These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22548326)

  • 21. Performance of using multiple stepwise algorithms for variable selection.
    Wiegand RE
    Stat Med; 2010 Jul; 29(15):1647-59. PubMed ID: 20552568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A method for ordinal outcomes: The ordered stereotype model.
    Fernandez D; Liu I; Costilla R
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2019 Dec; 28(4):e1801. PubMed ID: 31568635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Increased efficiency of analyses: cumulative logistic regression vs ordinary logistic regression.
    Taylor GW; Becker MP
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1998 Feb; 26(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 9511834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Robust decision making in a nonlinear world.
    Dougherty MR; Thomas RP
    Psychol Rev; 2012 Apr; 119(2):321-44. PubMed ID: 22329684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The performance of robust test statistics with categorical data.
    Savalei V; Rhemtulla M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2013 May; 66(2):201-23. PubMed ID: 22568535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysing multitrait-multimethod data with structural equation models for ordinal variables applying the WLSMV estimator: what sample size is needed for valid results?
    Nussbeck FW; Eid M; Lischetzke T
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2006 May; 59(Pt 1):195-213. PubMed ID: 16709286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. GEEORD: A SAS macro for analyzing ordinal response variables with repeated measures through proportional odds, partial proportional odds, or non-proportional odds models.
    Gao X; Schwartz TA; Preisser JS; Perin J
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 Oct; 150():23-30. PubMed ID: 28859827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Ridge structural equation modelling with correlation matrices for ordinal and continuous data.
    Yuan KH; Wu R; Bentler PM
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Feb; 64(Pt 1):107-33. PubMed ID: 21506947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Estimation of IRT graded response models: limited versus full information methods.
    Forero CG; Maydeu-Olivares A
    Psychol Methods; 2009 Sep; 14(3):275-99. PubMed ID: 19719362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A Comparison of Imputation Strategies for Ordinal Missing Data on Likert Scale Variables.
    Wu W; Jia F; Enders C
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(5):484-503. PubMed ID: 26610248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Goodness-of-fit tests for ordinal response regression models.
    Pulkstenis E; Robinson TJ
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):999-1014. PubMed ID: 15027085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Technical note: Analysis of ordinal outcomes from carcass data in beef cattle research.
    Osterstock JB; MacDonald JC; Boggess MM; Brown MS
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Oct; 88(10):3384-9. PubMed ID: 20525937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Modelling monotonic effects of ordinal predictors in Bayesian regression models.
    Bürkner PC; Charpentier E
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73(3):420-451. PubMed ID: 31943157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Sufficient Sample Size and Power in Multilevel Ordinal Logistic Regression Models.
    Ali S; Ali A; Khan SA; Hussain S
    Comput Math Methods Med; 2016; 2016():7329158. PubMed ID: 27746826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. On the meaning of formative measurement and how it differs from reflective measurement: comment on Howell, Breivik, and Wilcox (2007).
    Bagozzi RP
    Psychol Methods; 2007 Jun; 12(2):229-37; discussion 238-45. PubMed ID: 17563175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Tobit model for outcome variable is limited by censoring in nursing research.
    Lin KC; Cheng SF
    Nurs Res; 2011; 60(5):354-60. PubMed ID: 21873917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Coefficients of feasibility for ordinal response scales].
    Elosua Oliden P; Zumbo BD
    Psicothema; 2008 Nov; 20(4):896-901. PubMed ID: 18940100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Proportion of general factor variance in a hierarchical multiple-component measuring instrument: a note on a confidence interval estimation procedure.
    Raykov T; Zinbarg RE
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 May; 64(Pt 2):193-207. PubMed ID: 21492128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of bootstrap methods for analysing Health-Related Quality of Life outcomes (particularly the SF-36).
    Walters SJ; Campbell MJ
    Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2004 Dec; 2():70. PubMed ID: 15588308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of methods to handle skew distributed cost variables in the analysis of the resource consumption in schizophrenia treatment.
    Kilian R; Matschinger H; Löeffler W; Roick C; Angermeyer MC
    J Ment Health Policy Econ; 2002 Mar; 5(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 12529567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.