These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22558497)

  • 1. Comparison of loss of resistance technique between Epidrum® and conventional method for identifying the epidural space.
    Kim SW; Kim YM; Kim SH; Chung MH; Choi YR; Choi EM
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2012 Apr; 62(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 22558497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Epidrum, Epi-Jet, and Loss of Resistance syringe techniques for identifying the epidural space in obstetric patients.
    Kartal S; Kösem B; Kılınç H; Köşker H; Karabayırlı S; Çimen NK; Demircioğlu RI
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Aug; 20(8):992-997. PubMed ID: 28891544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Epidrum(®): a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle.
    Sawada A; Kii N; Yoshikawa Y; Yamakage M
    J Anesth; 2012 Apr; 26(2):292-5. PubMed ID: 22081113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. False Loss of Resistance in Cervical Epidural Injection: The Loss of Resistance Technique Compared with the Epidrum Guidance in Locating Epidural Space.
    Lee JY; Lee SM; Sim WS; Ahn HJ; Park MH; Lim HY; Lee SH; Kim YR; Kim YI; Bang YJ
    Pain Physician; 2016 Mar; 19(3):131-8. PubMed ID: 27008286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Usefulness of Epidrum for teaching identification of the epidural space].
    Hirabayashi T; Kawamata T; Sakamoto A; Ikeno S; Minemura H; Ide S; Kurato T; Kawamata M
    Masui; 2011 Sep; 60(9):1078-81. PubMed ID: 21950041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A randomised controlled trial using the Epidrum for labour epidurals.
    Deighan M; Briain DO; Shakeban H; O'Flaherty D; Abdulla H; Al-Jourany A; Ash S; Ahmed S; McMorrow R
    Ir Med J; 2015 Mar; 108(3):73-5. PubMed ID: 25876297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Commonly-used versus less commonly-used methods in the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Carvalho LP; Agarwal A; Kashiwagi FT; Corrêa I; Pereira JE; El Dib R
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 May; 38():41-51. PubMed ID: 28372676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of electrical stimulation on epidural anesthesia for cesarean section: a randomized controlled trial.
    Kim YS; Kim HS; Jeong H; Lee CH; Lee MK; Choi SS
    BMC Anesthesiol; 2020 Jun; 20(1):146. PubMed ID: 32522156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic puncture assist device™ versus conventional loss of resistance technique for thoracic paravertebral space identification: Clinical and ultrasound evaluation.
    Ali MA; Abdellatif AA
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2017; 11(1):32-36. PubMed ID: 28217050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acoustic puncture assist device: A novel technique to identify the epidural space.
    Al-Mokaddam MA; Al-Harbi MK; El-Jandali ST; Al-Zahrani TA
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2016; 10(2):179-81. PubMed ID: 27051369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identification of cervical epidural space: A comparison study between contrast spread and loss of resistance techniques.
    Perper Y
    Front Pain Res (Lausanne); 2022; 3():1000209. PubMed ID: 36618582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Identification of the epidural space: usual practice among Spanish anesthesiologists].
    Figueredo E; Blanque R; García Villalba FJ; De Andrés J
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2005 Nov; 52(9):521-8. PubMed ID: 16363296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loss of resistance to normal saline is preferred to identify the epidural space: a survey of Canadian pediatric anesthesiologists.
    Ames WA; Hayes JA; Pétroz GC; Roy WL
    Can J Anaesth; 2005; 52(6):607-12. PubMed ID: 15983146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Drip infusion method as a useful indicator for identification of the epidural space.
    Ok SY; Ryoo SH; Baek YH; Kim SH; Kim SI; Kim SC; Park W; Song D
    Korean J Anesthesiol; 2009 Aug; 57(2):181-184. PubMed ID: 30625854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Randomized Comparison Between Conventional and Waveform-Confirmed Loss of Resistance for Thoracic Epidural Blocks.
    Arnuntasupakul V; Van Zundert TC; Vijitpavan A; Aliste J; Engsusophon P; Leurcharusmee P; Ah-Kye S; Finlayson RJ; Tran DQ
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2016; 41(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 26894628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of spring-loaded, loss of resistance and hanging drop techniques in lumbar epidural blocks.
    Gülen G; Akkaya T; Ozkan D; Kaydul M; Gözaydin O; Gümüş H
    Agri; 2012; 24(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 22399127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Development of a Novel Device Based on Loss of Guidewire Resistance to Identify Epidural Space in a Porcine Model.
    Yang J; Choi R; Cho K; Kim S; Lee B; Lee K; Kim D; Lee J
    J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():8899628. PubMed ID: 32908659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Randomized comparison of two methods of the epidural space identification during regional labour analgesia.
    Duniec L; Bilawicz J; Chlebus M; Pietrzak B; Wielgos M
    Ginekol Pol; 2019; 90(5):279-284. PubMed ID: 30984999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of epidural space using loss of resistance syringe, infusion drip, and balloon technique: A comparative study.
    Singhal S; Bala M; Kaur K
    Saudi J Anaesth; 2014 Nov; 8(Suppl 1):S41-5. PubMed ID: 25538520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Techniques for identifying the epidural space].
    Figueredo E
    Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim; 2005; 52(7):401-12. PubMed ID: 16200920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.