These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22549753)

  • 1. Does a well-done analysis of poor-quality data constitute evidence of benefit?
    Barie PS
    Ann Surg; 2012 Jun; 255(6):1030-1. PubMed ID: 22549753
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Meta-analysis based on standardized effects is unreliable.
    Cummings P
    Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2004 Jun; 158(6):595-7. PubMed ID: 15184227
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Statistical methods for assessing the influence of study characteristics on treatment effects in 'meta-epidemiological' research.
    Sterne JA; Jüni P; Schulz KF; Altman DG; Bartlett C; Egger M
    Stat Med; 2002 Jun; 21(11):1513-24. PubMed ID: 12111917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Five easy pieces on evidence-based medicine (4).
    Kalso E; Edwards J; McQuay HJ; Moore RA
    Eur J Pain; 2002; 6(1):89-93. PubMed ID: 11888232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Meta-analysis of hyperoxia to prevent surgical site infection.
    Meyhoff CS; Jorgensen LN; Rasmussen LS; Wetterslev J
    J Am Coll Surg; 2011 May; 212(5):909; author reply 909-10. PubMed ID: 21530851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Statistical methods can be improved within Cochrane pregnancy and childbirth reviews.
    Riley RD; Gates S; Neilson J; Alfirevic Z
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):608-18. PubMed ID: 21109399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PRISMA.
    Blegen MA
    Nurs Res; 2010; 59(4):233. PubMed ID: 20585220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: scientific rationale and interpretation.
    Ferreira González I; Urrútia G; Alonso-Coello P
    Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 Aug; 64(8):688-96. PubMed ID: 21719182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Literature reviews: evolution of a research methodology.
    Evans D; Kowanko I
    Aust J Adv Nurs; 2000 Dec-2001 Feb; 18(2):33-8. PubMed ID: 11878498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Meta-analysis: the art of the systematic overview].
    Veldhuyzen van Zanten SJ; Boers M
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1993 Aug; 137(32):1594-9. PubMed ID: 8366959
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Standard operating procedures.
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1299. PubMed ID: 17093453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Do antibiotics reduce the frequency of surgical site infections after impacted mandibular third molar surgery?
    Susarla SM; Sharaf B; Dodson TB
    Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2011 Nov; 23(4):541-6, vi. PubMed ID: 21982606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Climate change in endodontics: is it time to recycle "garbage in-garbage out" systematic reviews?
    Fedorowicz Z; Sequeira-Byron P; Jagannath V; Sharif MO
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Oct; 112(4):515-7. PubMed ID: 21546284
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The need for standards, not guidelines, in biological data reporting and sharing.
    Burgoon LD
    Nat Biotechnol; 2006 Nov; 24(11):1369-73. PubMed ID: 17093486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evidence-based dental care--a concept review.
    Nainar SM
    Pediatr Dent; 1998; 20(7):418-21. PubMed ID: 9866146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Risk factors of surgical wound infection].
    Bay-Nielsen M
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1996 Oct; 158(41):5749-53. PubMed ID: 8928262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to ensure your paper is rejected by the statistical reviewer.
    Stratton IM; Neil A
    Diabet Med; 2005 Apr; 22(4):371-3. PubMed ID: 15787658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reproducible research and the substantive context.
    Keiding N
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):376-8. PubMed ID: 20498225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Commentary.
    Breslow NE
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):379-80. PubMed ID: 20538870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Discussion of Keiding.
    Peng RD
    Biostatistics; 2010 Jul; 11(3):393-4. PubMed ID: 20538876
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.