172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22549675)
1. Reproducibility of grading systems in oral epithelial dysplasia.
Manchanda A; Shetty DC
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal; 2012 Nov; 17(6):e935-42. PubMed ID: 22549675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: Points to ponder.
Geetha KM; Leeky M; Narayan TV; Sadhana S; Saleha J
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2015; 19(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 26604497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Why oral histopathology suffers inter-observer variability on grading oral epithelial dysplasia: an attempt to understand the sources of variation.
Kujan O; Khattab A; Oliver RJ; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2007 Mar; 43(3):224-31. PubMed ID: 16931119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of a new binary system of grading oral epithelial dysplasia for prediction of malignant transformation.
Kujan O; Oliver RJ; Khattab A; Roberts SA; Thakker N; Sloan P
Oral Oncol; 2006 Nov; 42(10):987-93. PubMed ID: 16731030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability in Diagnosis of Oral Dysplasia.
R SA; B N P; Hegde U; K U; G S; G K; Sil S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2017 Dec; 18(12):3251-3254. PubMed ID: 29286215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calibration improves the agreement in grading oral epithelial dysplasia-Findings from a National Workshop in Malaysia.
Kallarakkal TG; Zaini ZM; Ghani WMN; Karen-Ng LP; Siriwardena BSMS; Cheong SC; Tilakaratne WM
J Oral Pathol Med; 2024 Jan; 53(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 38081145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observer agreement in the grading of oral epithelial dysplasia.
Brothwell DJ; Lewis DW; Bradley G; Leong I; Jordan RC; Mock D; Leake JL
Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2003 Aug; 31(4):300-5. PubMed ID: 12846853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intra-observer and inter-observer variability in two grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia: A multi-centre study in India.
Ranganathan K; Kavitha L; Sharada P; Bavle RM; Rao RS; Pattanshetty SM; Hazarey VK; Madhura MG; Nagaraj T; Lingappa A; Warnakulasuriya S
J Oral Pathol Med; 2020 Oct; 49(9):948-955. PubMed ID: 32516857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Grading oral epithelial dysplasia: analysis of individual features.
Tilakaratne WM; Sherriff M; Morgan PR; Odell EW
J Oral Pathol Med; 2011 Aug; 40(7):533-40. PubMed ID: 21501232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reproducibility of the WHO/IASLC grading system for pre-invasive squamous lesions of the bronchus: a study of inter-observer and intra-observer variation.
Nicholson AG; Perry LJ; Cury PM; Jackson P; McCormick CM; Corrin B; Wells AU
Histopathology; 2001 Mar; 38(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 11260299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Inter- and intra-observer variability in three grading systems for oral epithelial dysplasia.
Krishnan L; Karpagaselvi K; Kumarswamy J; Sudheendra US; Santosh KV; Patil A
J Oral Maxillofac Pathol; 2016; 20(2):261-8. PubMed ID: 27601820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histological grading of oral epithelial dysplasia: revisited.
Warnakulasuriya S
J Pathol; 2001 Jul; 194(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 11439360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessing Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Risk for Transformation to Cancer: Comparison Between Histologic Grading Systems Versus S100A7 Immunohistochemical Signature-based Grading.
Darling MR; Hwang JTK; Dickson BJ; Cutz JC; Salama S; McCord C; Pritzker KPH; Mock D; Thompson LDR
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol; 2023 Jul; 31(6):399-405. PubMed ID: 37249075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison and evaluation of mitotic figures in oral epithelial dysplasia using crystal violet and Feulgen stain.
Rao RS; Patil S; Agarwal A
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2014 May; 15(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 25307805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The binary oral dysplasia grading system: validity testing and suggested improvement.
Nankivell P; Williams H; Matthews P; Suortamo S; Snead D; McConkey C; Mehanna H
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2013 Jan; 115(1):87-94. PubMed ID: 23217539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Ki-67 Prognostic Value in Different Histological Grades of Oral Epithelial Dysplasia and Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
Takkem A; Barakat C; Zakaraia S; Zaid K; Najmeh J; Ayoub M; Seirawan MY
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Nov; 19(11):3279-3286. PubMed ID: 30486632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Update on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in Digital Pathology for Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Research.
Alajaji SA; Khoury ZH; Jessri M; Sciubba JJ; Sultan AS
Head Neck Pathol; 2024 May; 18(1):38. PubMed ID: 38727841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oral Epithelial Dysplasia Grading Systems: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis.
Khoury ZH; Sultan M; Sultan AS
Int J Surg Pathol; 2022 Aug; 30(5):499-511. PubMed ID: 34994584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cytokeratin 19 Immunostain Reduces Variability in Grading Epithelial Dysplasia of the Non-Keratinized Upper Aerodigestive Tract Mucosa.
Safadi RA; AlRomaizan A; Alshagroud RS; Divakar DD; Alshieban S
Head Neck Pathol; 2020 Mar; 14(1):183-191. PubMed ID: 31089948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of histological grading and large-scale genomic status (DNA ploidy) as prognostic tools in oral dysplasia.
Sudbø J; Bryne M; Johannessen AC; Kildal W; Danielsen HE; Reith A
J Pathol; 2001 Jul; 194(3):303-10. PubMed ID: 11439362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
