These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22558268)

  • 1. Rubber hands feel touch, but not in blind individuals.
    Petkova VI; Zetterberg H; Ehrsson HH
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e35912. PubMed ID: 22558268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are blind individuals immune to bodily illusions? Somatic rubber hand illusion in the blind revisited.
    Radziun D; Korczyk M; Szwed M; Ehrsson HH
    Behav Brain Res; 2024 Mar; 460():114818. PubMed ID: 38135190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Crossing the hands increases illusory self-touch.
    Pozeg P; Rognini G; Salomon R; Blanke O
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94008. PubMed ID: 24699795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Explaining away the body: experiences of supernaturally caused touch and touch on non-hand objects within the rubber hand illusion.
    Hohwy J; Paton B
    PLoS One; 2010 Feb; 5(2):e9416. PubMed ID: 20195378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Synchronous motor imagery and visual feedback of finger movement elicit the moving rubber hand illusion, at least in illusion-susceptible individuals.
    Berger CC; Coppi S; Ehrsson HH
    Exp Brain Res; 2023 Apr; 241(4):1021-1039. PubMed ID: 36928694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Visual capture of action, experience of ownership, and the illusion of self-touch: a new rubber hand paradigm.
    Aimola Davies AM; White RC; Thew G; Aimola NM; Davies M
    Perception; 2010; 39(6):830-8. PubMed ID: 20698477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Tactile expectations and the perception of self-touch: an investigation using the rubber hand paradigm.
    White RC; Aimola Davies AM; Halleen TJ; Davies M
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Jun; 19(2):505-19. PubMed ID: 20185337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the posterior parietal cortex reduces the onset time to the rubber hand illusion and increases the body ownership.
    Lira M; Pantaleão FN; de Souza Ramos CG; Boggio PS
    Exp Brain Res; 2018 Nov; 236(11):2935-2943. PubMed ID: 30084055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Touching a rubber hand: feeling of body ownership is associated with activity in multisensory brain areas.
    Ehrsson HH; Holmes NP; Passingham RE
    J Neurosci; 2005 Nov; 25(45):10564-73. PubMed ID: 16280594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Causal Inference of Body Ownership in the Posterior Parietal Cortex.
    Chancel M; Iriye H; Ehrsson HH
    J Neurosci; 2022 Sep; 42(37):7131-7143. PubMed ID: 35940875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vestibular contributions to a right-hemisphere network for bodily awareness: combining galvanic vestibular stimulation and the "Rubber Hand Illusion".
    Ferrè ER; Berlot E; Haggard P
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Mar; 69():140-7. PubMed ID: 25619847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Spatial limits on the nonvisual self-touch illusion and the visual rubber hand illusion: subjective experience of the illusion and proprioceptive drift.
    Aimola Davies AM; White RC; Davies M
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Jun; 22(2):613-36. PubMed ID: 23644413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rubber hands in space: the role of distance and relative position in the rubber hand illusion.
    Kalckert A; Perera AT; Ganesan Y; Tan E
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Jul; 237(7):1821-1832. PubMed ID: 31079236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Application of the rubber hand illusion paradigm: comparison between upper and lower limbs.
    Flögel M; Kalveram KT; Christ O; Vogt J
    Psychol Res; 2016 Mar; 80(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 25656162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A sensational illusion: vision-touch synaesthesia and the rubber hand paradigm.
    Aimola Davies AM; White RC
    Cortex; 2013 Mar; 49(3):806-18. PubMed ID: 22445446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Both developmental and adult vision shape body representations.
    Nava E; Steiger T; Röder B
    Sci Rep; 2014 Oct; 4():6622. PubMed ID: 25338780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sleep dissolves illusion: sleep withstands learning of visuo-tactile-proprioceptive integration induced by repeated days of rubber hand illusion training.
    Honma M; Yoshiike T; Ikeda H; Kim Y; Kuriyama K
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85734. PubMed ID: 24465671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Balancing body ownership: Visual capture of proprioception and affectivity during vestibular stimulation.
    Ponzo S; Kirsch LP; Fotopoulou A; Jenkinson PM
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Aug; 117():311-321. PubMed ID: 29940194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Handedness modulates proprioceptive drift in the rubber hand illusion.
    Dempsey-Jones H; Kritikos A
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Feb; 237(2):351-361. PubMed ID: 30411222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Rubber Hand Illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand.
    Rohde M; Di Luca M; Ernst MO
    PLoS One; 2011; 6(6):e21659. PubMed ID: 21738756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.