281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22547420)
1. Dose-finding clinical trial design for ordinal toxicity grades using the continuation ratio model: an extension of the continual reassessment method.
Van Meter EM; Garrett-Mayer E; Bandyopadhyay D
Clin Trials; 2012 Jun; 9(3):303-13. PubMed ID: 22547420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Proportional odds model for dose-finding clinical trial designs with ordinal toxicity grading.
Van Meter EM; Garrett-Mayer E; Bandyopadhyay D
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2070-80. PubMed ID: 21344472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of various continual reassessment method models for dose-escalation phase 1 oncology clinical trials: using real clinical data and simulation studies.
James GD; Symeonides S; Marshall J; Young J; Clack G
BMC Cancer; 2021 Jan; 21(1):7. PubMed ID: 33402104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Incorporating lower grade toxicity information into dose finding designs.
Iasonos A; Zohar S; O'Quigley J
Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):370-9. PubMed ID: 21835856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance of two-stage continual reassessment method relative to an optimal benchmark.
Wages NA; Conaway MR; O'Quigley J
Clin Trials; 2013; 10(6):862-75. PubMed ID: 24085776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A new pragmatic design for dose escalation in phase 1 clinical trials using an adaptive continual reassessment method.
North B; Kocher HM; Sasieni P
BMC Cancer; 2019 Jun; 19(1):632. PubMed ID: 31242873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to design a dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method.
Wheeler GM; Mander AP; Bedding A; Brock K; Cornelius V; Grieve AP; Jaki T; Love SB; Odondi L; Weir CJ; Yap C; Bond SJ
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):18. PubMed ID: 30658575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of phase I dose-finding designs in clinical trials with monotonicity assumption violation.
Abbas R; Rossoni C; Jaki T; Paoletti X; Mozgunov P
Clin Trials; 2020 Oct; 17(5):522-534. PubMed ID: 32631095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The 3 + 3 design in dose-finding studies with small sample sizes: Pitfalls and possible remedies.
Chiuzan C; Dehbi HM
Clin Trials; 2024 Jun; 21(3):350-357. PubMed ID: 38618916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Rolling continual reassessment method with overdose control: An efficient and safe dose escalation design.
Zhu J; Sabanés Bové D; Liao Z; Beyer U; Yung G; Sarkar S
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Aug; 107():106436. PubMed ID: 34000410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comprehensive comparison of the continual reassessment method to the standard 3 + 3 dose escalation scheme in Phase I dose-finding studies.
Iasonos A; Wilton AS; Riedel ER; Seshan VE; Spriggs DR
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):465-77. PubMed ID: 18827039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Bayesian interval-based oncology dose-finding design with repeated quasi-continuous toxicity model.
Zhao D; Zhu J; Wang L
Contemp Clin Trials; 2021 Mar; 102():106265. PubMed ID: 33418097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose-finding design for multi-drug combinations.
Wages NA; Conaway MR; O'Quigley J
Clin Trials; 2011 Aug; 8(4):380-9. PubMed ID: 21652689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Modeling adverse event counts in phase I clinical trials of a cytotoxic agent.
Muenz DG; Braun TM; Taylor JM
Clin Trials; 2018 Aug; 15(4):386-397. PubMed ID: 29779418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of toxicity probability interval based designs in contrast to the continual reassessment method.
Horton BJ; Wages NA; Conaway MR
Stat Med; 2017 Jan; 36(2):291-300. PubMed ID: 27435150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A novel toxicity scoring system treating toxicity response as a quasi-continuous variable in Phase I clinical trials.
Chen Z; Krailo MD; Azen SP; Tighiouart M
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Sep; 31(5):473-82. PubMed ID: 20609419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Practical modifications to the time-to-event continual reassessment method for phase I cancer trials with fast patient accrual and late-onset toxicities.
Polley MY
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(17):2130-43. PubMed ID: 21590790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The continual reassessment method for dose-finding studies: a tutorial.
Garrett-Mayer E
Clin Trials; 2006; 3(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 16539090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incorporating adverse event relatedness into dose-finding clinical trial designs.
Darssan D; Thompson MH; Pettitt AN
Stat Med; 2014 Mar; 33(7):1146-61. PubMed ID: 24122859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quasi-partial order continual reassessment method: Applying toxicity scores to cancer dose-finding drug combination trials.
O'Connell NS; Wages NA; Garrett-Mayer E
Contemp Clin Trials; 2023 Feb; 125():107050. PubMed ID: 36529437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
