These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22551229)

  • 1. Maximum Parsimony on Phylogenetic networks.
    Kannan L; Wheeler WC
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2012 May; 7(1):9. PubMed ID: 22551229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Exactly computing the parsimony scores on phylogenetic networks using dynamic programming.
    Kannan L; Wheeler WC
    J Comput Biol; 2014 Apr; 21(4):303-19. PubMed ID: 24559134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Treewidth-based algorithms for the small parsimony problem on networks.
    Scornavacca C; Weller M
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2022 Aug; 17(1):15. PubMed ID: 35987645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bounding the Softwired Parsimony Score of a Phylogenetic Network.
    Döcker J; Linz S; Wicke K
    Bull Math Biol; 2024 Aug; 86(10):121. PubMed ID: 39174812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Phylogenetic network analysis as a parsimony optimization problem.
    Wheeler WC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16():296. PubMed ID: 26382078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Towards improving searches for optimal phylogenies.
    Ford E; St John K; Wheeler WC
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 25164916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Embedding gene trees into phylogenetic networks by conflict resolution algorithms.
    Wawerka M; Dąbkowski D; Rutecka N; Mykowiecka A; Górecki P
    Algorithms Mol Biol; 2022 May; 17(1):11. PubMed ID: 35590416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reconstructing phylogenetic networks using maximum parsimony.
    Nakhleh L; Jin G; Zhao F; Mellor-Crummey J
    Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf; 2005; ():93-102. PubMed ID: 16447967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Phylogenetic Networks perspective on reticulate human evolution.
    Caparros M; Prat S
    iScience; 2021 Apr; 24(4):102359. PubMed ID: 33898948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the quirks of maximum parsimony and likelihood on phylogenetic networks.
    Bryant C; Fischer M; Linz S; Semple C
    J Theor Biol; 2017 Mar; 417():100-108. PubMed ID: 28087420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Algorithms for reticulate networks of multiple phylogenetic trees.
    Chen ZZ; Wang L
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2012; 9(2):372-84. PubMed ID: 22025766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Close lower and upper bounds for the minimum reticulate network of multiple phylogenetic trees.
    Wu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i140-8. PubMed ID: 20529899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inferring phylogenetic networks by the maximum parsimony criterion: a case study.
    Jin G; Nakhleh L; Snir S; Tuller T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Jan; 24(1):324-37. PubMed ID: 17068107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Finding a most parsimonious or likely tree in a network with respect to an alignment.
    Kelk S; Pardi F; Scornavacca C; van Iersel L
    J Math Biol; 2019 Jan; 78(1-2):527-547. PubMed ID: 30121824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using tree diversity to compare phylogenetic heuristics.
    Sul SJ; Matthews S; Williams TL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 10 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):S3. PubMed ID: 19426451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Applicability of several rooted phylogenetic network algorithms for representing the evolutionary history of SARS-CoV-2.
    Wallin R; van Iersel L; Kelk S; Stougie L
    BMC Ecol Evol; 2021 Dec; 21(1):220. PubMed ID: 34876022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An algorithm for constructing parsimonious hybridization networks with multiple phylogenetic trees.
    Wu Y
    J Comput Biol; 2013 Oct; 20(10):792-804. PubMed ID: 24093230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Binets: Fundamental Building Blocks for Phylogenetic Networks.
    van Iersel L; Moulton V; de Swart E; Wu T
    Bull Math Biol; 2017 May; 79(5):1135-1154. PubMed ID: 28386669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phylogenetic networks do not need to be complex: using fewer reticulations to represent conflicting clusters.
    van Iersel L; Kelk S; Rupp R; Huson D
    Bioinformatics; 2010 Jun; 26(12):i124-31. PubMed ID: 20529896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How much information is needed to infer reticulate evolutionary histories?
    Huber KT; Van Iersel L; Moulton V; Wu T
    Syst Biol; 2015 Jan; 64(1):102-11. PubMed ID: 25236959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.