e121. PubMed ID: 25031383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The rates of osteolysis and loosening associated with a modular posterior stabilized knee replacement. Results at five to fourteen years.
Lachiewicz PF; Soileau ES
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 Mar; 86(3):525-30. PubMed ID: 14996878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Highly Crosslinked-remelted versus Less-crosslinked Polyethylene in Posterior Cruciate-retaining TKAs in the Same Patients.
Kim YH; Park JW; Kim JS; Lee JH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3588-94. PubMed ID: 26115866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
