222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22551868)
1. Beef production in balance: considerations for life cycle analyses.
Place SE; Mitloehner FM
Meat Sci; 2012 Nov; 92(3):179-81. PubMed ID: 22551868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Carbon footprint and ammonia emissions of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4641-55. PubMed ID: 22952361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Growth-promoting technologies decrease the carbon footprint, ammonia emissions, and costs of California beef production systems.
Stackhouse KR; Rotz CA; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM
J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(12):4656-65. PubMed ID: 22952364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trends in greenhouse gas emissions from consumption and production of animal food products - implications for long-term climate targets.
Cederberg C; Hedenus F; Wirsenius S; Sonesson U
Animal; 2013 Feb; 7(2):330-40. PubMed ID: 23031741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Including carbon emissions from deforestation in the carbon footprint of Brazilian beef.
Cederberg C; Persson UM; Neovius K; Molander S; Clift R
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(5):1773-9. PubMed ID: 21280649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas analysis of a large-scale vertically integrated organic dairy in the United States.
Heller MC; Keoleian GA
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Mar; 45(5):1903-10. PubMed ID: 21348530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Climate mitigation by dairy intensification depends on intensive use of spared grassland.
Styles D; Gonzalez-Mejia A; Moorby J; Foskolos A; Gibbons J
Glob Chang Biol; 2018 Feb; 24(2):681-693. PubMed ID: 28940511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Emissions savings in the corn-ethanol life cycle from feeding coproducts to livestock.
Bremer VR; Liska AJ; Klopfenstein TJ; Erickson GE; Yang HS; Walters DT; Cassman KG
J Environ Qual; 2010; 39(2):472-82. PubMed ID: 20176820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Carbon footprint of organic beef meat from farm to fork: a case study of short supply chain.
Vitali A; Grossi G; Martino G; Bernabucci U; Nardone A; Lacetera N
J Sci Food Agric; 2018 Nov; 98(14):5518-5524. PubMed ID: 29691877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Sustainability of meat production beyond carbon footprint: a synthesis of case studies from grazing systems in Uruguay.
Picasso VD; Modernel PD; Becoña G; Salvo L; Gutiérrez L; Astigarraga L
Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 25048094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methods and consequences of including reduction in greenhouse gas emission in beef cattle multiple-trait selection.
Barwick SA; Henzell AL; Herd RM; Walmsley BJ; Arthur PF
Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Apr; 51(1):18. PubMed ID: 31035930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Red meat production in australia: life cycle assessment and comparison with overseas studies.
Peters GM; Rowley HV; Wiedemann S; Tucker R; Short MD; Schulz M
Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Feb; 44(4):1327-32. PubMed ID: 20067280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Carbon footprint of Breton pâté production: a case study.
Teixeira R; Himeno A; Gustavus L
Integr Environ Assess Manag; 2013 Oct; 9(4):645-51. PubMed ID: 23801646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of the effect of accounting method, IPCC v. LCA, on grass-based and confinement dairy systems' greenhouse gas emissions.
O'Brien D; Shalloo L; Patton J; Buckley F; Grainger C; Wallace M
Animal; 2012 Sep; 6(9):1512-27. PubMed ID: 23031525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Carbon footprint of conventional and organic beef production systems: An Italian case study.
Buratti C; Fantozzi F; Barbanera M; Lascaro E; Chiorri M; Cecchini L
Sci Total Environ; 2017 Jan; 576():129-137. PubMed ID: 27783931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The carbon footprint of dairy production systems through partial life cycle assessment.
Rotz CA; Montes F; Chianese DS
J Dairy Sci; 2010 Mar; 93(3):1266-82. PubMed ID: 20172247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Brazilian beef produced on pastures: sustainable and healthy.
Lobato JF; Freitas AK; Devincenzi T; Cardoso LL; Tarouco JU; Vieira RM; Dillenburg DR; Castro I
Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):336-45. PubMed ID: 25017318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Anaerobic digestion of agricultural and other substrates--implications for greenhouse gas emissions.
Pucker J; Jungmeier G; Siegl S; Pötsch EM
Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():283-91. PubMed ID: 23739470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Life cycle assessment of energy self-sufficiency systems based on agricultural residues for organic arable farms.
Kimming M; Sundberg C; Nordberg A; Baky A; Bernesson S; Norén O; Hansson PA
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):1425-32. PubMed ID: 20970998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pomace waste management scenarios in Québec--impact on greenhouse gas emissions.
Gassara F; Brar SK; Pelletier F; Verma M; Godbout S; Tyagi RD
J Hazard Mater; 2011 Sep; 192(3):1178-85. PubMed ID: 21733627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
