453 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22550312)
1. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.
Rosenkrantz AB; Sigmund EE; Johnson G; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Lee VS; Jensen JH
Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22550312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. T2* relaxation time in the detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer in comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging.
Wu LM; Zhou B; Lu Q; Suo ST; Liu Q; Hu J; Haccke EM; Chen XX; Xu JR
Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 26823021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population.
Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of prostate cancer in peripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T.
Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Luo X; Zhou C
Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 23892233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Hambrock T; Somford DM; Huisman HJ; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Scheenen T; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 21502392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion tensor imaging of prostate at 3.0 Tesla.
Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Liu M; Zhou C
Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):813-7. PubMed ID: 21586608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings.
Mazaheri Y; Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Fine SW; Zhang J; Inurrigarro G; Moskowitz CS; Ishill NM; Reuter VE; Touijer K; Zakian KL; Koutcher JA
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 18227542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models.
Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB
Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28394755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of diffusional kurtosis imaging as a marker of adverse pathologic outcomes among prostate cancer active surveillance candidates undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Rosenkrantz AB; Prabhu V; Sigmund EE; Babb JS; Deng FM; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 24059373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy.
Woodfield CA; Tung GA; Grand DJ; Pezzullo JA; Machan JT; Renzulli JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):W316-22. PubMed ID: 20308476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer: comparison of tumor visibility on trace diffusion-weighted images and the apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kong X; Niver BE; Berkman DS; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 21178056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpatient variation in normal peripheral zone apparent diffusion coefficient: effect on the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness.
Litjens GJ; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO; Huisman HJ
Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 22923722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined.
Chen M; Dang HD; Wang JY; Zhou C; Li SY; Wang WC; Zhao WF; Yang ZH; Zhong CY; Li GZ
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 18568549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection and localization.
Yağci AB; Ozari N; Aybek Z; Düzcan E
Diagn Interv Radiol; 2011 Jun; 17(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 20694948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging.
Hoeks CM; Hambrock T; Yakar D; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Feuth T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 23143029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.
Vargas HA; Akin O; Franiel T; Mazaheri Y; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Udo K; Eastham J; Hricak H
Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 21436085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
