These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22554754)
1. Influence of thermoplastic retainers on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus adhesion. Türköz C; Canigür Bavbek N; Kale Varlik S; Akça G Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 May; 141(5):598-603. PubMed ID: 22554754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers. Eroglu AK; Baka ZM; Arslan U Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of changes in salivary mutans streptococci after orthodontic treatment. Jung WS; Kim H; Park SY; Cho EJ; Ahn SJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 May; 145(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 24785924 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Streptococcus mutans counts in patients wearing removable retainers with silver nanoparticles vs those wearing conventional retainers: A randomized clinical trial. Farhadian N; Usefi Mashoof R; Khanizadeh S; Ghaderi E; Farhadian M; Miresmaeili A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb; 149(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 26827971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts. Dinçer M; Isik Aslan B Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):6-10. PubMed ID: 19726491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An assessment of the effectiveness of mechanical and chemical cleaning of Essix orthodontic retainer. Chang CS; Al-Awadi S; Ready D; Noar J J Orthod; 2014 Jun; 41(2):110-7. PubMed ID: 24536071 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical evaluation of salivary indices and levels of Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus in patients treated with Occlus-o-Guide. Mummolo S; Tieri M; Tecco S; Mattei A; Albani F; Giuca MR; Marzo G Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Dec; 15(4):367-70. PubMed ID: 25517581 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in the oral environment after placement of lingual and labial orthodontic appliances. Lombardo L; Ortan YÖ; Gorgun Ö; Panza C; Scuzzo G; Siciliani G Prog Orthod; 2013 Sep; 14():28. PubMed ID: 24326120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effectiveness and acceptability of Essix and Begg retainers: a prospective study. Kumar AG; Bansal A Aust Orthod J; 2011 May; 27(1):52-6. PubMed ID: 21696115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in patients with conventional and self-ligating brackets. Pandis N; Papaioannou W; Kontou E; Nakou M; Makou M; Eliades T Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 19474229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Salivary Streptococcus Mutans and Lactobacillus spp. levels in patients during rapid palatal expansion. Ortu E; Sgolastra F; Barone A; Gatto R; Marzo G; Monaco A Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 25306143 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computerized occlusal analysis of Essix and Hawley retainers used during the retention phase: a controlled clinical trial. Alkan Ö; Kaya Y; Keskin S J Orofac Orthop; 2020 Sep; 81(5):371-381. PubMed ID: 32472340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In-vivo evaluation of the contamination of Super Slick elastomeric rings by Streptococcus mutans in orthodontic patients. Magno AF; Enoki C; Ito IY; Matsumoto MA; Faria G; Nelson-Filho P Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4 Suppl):S104-9. PubMed ID: 18407016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Isolation and characterization of Lactobacillus species inhibiting the formation of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. Chung J; Ha ES; Park HR; Kim S Oral Microbiol Immunol; 2004 Jun; 19(3):214-6. PubMed ID: 15107076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Saliva-promoted adhesion of Streptococcus mutans MT8148 associates with dental plaque and caries experience. Shimotoyodome A; Kobayashi H; Tokimitsu I; Hase T; Inoue T; Matsukubo T; Takaesu Y Caries Res; 2007; 41(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 17426402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Archwire ligation techniques, microbial colonization, and periodontal status in orthodontically treated patients. Türkkahraman H; Sayin MO; Bozkurt FY; Yetkin Z; Kaya S; Onal S Angle Orthod; 2005 Mar; 75(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 15825788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the effects of modified and full-coverage thermoplastic retainers on occlusal contacts. Aslan BI; Dinçer M; Salmanli O; Qasem MA Orthodontics (Chic.); 2013; 14(1):e198-208. PubMed ID: 23646330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Physiological and Immunological Changes Associated with Oral Microbiota When Using a Thermoplastic Retainer. Al-Lehaibi WK; Al-Makhzomi KA; Mohammed HS; Enezei HH; Alam MK Molecules; 2021 Mar; 26(7):. PubMed ID: 33808410 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of sample type and collection method on Streptococcus mutans and Lactobacillus spp. counts in the oral cavity. Motisuki C; Lima LM; Spolidorio DM; Santos-Pinto L Arch Oral Biol; 2005 Mar; 50(3):341-5. PubMed ID: 15740713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone versus dead-soft coaxial bonded retainers: a randomized clinical trial. Part 2: periodontal health and microbial biofilm assessment. Jasim ES; Kadhum AS Eur J Orthod; 2024 Oct; 46(5):. PubMed ID: 39312715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]