These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22555901)

  • 1. Most people do not ignore salient invalid cues in memory-based decisions.
    Platzer C; Bröder A
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Aug; 19(4):654-61. PubMed ID: 22555901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Additional information is not ignored: New evidence for information integration and inhibition in take-the-best decisions.
    Dummel S; Rummel J; Voss A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Jan; 163():167-84. PubMed ID: 26687019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Strategy selection in cue-based decision making.
    Bryant DJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2014 Jun; 68(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 24884389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Verbal representation in task order control: an examination with transition and task cues in random task switching.
    Saeki E; Saito S
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):1040-50. PubMed ID: 19744942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microsaccadic modulation of response times in spatial attention tasks.
    Kliegl R; Rolfs M; Laubrock J; Engbert R
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):136-46. PubMed ID: 19066951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accessing long-term memory representations during visual change detection.
    Beck MR; van Lamsweerde AE
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Apr; 39(3):433-46. PubMed ID: 21264606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forgotten but not gone: Retro-cue costs and benefits in a double-cueing paradigm suggest multiple states in visual short-term memory.
    van Moorselaar D; Olivers CN; Theeuwes J; Lamme VA; Sligte IG
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2015 Nov; 41(6):1755-63. PubMed ID: 25867613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Express attentional re-engagement but delayed entry into consciousness following invalid spatial cues in visual search.
    Brisson B; Jolicoeur P
    PLoS One; 2008; 3(12):e3967. PubMed ID: 19088847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The flexible engagement of monitoring processes in non-focal and focal prospective memory tasks with salient cues.
    Hefer C; Cohen AL; Jaudas A; Dreisbach G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Sep; 179():42-53. PubMed ID: 28711672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions.
    Bröder A; Gaissmaier W
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Oct; 14(5):895-900. PubMed ID: 18087956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Shifting attention among working memory representations: testing cue type, awareness, and strategic control.
    Berryhill ME; Richmond LL; Shay CS; Olson IR
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):426-38. PubMed ID: 21846267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The reliability of retro-cues determines the fate of noncued visual working memory representations.
    Gunseli E; van Moorselaar D; Meeter M; Olivers CN
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1334-41. PubMed ID: 25563713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The impact of napping on memory for future-relevant stimuli: Prioritization among multiple salience cues.
    Bennion KA; Payne JD; Kensinger EA
    Behav Neurosci; 2016 Jun; 130(3):281-9. PubMed ID: 27214500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expert intuitions: how to model the decision strategies of airport customs officers?
    Pachur T; Marinello G
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 23787151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Joint attention enhances visual working memory.
    Gregory SE; Jackson MC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Feb; 43(2):237-249. PubMed ID: 27359225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Selecting a response in task switching: testing a model of compound cue retrieval.
    Schneider DW; Logan GD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):122-36. PubMed ID: 19210085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The location but not the attributes of visual cues are automatically encoded into working memory.
    Chen H; Wyble B
    Vision Res; 2015 Feb; 107():76-85. PubMed ID: 25490435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bottom-up perceptual salience and top-down retro-cues concurrently determine state in visual working memory.
    Fan L; Zhang L; Diao L; Xu M; Chen R; Zhang X
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2021 Mar; 74(3):459-470. PubMed ID: 32988297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association between cue lead time and template-for-rejection effect.
    Tanda T; Kawahara JI
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Aug; 81(6):1880-1889. PubMed ID: 31114955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cue contrast modulates the effects of exogenous attention on appearance.
    Fuller S; Park Y; Carrasco M
    Vision Res; 2009 Jul; 49(14):1825-37. PubMed ID: 19393260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.