These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22556001)

  • 1. Do healthcare report cards cause providers to select patients and raise quality of care?
    Chen Y; Meinecke J
    Health Econ; 2012 Jun; 21 Suppl 1():33-55. PubMed ID: 22556001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Why are health care report cards so bad (good)?
    Chen Y
    J Health Econ; 2011 May; 30(3):575-90. PubMed ID: 21420749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Administrative versus clinical data for coronary artery bypass graft surgery report cards: the view from California.
    Parker JP; Li Z; Damberg CL; Danielsen B; Carlisle DM
    Med Care; 2006 Jul; 44(7):687-95. PubMed ID: 16799364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Do bad report cards have consequences? Impacts of publicly reported provider quality information on the CABG market in Pennsylvania.
    Wang J; Hockenberry J; Chou SY; Yang M
    J Health Econ; 2011 Mar; 30(2):392-407. PubMed ID: 21195494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do cardiac surgery report cards reduce mortality? Assessing the evidence.
    Epstein AJ
    Med Care Res Rev; 2006 Aug; 63(4):403-26. PubMed ID: 16847071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of procedural volume on outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery in Japan: implication toward public reporting and minimal volume standards.
    Miyata H; Motomura N; Ueda Y; Matsuda H; Takamoto S
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Jun; 135(6):1306-12. PubMed ID: 18544377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of changing the statistical methodology on hospital and surgeon ranking: the case of the New York State cardiac surgery report card.
    Glance LG; Dick A; Osler TM; Li Y; Mukamel DB
    Med Care; 2006 Apr; 44(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 16565631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation criteria for report cards of healthcare providers.
    Schold JD
    Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res; 2008; 19():173-89. PubMed ID: 19548518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of the present-on-admission indicator on hospital quality measurement: experience with the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Inpatient Quality Indicators.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2008 Feb; 46(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 18219238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How well do hospital mortality rates reported in the New York State CABG report card predict subsequent hospital performance?
    Glance LG; Dick AW; Mukamel DB; Li Y; Osler TM
    Med Care; 2010 May; 48(5):466-71. PubMed ID: 20351585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is hospital procedure volume a reliable marker of quality for coronary artery bypass surgery? A comparison of risk and propensity adjusted operative and midterm outcomes.
    Zacharias A; Schwann TA; Riordan CJ; Durham SJ; Shah A; Papadimos TJ; Engoren M; Habib RH
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Jun; 79(6):1961-9. PubMed ID: 15919292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Competition and the impact of online hospital report cards.
    Chou SY; Deily ME; Li S; Lu Y
    J Health Econ; 2014 Mar; 34():42-58. PubMed ID: 24463142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of a matching algorithm to evaluate hospital coronary artery bypass grafting performance as an alternative to conventional risk adjustment.
    Glance LG; Osler TM; Mukamel DB; Dick AW
    Med Care; 2007 Apr; 45(4):292-9. PubMed ID: 17496712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The identification and development of Canadian coronary artery bypass graft surgery quality indicators.
    Guru V; Anderson GM; Fremes SE; O'Connor GT; Grover FL; Tu JV;
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Nov; 130(5):1257. PubMed ID: 16256776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ranking hospitals on surgical quality: does risk-adjustment always matter?
    Dimick JB; Birkmeyer JD
    J Am Coll Surg; 2008 Sep; 207(3):347-51. PubMed ID: 18722939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of report cards on referral patterns to cardiac surgeons.
    Epstein AJ
    J Health Econ; 2010 Sep; 29(5):718-31. PubMed ID: 20599284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimal timing of coronary artery bypass after acute myocardial infarction: a review of California discharge data.
    Weiss ES; Chang DD; Joyce DL; Nwakanma LU; Yuh DD
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2008 Mar; 135(3):503-11, 511.e1-3. PubMed ID: 18329460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of "risk-adjusted" hospital outcomes.
    Shahian DM; Normand SL
    Circulation; 2008 Apr; 117(15):1955-63. PubMed ID: 18391106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are patients with coexisting mental disorders more likely to receive CABG surgery from low-quality cardiac surgeons? The experience in New York State.
    Li Y; Glance LG; Cai X; Mukamel DB
    Med Care; 2007 Jul; 45(7):587-93. PubMed ID: 17571006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk-adjusted indices for measuring the quality of inpatient care.
    Forthman MT; Gold RS; Dove HG; Henderson RD
    Qual Manag Health Care; 2010; 19(3):265-77. PubMed ID: 20588144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.