These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22558661)

  • 1. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2012/6. Case of S.H. and others v. Austria, 3 November 2011, no. 57813/00 (Grand Chamber).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):206-11. PubMed ID: 22558661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2010/12 Case of S.H. and others v. Austria, 1 April 2010, no. 57813/00 (First Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2010 Jun; 17(3):307-13. PubMed ID: 20666293
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. In vitro fertilisation and the limits of consent.
    Freckelton I
    J Law Med; 2007 Feb; 14(3):319-25. PubMed ID: 17355096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new approach to sex-based classifications in the context of procreative rights: S.H. & Others V. Austria in context.
    Sanderson M
    Eur J Health Law; 2013 Mar; 20(1):21-40. PubMed ID: 23544315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2005/15 Case of Maurice v. France, 6 October 2005, no. 11810/03 (Grand Chamber).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2005 Dec; 12(4):403-10. PubMed ID: 16454369
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. European court of human rights. ECHR 2008/6 Case of Dickson v. The United Kingdom, 4 December 2007, no. 44362/04 (Grand Chamber).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2008 Jul; 15(2):207-11. PubMed ID: 18988602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2008/13 case of N. v. The United Kingdom, 27 May 2008, no. 26565/05 (Grand Chamber).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2008 Dec; 15(4):421-6. PubMed ID: 19180981
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The consequences of S.H. and Others v. Austria for legislation on gamete donation in Europe: an ethical analysis of the European Court of Human Rights judgments.
    Van Hoof W; Pennings G
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2012 Dec; 25(7):665-9. PubMed ID: 23063819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health, human rights and the regulation of reproductive technologies in S.H. And others V Austria (application no. 57813/00).
    McGuinness S
    Med Law Rev; 2013; 21(1):146-60. PubMed ID: 23420774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Costa Rica's absolute ban on in vitro fertilization deemed a human rights violation: implications for U.S. assisted reproductive technology policy and "personhood" initiatives.
    Crockin SL; Ribas D; Escalante G; Nussbaum L; Jones HW
    Fertil Steril; 2013 Aug; 100(2):330-3. PubMed ID: 23725805
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2013/9 Case of Costa and Pavan v. Italy, 28 August 2012, no. 54270/10 (Second Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2013 Jun; 20(3):315-6. PubMed ID: 23984496
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. European Court of Human Rights: ECHR 2012/4 Case of X and Y v. Croatia, 3 November 2011, no. 5193/09 (First Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Mar; 19(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 22428394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [On the Decision of the European Court of Human Rights. The S.H. and others against Austria. TEDH 2010/56 of April 1, on human assisted reproduction and its incidence on the European legislative arena].
    Vidal Martínez J
    Rev Derecho Genoma Hum; 2011; (34):155-201. PubMed ID: 22977960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2009/3 case of Gulub Atanasov v. Bulgaria, 6 November 2008, no. 73281/01 (fifth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2009 Mar; 16(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 19353916
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A human right to reproduce non-coitally? A comment on the Austrian Constitutional Court's judgment of 14 October 1999.
    Bernat E
    Univ Tasman Law Rev; 2002; 21(1):20-38. PubMed ID: 15214357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Human rights to in vitro fertilization.
    Zegers-Hochschild F; Dickens BM; Dughman-Manzur S
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 123(1):86-9. PubMed ID: 23932062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2014/5 Case of Glien v. Germany, 28 November 2013, no. 7345/12 (fifth section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2014 Apr; 21(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 24851654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2012/7. Case of Makharadze and Sikharulidze v. Georgia, 22 November 2011, no. 35254/07 (Third Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2012 Apr; 19(2):211-4. PubMed ID: 22558662
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. European Court of Human Rights. ECHR 2016/17 Case of Blokhin v. Russia, 23 March 2016, no. 47152/06 (Grand Chamber).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2016 Jun; 23(3):314-7. PubMed ID: 27491254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. European court of human rights. ECHR 2007/7 Case of Istratii and others v. Moldova, 27 March 2007, no. 8721/05, 8705/05 and 8742/05 (Fourth Section).
    Dute J
    Eur J Health Law; 2007 Jul; 14(2):206-8. PubMed ID: 17847837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.