These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

285 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22547658)

  • 1. Personalized persuasion: tailoring persuasive appeals to recipients' personality traits.
    Hirsh JB; Kang SK; Bodenhausen GV
    Psychol Sci; 2012 Jun; 23(6):578-81. PubMed ID: 22547658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual differences in drivers' cognitive processing of road safety messages.
    Kaye SA; White MJ; Lewis IM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():272-81. PubMed ID: 22608267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing prosocial message effectiveness: effects of message quality, production quality, and persuasiveness.
    Austin EW; Pinkleton B; Fujioka Y
    J Health Commun; 1999; 4(3):195-210. PubMed ID: 10977288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion.
    Lee AY; Aaker JL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Feb; 86(2):205-18. PubMed ID: 14769079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Message sidedness in advertising: the moderating roles of need for cognition and time pressure in persuasion.
    Kao DT
    Scand J Psychol; 2011 Aug; 52(4):329-40. PubMed ID: 21752025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Marketing responsible drinking behavior: comparing the effectiveness of responsible drinking messages tailored to three possible "personality" conceptualizations.
    York VK; Brannon LA; Miller MM
    Health Mark Q; 2012; 29(1):49-65. PubMed ID: 22416925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The persuasive effects of framing messages on fruit and vegetable consumption according to regulatory focus theory.
    Dijkstra A; Rothman A; Pietersma S
    Psychol Health; 2011 Aug; 26(8):1036-48. PubMed ID: 21598188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Persuasive communication about AIDS prevention: need for cognition determines the impact of message format.
    Bakker AB
    AIDS Educ Prev; 1999 Apr; 11(2):150-62. PubMed ID: 10214498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Are anthropomorphic persuasive appeals effective? The role of the recipient's motivations.
    Tam KP
    Br J Soc Psychol; 2015 Mar; 54(1):187-200. PubMed ID: 24898876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hand hygiene posters: motivators or mixed messages?
    Jenner EA; Jones F; Fletcher BC; Miller L; Scott GM
    J Hosp Infect; 2005 Jul; 60(3):218-25. PubMed ID: 15949613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychological targeting as an effective approach to digital mass persuasion.
    Matz SC; Kosinski M; Nave G; Stillwell DJ
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2017 Nov; 114(48):12714-12719. PubMed ID: 29133409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of self-relevant perspective-taking on the impact of persuasive appeals.
    Hung IW; Wyer RS
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2014 Mar; 40(3):402-14. PubMed ID: 24311436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Should persuasion be affective or cognitive? The moderating effects of need for affect and need for cognition.
    Haddock G; Maio GR; Arnold K; Huskinson T
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):769-78. PubMed ID: 18344496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Self-guide framing and persuasion: responsibly increasing message processing to ideal levels.
    Evans LM; Petty RE
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2003 Mar; 29(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15273009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-efficacy moderates message-framing effects: The case of skin-cancer detection.
    van 't Riet J; Ruiter RA; Werrij MQ; De Vries H
    Psychol Health; 2010 Mar; 25(3):339-49. PubMed ID: 20204928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Increasing the effectiveness of messages promoting responsible undergraduate drinking: tailoring to personality and matching to context.
    York VK; Brannon LA; Miller MM
    Health Commun; 2012; 27(3):302-9. PubMed ID: 21951016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Schema-derived persuasion and perception of AIDS risk.
    Brannon LA; McCabe AE
    Health Mark Q; 2002; 20(2):31-48. PubMed ID: 14609019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessing college students' attitudes toward responsible drinking messages to identify promising binge drinking intervention strategies.
    Pilling VK; Brannon LA
    Health Commun; 2007; 22(3):265-76. PubMed ID: 17967148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. "Think" versus "feel" framing effects in persuasion.
    Mayer ND; Tormala ZL
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Apr; 36(4):443-54. PubMed ID: 20363901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Uncertainty orientation in the group context: categorization effects on persuasive message processing.
    Hodson G; Sorrentino RM
    J Soc Psychol; 2003 Jun; 143(3):291-312. PubMed ID: 12846514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.