These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
455 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22550312)
1. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. Rosenkrantz AB; Sigmund EE; Johnson G; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Lee VS; Jensen JH Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22550312 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. T2* relaxation time in the detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer in comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging. Wu LM; Zhou B; Lu Q; Suo ST; Liu Q; Hu J; Haccke EM; Chen XX; Xu JR Clin Radiol; 2016 Apr; 71(4):356-62. PubMed ID: 26823021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer. Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic evaluation of diffusion kurtosis imaging for prostate cancer: Detection in a biopsy population. Ding K; Yao Y; Gao Y; Lu X; Chen H; Tang Q; Hua C; Zhou M; Zou X; Yin Q Eur J Radiol; 2019 Sep; 118():138-146. PubMed ID: 31439233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer. Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Detection of prostate cancer in peripheral zone: comparison of MR diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI, and the two techniques combined at 3.0 T. Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Luo X; Zhou C Acta Radiol; 2014 Mar; 55(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 23892233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer. Hambrock T; Somford DM; Huisman HJ; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Scheenen T; Barentsz JO Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 21502392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diffusion tensor imaging of prostate at 3.0 Tesla. Li C; Chen M; Li S; Zhao X; Zhang C; Liu M; Zhou C Acta Radiol; 2011 Sep; 52(7):813-7. PubMed ID: 21586608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings. Mazaheri Y; Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Fine SW; Zhang J; Inurrigarro G; Moskowitz CS; Ishill NM; Reuter VE; Touijer K; Zakian KL; Koutcher JA Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 18227542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate Cancer: Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness-Comparison between Conventional and Kurtosis Models. Tamada T; Prabhu V; Li J; Babb JS; Taneja SS; Rosenkrantz AB Radiology; 2017 Jul; 284(1):100-108. PubMed ID: 28394755 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prostate cancer vs. post-biopsy hemorrhage: diagnosis with T2- and diffusion-weighted imaging. Rosenkrantz AB; Kopec M; Kong X; Melamed J; Dakwar G; Babb JS; Taouli B J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jun; 31(6):1387-94. PubMed ID: 20512891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade. Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of diffusional kurtosis imaging as a marker of adverse pathologic outcomes among prostate cancer active surveillance candidates undergoing radical prostatectomy. Rosenkrantz AB; Prabhu V; Sigmund EE; Babb JS; Deng FM; Taneja SS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):840-6. PubMed ID: 24059373 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy. Woodfield CA; Tung GA; Grand DJ; Pezzullo JA; Machan JT; Renzulli JF AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):W316-22. PubMed ID: 20308476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate cancer: comparison of tumor visibility on trace diffusion-weighted images and the apparent diffusion coefficient map. Rosenkrantz AB; Kong X; Niver BE; Berkman DS; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 21178056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Interpatient variation in normal peripheral zone apparent diffusion coefficient: effect on the prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness. Litjens GJ; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa C; Barentsz JO; Huisman HJ Radiology; 2012 Oct; 265(1):260-6. PubMed ID: 22923722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer detection: comparison of T2-weighted imaging, diffusion-weighted imaging, proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, and the three techniques combined. Chen M; Dang HD; Wang JY; Zhou C; Li SY; Wang WC; Zhao WF; Yang ZH; Zhong CY; Li GZ Acta Radiol; 2008 Jun; 49(5):602-10. PubMed ID: 18568549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The value of diffusion-weighted MRI for prostate cancer detection and localization. Yağci AB; Ozari N; Aybek Z; Düzcan E Diagn Interv Radiol; 2011 Jun; 17(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 20694948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametric MR imaging. Hoeks CM; Hambrock T; Yakar D; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Feuth T; Witjes JA; Fütterer JJ; Barentsz JO Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):207-17. PubMed ID: 23143029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. Vargas HA; Akin O; Franiel T; Mazaheri Y; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Udo K; Eastham J; Hricak H Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):775-84. PubMed ID: 21436085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]