These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

972 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22554604)

  • 1. Diagnostic performance of noninvasive myocardial perfusion imaging using single-photon emission computed tomography, cardiac magnetic resonance, and positron emission tomography imaging for the detection of obstructive coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis.
    Jaarsma C; Leiner T; Bekkers SC; Crijns HJ; Wildberger JE; Nagel E; Nelemans PJ; Schalla S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2012 May; 59(19):1719-28. PubMed ID: 22554604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging for detecting hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease between cardiac magnetic resonance and nuclear medical imaging: A meta-analysis.
    Yang K; Yu SQ; Lu MJ; Zhao SH
    Int J Cardiol; 2019 Oct; 293():278-285. PubMed ID: 31303392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of significant coronary artery disease by noninvasive anatomical and functional imaging.
    Neglia D; Rovai D; Caselli C; Pietila M; Teresinska A; Aguadé-Bruix S; Pizzi MN; Todiere G; Gimelli A; Schroeder S; Drosch T; Poddighe R; Casolo G; Anagnostopoulos C; Pugliese F; Rouzet F; Le Guludec D; Cappelli F; Valente S; Gensini GF; Zawaideh C; Capitanio S; Sambuceti G; Marsico F; Perrone Filardi P; Fernández-Golfín C; Rincón LM; Graner FP; de Graaf MA; Fiechter M; Stehli J; Gaemperli O; Reyes E; Nkomo S; Mäki M; Lorenzoni V; Turchetti G; Carpeggiani C; Marinelli M; Puzzuoli S; Mangione M; Marcheschi P; Mariani F; Giannessi D; Nekolla S; Lombardi M; Sicari R; Scholte AJ; Zamorano JL; Kaufmann PA; Underwood SR; Knuuti J;
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Mar; 8(3):. PubMed ID: 25711274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic Performance of Hybrid Cardiac Imaging Methods for Assessment of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease Compared With Stand-Alone Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: A Meta-Analysis.
    Rizvi A; Han D; Danad I; Ó Hartaigh B; Lee JH; Gransar H; Stuijfzand WJ; Roudsari HM; Park MW; Szymonifka J; Chang HJ; Jones EC; Knaapen P; Lin FY; Min JK; Peña JM
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 11(4):589-599. PubMed ID: 28823745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(12):1-38. PubMed ID: 23074389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of stress myocardial perfusion imaging compared to invasive coronary angiography with fractional flow reserve meta-analysis.
    Takx RA; Blomberg BA; El Aidi H; Habets J; de Jong PA; Nagel E; Hoffmann U; Leiner T
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 8(1):. PubMed ID: 25596143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2010; 10(8):1-64. PubMed ID: 23074411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance vs SPECT Imaging for Detection of Coronary Artery Disease.
    Arai AE; Schulz-Menger J; Shah DJ; Han Y; Bandettini WP; Abraham A; Woodard PK; Selvanayagam JB; Hamilton-Craig C; Tan RS; Carr J; Teo L; Kramer CM; Wintersperger BJ; Harisinghani MG; Flamm SD; Friedrich MG; Klem I; Raman SV; Haverstock D; Liu Z; Brueggenwerth G; Santiuste M; Berman DS; Pennell DJ
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2023 Nov; 82(19):1828-1838. PubMed ID: 37914512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Performance of Coronary CT Angiography and Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Kidney Transplantation Candidates.
    Winther S; Svensson M; Jørgensen HS; Bouchelouche K; Gormsen LC; Pedersen BB; Holm NR; Bøtker HE; Ivarsen P; Bøttcher M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 May; 8(5):553-562. PubMed ID: 25869350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Enhanced diagnostic utility achieved by myocardial blood analysis: A meta-analysis of noninvasive cardiac imaging in the detection of functional coronary artery disease.
    Dai N; Zhang X; Zhang Y; Hou L; Li W; Fan B; Zhang T; Xu Y
    Int J Cardiol; 2016 Oct; 221():665-73. PubMed ID: 27423088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.
    Mordini FE; Haddad T; Hsu LY; Kellman P; Lowrey TB; Aletras AH; Bandettini WP; Arai AE
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):14-22. PubMed ID: 24433707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Second-Line Myocardial Perfusion Imaging to Detect Obstructive Stenosis: Head-to-Head Comparison of CMR and PET.
    Rasmussen LD; Winther S; Eftekhari A; Karim SR; Westra J; Isaksen C; Brix L; Ejlersen JA; Murphy T; Milidonis X; Nyegaard M; Benovoy M; Johansen JK; Søndergaard HM; Hammid O; Mortensen J; Knudsen LL; Gormsen LC; Christiansen EH; Chiribiri A; Petersen SE; Böttcher M
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 May; 16(5):642-655. PubMed ID: 36881421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Qualitative assessments of myocardial ischemia by cardiac MRI and coronary stenosis by invasive coronary angiography in relation to quantitative perfusion by positron emission tomography in patients with known or suspected stable coronary artery disease.
    Akil S; Hedeer F; Carlsson M; Arheden H; Oddstig J; Hindorf C; Jögi J; Erlinge D; Engblom H
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2020 Dec; 27(6):2351-2359. PubMed ID: 30535919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Phase II safety and clinical comparison with single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for detection of coronary artery disease: flurpiridaz F 18 positron emission tomography.
    Berman DS; Maddahi J; Tamarappoo BK; Czernin J; Taillefer R; Udelson JE; Gibson CM; Devine M; Lazewatsky J; Bhat G; Washburn D
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2013 Jan; 61(4):469-477. PubMed ID: 23265345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CAD detection in patients with intermediate-high pre-test probability: low-dose CT delayed enhancement detects ischemic myocardial scar with moderate accuracy but does not improve performance of a stress-rest CT perfusion protocol.
    Bettencourt N; Ferreira ND; Leite D; Carvalho M; Ferreira WDS; Schuster A; Chiribiri A; Leite-Moreira A; Silva-Cardoso J; Nagel E; Gama V
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1062-1071. PubMed ID: 24011773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.
    Medical Advisory Secretariat
    Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(16):1-167. PubMed ID: 23074467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial.
    Schwitter J; Wacker CM; Wilke N; Al-Saadi N; Sauer E; Huettle K; Schönberg SO; Luchner A; Strohm O; Ahlstrom H; Dill T; Hoebel N; Simor T;
    Eur Heart J; 2013 Mar; 34(10):775-81. PubMed ID: 22390914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic review and modelling of the cost-effectiveness of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging compared with current existing testing pathways in ischaemic cardiomyopathy.
    Campbell F; Thokala P; Uttley LC; Sutton A; Sutton AJ; Al-Mohammad A; Thomas SM
    Health Technol Assess; 2014 Sep; 18(59):1-120. PubMed ID: 25265259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Differentiation of myocardial ischemia and infarction assessed by dynamic computed tomography perfusion imaging and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography.
    Tanabe Y; Kido T; Uetani T; Kurata A; Kono T; Ogimoto A; Miyagawa M; Soma T; Murase K; Iwaki H; Mochizuki T
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Nov; 26(11):3790-3801. PubMed ID: 26852220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diagnostic accuracy of dynamic CZT-SPECT in coronary artery disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Panjer M; Dobrolinska M; Wagenaar NRL; Slart RHJA
    J Nucl Cardiol; 2022 Aug; 29(4):1686-1697. PubMed ID: 34350553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.