These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22551868)

  • 21. Life-cycle assessment of the beef cattle production system for the northern great plains, USA.
    Lupo CD; Clay DE; Benning JL; Stone JJ
    J Environ Qual; 2013 Sep; 42(5):1386-94. PubMed ID: 24216416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Effect of farming practices for greenhouse gas mitigation and subsequent alternative land use on environmental impacts of beef cattle production systems.
    Nguyen TT; Doreau M; Eugène M; Corson MS; Garcia-Launay F; Chesneau G; van der Werf HM
    Animal; 2013 May; 7(5):860-9. PubMed ID: 23190866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. LIFE BEEF CARBON: a common framework for quantifying grass and corn based beef farms' carbon footprints.
    O'Brien D; Herron J; Andurand J; Caré S; Martinez P; Migliorati L; Moro M; Pirlo G; Dollé JB
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):834-845. PubMed ID: 31666147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A simulation-based approach for evaluating and comparing the environmental footprints of beef production systems.
    Rotz CA; Isenberg BJ; Stackhouse-Lawson KR; Pollak EJ
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Nov; 91(11):5427-37. PubMed ID: 24146148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A case study of the carbon footprint of milk from high-performing confinement and grass-based dairy farms.
    O'Brien D; Capper JL; Garnsworthy PC; Grainger C; Shalloo L
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 Mar; 97(3):1835-51. PubMed ID: 24440256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The relevance of methane emissions from beef production and the challenges of the Argentinean beef production platform.
    Rearte DH; Pordomingo AJ
    Meat Sci; 2014 Nov; 98(3):355-60. PubMed ID: 25027797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Greenhouse gas emissions from conventional, agri-environmental scheme, and organic Irish suckler-beef units.
    Casey JW; Holden NM
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(1):231-9. PubMed ID: 16397099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Greenhouse gas emissions from forestry operations: a life cycle assessment.
    Sonne E
    J Environ Qual; 2006; 35(4):1439-50. PubMed ID: 16825464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Farm-specific carbon footprinting to the farm gate for agricultural co-products using the OVERSEER® model.
    Wheeler DM; Ledgard SF; Boyes M
    Animal; 2013 Jun; 7 Suppl 2():437-43. PubMed ID: 23739485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Carbon and blue water footprints of California sheep production.
    Dougherty HC; Oltjen JW; Mitloehner FM; DePeters EJ; Pettey LA; Macon D; Finzel J; Rodrigues K; Kebreab E
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Feb; 97(2):945-961. PubMed ID: 30452693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Greenhouse gas and alcohol emissions from feedlot steers and calves.
    Stackhouse KR; Pan Y; Zhao Y; Mitloehner FM
    J Environ Qual; 2011; 40(3):899-906. PubMed ID: 21546675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Broadening GHG accounting with LCA: application to a waste management business unit.
    Fallaha S; Martineau G; Bécaert V; Margni M; Deschênes L; Samson R; Aoustin E
    Waste Manag Res; 2009 Nov; 27(9):885-93. PubMed ID: 19854813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Greenhouse gases emissions from waste management practices using Life Cycle Inventory model.
    Chen TC; Lin CF
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 155(1-2):23-31. PubMed ID: 18164811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management with regard to greenhouse gas emissions: case study of Tianjin, China.
    Zhao W; van der Voet E; Zhang Y; Huppes G
    Sci Total Environ; 2009 Feb; 407(5):1517-26. PubMed ID: 19068268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The effects of recycling loops in food waste management in Japan: based on the environmental and economic evaluation of food recycling.
    Takata M; Fukushima K; Kino-Kimata N; Nagao N; Niwa C; Toda T
    Sci Total Environ; 2012 Aug; 432():309-17. PubMed ID: 22750176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Environmental impact evaluation of feeds prepared from food residues using life cycle assessment.
    Ogino A; Hirooka H; Ikeguchi A; Tanaka Y; Waki M; Yokoyama H; Kawashima T
    J Environ Qual; 2007; 36(4):1061-8. PubMed ID: 17526885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from United States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Oct; 45(19):8182-9. PubMed ID: 21846117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of intensification of pastoral farming on greenhouse gas emissions in New Zealand.
    Pinares-Patino CS; Waghorn GC; Hegarty RS; Hoskin SO
    N Z Vet J; 2009 Oct; 57(5):252-61. PubMed ID: 19802038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The greenhouse emissions footprint of free-range eggs.
    Taylor RC; Omed H; Edwards-Jones G
    Poult Sci; 2014 Jan; 93(1):231-7. PubMed ID: 24570444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. From the LCA of food products to the environmental assessment of protected crops districts: a case-study in the south of Italy.
    Cellura M; Ardente F; Longo S
    J Environ Manage; 2012 Jan; 93(1):194-208. PubMed ID: 22054586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.