173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22554872)
1. Evaluation of four oral fluid devices (DDS®, Drugtest 5000®, Drugwipe 5+® and RapidSTAT®) for on-site monitoring drugged driving in comparison with UHPLC-MS/MS analysis.
Strano-Rossi S; Castrignanò E; Anzillotti L; Serpelloni G; Mollica R; Tagliaro F; Pascali JP; di Stefano D; Sgalla R; Chiarotti M
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):70-6. PubMed ID: 22554872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of on-site oral fluid screening using Drugwipe-5(+), RapidSTAT and Drug Test 5000 for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers.
Wille SM; Samyn N; Ramírez-Fernández Mdel M; De Boeck G
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 May; 198(1-3):2-6. PubMed ID: 19913376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance evaluation of on-site oral fluid drug screening devices in normal police procedure in Germany.
Musshoff F; Hokamp EG; Bott U; Madea B
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():120-4. PubMed ID: 24699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Roadside oral fluid testing: comparison of the results of drugwipe 5 and drugwipe benzodiazepines on-site tests with laboratory confirmation results of oral fluid and whole blood.
Pehrsson A; Gunnar T; Engblom C; Seppä H; Jama A; Lillsunde P
Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):140-8. PubMed ID: 17640837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An analytical evaluation of eight on-site oral fluid drug screening devices using laboratory confirmation results from oral fluid.
Blencowe T; Pehrsson A; Lillsunde P; Vimpari K; Houwing S; Smink B; Mathijssen R; Van der Linden T; Legrand SA; Pil K; Verstraete A
Forensic Sci Int; 2011 May; 208(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 21183299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of RapidSTAT®, DrugWipe® 6S, DrugScreen® 5TK and DrugScreen® 7TR for on-site drug testing in German police roadside traffic patrol.
Liut J; Bott U; Madea B; Krämer M; Maas A
Drug Test Anal; 2022 Aug; 14(8):1407-1416. PubMed ID: 35343088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Laboratory evaluation and field application of roadside oral fluid collectors and drug testing devices.
Crouch DJ; Walsh JM; Cangianelli L; Quintela O
Ther Drug Monit; 2008 Apr; 30(2):188-95. PubMed ID: 18367979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Confirmation by LC-MS of drugs in oral fluid obtained from roadside testing.
Concheiro M; de Castro A; Quintela O; Cruz A; López-Rivadulla M
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):156-62. PubMed ID: 17658709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations determined by LC-MS-MS in oral fluid and plasma from impaired drivers and evaluation of the on-site Dräger DrugTest.
Laloup M; Del Mar Ramirez Fernandez M; Wood M; De Boeck G; Maes V; Samyn N
Forensic Sci Int; 2006 Sep; 161(2-3):175-9. PubMed ID: 16842950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analytical evaluation of four on-site oral fluid drug testing devices.
Vanstechelman S; Isalberti C; Van der Linden T; Pil K; Legrand SA; Verstraete AG
J Anal Toxicol; 2012 Mar; 36(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 22337784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Detection of drugs of abuse in simultaneously collected oral fluid, urine and blood from Norwegian drug drivers.
Vindenes V; Lund HM; Andresen W; Gjerde H; Ikdahl SE; Christophersen AS; Øiestad EL
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Jun; 219(1-3):165-71. PubMed ID: 22284072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drugs in oral fluid in randomly selected drivers.
Drummer OH; Gerostamoulos D; Chu M; Swann P; Boorman M; Cairns I
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):105-10. PubMed ID: 17658711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Driving under the influence of drugs -- evaluation of analytical data of drugs in oral fluid, serum and urine, and correlation with impairment symptoms.
Toennes SW; Kauert GF; Steinmeyer S; Moeller MR
Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Sep; 152(2-3):149-55. PubMed ID: 15978340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The detection of THC, CBD and CBN in the oral fluid of Sativex® patients using two on-site screening tests and LC-MS/MS.
Molnar A; Fu S; Lewis J; Allsop DJ; Copeland J
Forensic Sci Int; 2014 May; 238():113-9. PubMed ID: 24699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of three rapid oral fluid test devices on the screening of multiple drugs of abuse including ketamine.
Tang MHY; Ching CK; Poon S; Chan SSS; Ng WY; Lam M; Wong CK; Pao R; Lau A; Mak TWL
Forensic Sci Int; 2018 May; 286():113-120. PubMed ID: 29574346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of oral fluid and sweat wipes for the detection of drugs of abuse in drivers.
Samyn N; De Boeck G; Verstraete AG
J Forensic Sci; 2002 Nov; 47(6):1380-7. PubMed ID: 12455668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Development and validation of the Cozart DDS oral fluid collection device.
Speedy T; Baldwin D; Jowett G; Gallina M; Jehanli A
Forensic Sci Int; 2007 Aug; 170(2-3):117-20. PubMed ID: 17624706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Supported liquid extraction (SLE) for the analysis of methylamphetamine, methylenedioxymethylamphetamine and delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol in oral fluid and blood of drivers.
Rositano J; Harpas P; Kostakis C; Scott T
Forensic Sci Int; 2016 Aug; 265():125-30. PubMed ID: 26878366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cannabinoids determination in oral fluid by SPME-GC/MS and UHPLC-MS/MS and its application on suspected drivers.
Anzillotti L; Castrignanò E; Strano Rossi S; Chiarotti M
Sci Justice; 2014 Dec; 54(6):421-6. PubMed ID: 25498928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The incidence of drugs of impairment in oral fluid from random roadside testing.
Chu M; Gerostamoulos D; Beyer J; Rodda L; Boorman M; Drummer OH
Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Feb; 215(1-3):28-31. PubMed ID: 21665392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
