BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22552066)

  • 1. Trial tests Austrian integrity body.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2012 May; 485(7396):15. PubMed ID: 22552066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Universities scramble to assess scope of falsified results.
    Dalton R
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7064):7. PubMed ID: 16267515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidentiality is essential in misconduct inquiries.
    Mason S; Rutledge C
    Nature; 2007 Mar; 446(7135):492. PubMed ID: 17392764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Named and shamed.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2006 May; 441(7092):392-3. PubMed ID: 16724027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Research integrity: Sabotage!
    Maher B
    Nature; 2010 Sep; 467(7315):516-8. PubMed ID: 20881988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Austria: investigation likely to have serious consequences.
    Bonn G; Druml C; Fischer G; Huber C; Laske S; Smolle-Juettner F; Soyer R
    Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7214):729. PubMed ID: 18843338
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Research ethics: Zero tolerance.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2012 Jan; 481(7380):134-6. PubMed ID: 22237090
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. PhD--club or history?
    Nature; 2004 Jun; 429(6994):789. PubMed ID: 15215821
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. China introduces sweeping reforms to crack down on academic misconduct.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2018 Jun; 558(7709):171. PubMed ID: 29895918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. China cracks down on fake data in drug trials.
    Cyranoski D
    Nature; 2017 May; 545(7654):275. PubMed ID: 28516939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Japan's research conduct.
    Nature; 2006 Feb; 439(7077):634. PubMed ID: 16467795
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Misconduct? It's all academic..
    Nature; 2007 Jan; 445(7125):240-1. PubMed ID: 17230159
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Researchers break the rules in frustration at review boards.
    Giles J
    Nature; 2005 Nov; 438(7065):136-7. PubMed ID: 16280994
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Harassment should count as scientific misconduct.
    MarĂ­n-Spiotta E
    Nature; 2018 May; 557(7704):141. PubMed ID: 29743701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Misconduct: lower ranks take most of the blame.
    Clouthier SG
    Nature; 2005 Jul; 436(7050):460. PubMed ID: 16049448
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scientific misconduct: Research integrity guidelines in Japan.
    Wada M
    Nature; 2014 Oct; 514(7520):35. PubMed ID: 25279908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Keep it clean.
    Nature; 2011 Aug; 476(7360):251. PubMed ID: 21850063
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. How do Chinese universities address research integrity and misconduct? A review of university documents.
    Yi N; Nemery B; Dierickx K
    Dev World Bioeth; 2019 Jun; 19(2):64-75. PubMed ID: 31091553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Austrian ethics watchdog launched.
    Abbott A
    Nature; 2008 Dec; 456(7222):557. PubMed ID: 19052592
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Policing integrity.
    Nature; 2005 May; 435(7040):248. PubMed ID: 15902211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.