397 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22547423)
41. Geometry of proximal femur in the prediction of hip fracture in osteoporotic women.
Gnudi S; Ripamonti C; Gualtieri G; Malavolta N
Br J Radiol; 1999 Aug; 72(860):729-33. PubMed ID: 10624337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Bisphosphonates Use and Risk of Subtrochanteric and Diaphyseal Femur Fractures in Korea: Results from the National Claim Registry.
Lee YK; Byun DW; Jung SM; Kwon HY; Kim HY; Kim SH; Kim TY; Jang S; Ha YC
Calcif Tissue Int; 2019 Mar; 104(3):313-319. PubMed ID: 30446771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Hip and Subtrochanteric or Femoral Shaft Fractures after Bisphosphonate Use in Korean Women, Using Korean National Sample Cohort.
Won SH; Ahn S; Ji E; Park JW; Kim JK; Lee YK
J Korean Med Sci; 2020 Jun; 35(25):e193. PubMed ID: 32597040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Evaluation of a simplified hip structure analysis method for the prediction of incident hip fracture events.
Khoo BC; Lewis JR; Brown K; Prince RL
Osteoporos Int; 2016 Jan; 27(1):241-8. PubMed ID: 26282230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Serum parathyroid hormone is associated with increased cortical porosity of the inner transitional zone at the proximal femur in postmenopausal women: the Tromsø Study.
Osima M; Borgen TT; Lukic M; Grimnes G; Joakimsen RM; Eriksen EF; Bjørnerem Å
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Feb; 29(2):421-431. PubMed ID: 29134242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Bisphosphonates and risk of subtrochanteric, femoral shaft, and atypical femur fracture: sensitivity and trim and fill studies.
Liu J; Zhang HX; Lu XX; Hu JJ; Deng LF
Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2014 Feb; 18(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 24205872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Audit of Atypical Femoral Fractures and a Description of Some of Their Features.
Lian K; Trollip J; Sandhu S; Moosavi M; Gill A; Kendler D; Dian L; Lentle B
Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Feb; 67(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 26800621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Assessment of the 10-year risk of fracture in Italian postmenopausal women using FRAX®: a north Italian multicenter study.
Pedrazzoni M; Girasole G; Giusti A; Barone A; Pioli G; Passeri G; Palummeri E; Bianchi G
J Endocrinol Invest; 2011 Dec; 34(11):e386-91. PubMed ID: 21750394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Real frequency of ordinary and atypical sub-trochanteric and diaphyseal fractures in France based on X-rays and medical file analysis.
Beaudouin-Bazire C; Dalmas N; Bourgeois J; Babinet A; Anract P; Chantelot C; Farizon F; Chopin F; Briot K; Roux C; Cortet B; Thomas T
Joint Bone Spine; 2013 Mar; 80(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 22999902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Subtrochanteric and diaphyseal femoral fractures in hypophosphatasia-not atypical at all.
Genest F; Seefried L
Osteoporos Int; 2018 Aug; 29(8):1815-1825. PubMed ID: 29774402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures.
Faulkner KG; Cummings SR; Black D; Palermo L; Glüer CC; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1993 Oct; 8(10):1211-7. PubMed ID: 8256658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. BMD T-score discriminates trochanteric fractures from unfractured controls, whereas geometry discriminates cervical fracture cases from unfractured controls of similar BMD.
Pulkkinen P; Partanen J; Jalovaara P; Jämsä T
Osteoporos Int; 2010 Jul; 21(7):1269-76. PubMed ID: 19784537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Proximal femur geometry: a major predictor of proximal femur fracture subtypes.
Senra AR; Carvalho DR; da Silva MR; Sousa AN; Torres J
Hip Int; 2023 Nov; 33(6):1100-1106. PubMed ID: 36253960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Correlation between distal radial cortical thickness and bone mineral density.
Webber T; Patel SP; Pensak M; Fajolu O; Rozental TD; Wolf JM
J Hand Surg Am; 2015 Mar; 40(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 25708436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Validation of diagnostic codes for subtrochanteric, diaphyseal, and atypical femoral fractures using administrative claims data.
Narongroeknawin P; Patkar NM; Shakoory B; Jain A; Curtis JR; Delzell E; Lander PH; Lopez-Ben RR; Pitt MJ; Safford MM; Volgas DA; Saag KG
J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 22071028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Atypical femoral fractures and bisphosphonate treatment: experience in two large United Kingdom teaching hospitals.
Thompson RN; Phillips JR; McCauley SH; Elliott JR; Moran CG
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Mar; 94(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 22371548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Femoral neck geometry and radiographic signs of osteoporosis as predictors of hip fracture.
Karlsson KM; Sernbo I; Obrant KJ; Redlund-Johnell I; Johnell O
Bone; 1996 Apr; 18(4):327-30. PubMed ID: 8726389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Fragility fractures of the hip and femur: incidence and patient characteristics.
Nieves JW; Bilezikian JP; Lane JM; Einhorn TA; Wang Y; Steinbuch M; Cosman F
Osteoporos Int; 2010 Mar; 21(3):399-408. PubMed ID: 19484169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Comparative high-resolution pQCT analysis of femoral neck indicates different bone mass distribution in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis.
Rubinacci A; Tresoldi D; Scalco E; Villa I; Adorni F; Moro GL; Fraschini GF; Rizzo G
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Jul; 23(7):1967-75. PubMed ID: 21947103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures.
Karjalainen JP; Riekkinen O; Töyräs J; Hakulinen M; Kröger H; Rikkonen T; Salovaara K; Jurvelin JS
Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1287-95. PubMed ID: 21656263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
