313 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22555102)
1. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy in women with high grade endometrial cancer: a multi-site study performed at high volume cancer centers.
Fader AN; Seamon LG; Escobar PF; Frasure HE; Havrilesky LA; Zanotti KM; Secord AA; Boggess JF; Cohn DE; Fowler JM; Skafianos G; Rossi E; Gehrig PA
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Aug; 126(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 22555102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A cohort study evaluating robotic versus laparotomy surgical outcomes of obese women with endometrial carcinoma.
Subramaniam A; Kim KH; Bryant SA; Zhang B; Sikes C; Kimball KJ; Kilgore LC; Huh WK; Straughn JM; Alvarez RD
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Sep; 122(3):604-7. PubMed ID: 21658752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical management of early-stage endometrial cancer in the elderly: is laparoscopy feasible?
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Dec; 83(3):563-8. PubMed ID: 11733973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Long-term oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in high-risk endometrial cancer.
Koskas M; Jozwiak M; Fournier M; Vergote I; Trum H; Lok C; Amant F
Eur J Cancer; 2016 Sep; 65():185-91. PubMed ID: 27505629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between 155 cases of robotic vs. 150 cases of open surgical staging for endometrial cancer.
ElSahwi KS; Hooper C; De Leon MC; Gallo TN; Ratner E; Silasi DA; Santin AD; Schwartz PE; Rutherford TJ; Azodi M
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Feb; 124(2):260-4. PubMed ID: 22036203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for endometrial cancer: a minimum 3-year follow-up study.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Uccella S; Siesto G; Giudici S; Serati M; Franchi M
Ann Surg Oncol; 2010 Jan; 17(1):271-8. PubMed ID: 19826876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the optimal minimally invasive surgical procedure for endometrial cancer staging in the obese and morbidly obese woman?
Gehrig PA; Cantrell LA; Shafer A; Abaid LN; Mendivil A; Boggess JF
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 111(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18694588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic surgical staging for obese patients with endometrial cancer.
Tang KY; Gardiner SK; Gould C; Osmundsen B; Collins M; Winter WE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Jun; 206(6):513.e1-6. PubMed ID: 22409959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimally Invasive Approach in Type II Endometrial Cancer: Is It Wise and Safe?
Monterossi G; Ghezzi F; Vizza E; Zannoni GF; Uccella S; Corrado G; Restaino S; Quagliozzi L; Casarin J; Dinoi G; Scambia G; Fanfani F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):438-445. PubMed ID: 28065812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy for patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: experience from an institute in China.
Lu Z; Yi X; Feng W; Ding J; Xu H; Zhou X; Hua K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1011-7. PubMed ID: 22487546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost analysis of laparoscopy versus laparotomy for early endometrial cancer.
Scribner DR; Mannel RS; Walker JL; Johnson GA
Gynecol Oncol; 1999 Dec; 75(3):460-3. PubMed ID: 10600307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer: A comparison of laparotomy and minimally invasive surgery.
Vieira MA; Rendón GJ; Munsell M; Echeverri L; Frumovitz M; Schmeler KM; Pareja R; Escobar PF; Reis RD; Ramirez PT
Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Sep; 138(3):585-9. PubMed ID: 26095894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer.
Barnett JC; Havrilesky LJ; Bondurant AE; Fleming ND; Lee PS; Secord AA; Berchuck A; Valea FA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Aug; 205(2):143.e1-6. PubMed ID: 21514921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic pelvic and paraaortic lymph node dissection: analysis of the first 100 cases.
Scribner DR; Walker JL; Johnson GA; McMeekin SD; Gold MA; Mannel RS
Gynecol Oncol; 2001 Sep; 82(3):498-503. PubMed ID: 11520146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Analysis of survival after laparoscopy in women with endometrial carcinoma.
Eltabbakh GH
Cancer; 2002 Nov; 95(9):1894-901. PubMed ID: 12404283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of survival after laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer.
Nezhat F; Yadav J; Rahaman J; Gretz H; Cohen C
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(2):181-7. PubMed ID: 18312988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer.
Corrado G; Cutillo G; Pomati G; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Patrizi L; Saltari M; Vincenzoni C; Baiocco E; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Aug; 41(8):1074-81. PubMed ID: 26002986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
