These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22558659)

  • 1. Extraterritorial laws for cross-border reproductive care: the issue of legal diversity.
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):187-200. PubMed ID: 22558659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extraterritoriality for cross-border reproductive care: should states act against citizens travelling abroad for illegal infertility treatment?
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):546-54. PubMed ID: 21955486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The pluralism problem in cross-border reproductive care.
    Storrow RF
    Hum Reprod; 2010 Dec; 25(12):2939-43. PubMed ID: 20940141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The consequences of S.H. and Others v. Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments.
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 23063819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is Europe 'giving in to baby markets?' Reproductive tourism in Europe and the gradual erosion of existing legal limits to reproductive markets.
    Van Beers BC
    Med Law Rev; 2015; 23(1):103-34. PubMed ID: 24866180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assisted reproduction on treacherous terrain: the legal hazards of cross-border reproductive travel.
    Storrow RF
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):538-45. PubMed ID: 21962773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cross-border reproductive care for law evasion: should physicians be allowed to help infertility patients evade the law of their own country?
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G; De Sutter P
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Jul; 202():101-5. PubMed ID: 26372639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Access to medical-assisted reproduction and pgd in Italian law: a deadly blow to an illiberal statute? commentary to the European Court on Human Rights's decision Costa and Pavan v Italy (ECtHR, 28 August 2012, App. 54270/2010).
    Biondi S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(3):474-86. PubMed ID: 23552505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Judicial review of restrictions on gamete donation in Europe.
    Storrow RF
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):655-9. PubMed ID: 23084881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Circumvention tourism.
    Cohen G
    Cornell Law Rev; 2012 Sep; 97(6):1309-98. PubMed ID: 23072007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Welcome to the wild west: protecting access to cross border fertility care in the United States.
    Mutcherson KM
    Cornell J Law Public Policy; 2012; 22(2):349-393.. PubMed ID: 25330565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Abandoned by the State, betrayed by the Church: Italian experiences of cross-border reproductive care.
    Zanini G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):565-72. PubMed ID: 21955488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Legal harmonization and reproductive tourism in Europe.
    Pennings G
    Hum Reprod; 2004 Dec; 19(12):2689-94. PubMed ID: 15513984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Legal perspectives on cross-border reproductive care.
    Crockin SL
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Dec; 23(7):811-3. PubMed ID: 22056635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Legal and ethical issues in cross-border gestational surrogacy.
    Igareda González N
    Fertil Steril; 2020 May; 113(5):916-919. PubMed ID: 32327242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new approach to sex-based classifications in the context of procreative rights: S.H. & Others V. Austria in context.
    Sanderson M
    Eur J Health Law; 2013 Mar; 20(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 23544315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assisted reproductive technologies: the problems of legal enforcement.
    Pashkov V; Lyfar A
    Wiad Lek; 2018; 71(5):1066-1070. PubMed ID: 30176642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Banning reproductive travel: Turkey's ART legislation and third-party assisted reproduction.
    Gürtin ZB
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2011 Nov; 23(5):555-64. PubMed ID: 21962527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in south American countries: pointing to a need for an international legal framework.
    Torres G; Shapiro A; Mackey TK
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):46. PubMed ID: 30691390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What is the Responsibility of Australian Medical Professionals Whose Patients Travel Abroad for Assisted Reproduction?
    Millbank J
    Med Law Rev; 2019 Aug; 27(3):365-389. PubMed ID: 30690476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.