These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22558837)

  • 1. Comparison of ISO standard and TKR patient axial force profiles during the stance phase of gait.
    Lundberg HJ; Ngai V; Wimmer MA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2012 Mar; 226(3):227-34. PubMed ID: 22558837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Kinematic evaluation of cruciate-retaining total knee replacement patients during level walking: a comparison with the displacement-controlled ISO standard.
    Ngai V; Wimmer MA
    J Biomech; 2009 Oct; 42(14):2363-8. PubMed ID: 19651410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding the differences in wear testing method standards for total knee replacement.
    Abdelgaied A; Fisher J; Jennings LM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Aug; 132():105258. PubMed ID: 35609424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In-vivo kinematics of knee prostheses patients during level walking compared with the ISO force-controlled simulator standard.
    Ngai V; Schwenke T; Wimmer MA
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Oct; 223(7):889-96. PubMed ID: 19908427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How Does Wear Rate Compare in Well-functioning Total Hip and Knee Replacements? A Postmortem Polyethylene Liner Study.
    Pourzal R; Knowlton CB; Hall DJ; Laurent MP; Urban RM; Wimmer MA
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Aug; 474(8):1867-75. PubMed ID: 26891896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro response of the natural cadaver knee to the loading profiles specified in a standard for knee implant wear testing.
    Sutton LG; Werner FW; Haider H; Hamblin T; Clabeaux JJ
    J Biomech; 2010 Aug; 43(11):2203-7. PubMed ID: 20451913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitivity of total knee replacement wear to variability in motion and load input: A parametric finite element analysis study.
    Mell SP; Wimmer MA; Lundberg HJ
    J Orthop Res; 2020 Jul; 38(7):1538-1549. PubMed ID: 32458460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of variations in input directions according to ISO 14243 on wearing of knee prostheses.
    Wang XH; Zhang W; Song DY; Li H; Dong X; Zhang M; Zhao F; Jin ZM; Cheng CK
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(10):e0206496. PubMed ID: 30372460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of limb alignment on mediolateral loading in total knee replacement: in vivo measurements in five patients.
    Halder A; Kutzner I; Graichen F; Heinlein B; Beier A; Bergmann G
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 Jun; 94(11):1023-9. PubMed ID: 22637208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prosthesis alignment affects axial rotation motion after total knee replacement: a prospective in vivo study combining computed tomography and fluoroscopic evaluations.
    Harman MK; Banks SA; Kirschner S; Lützner J
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2012 Oct; 13():206. PubMed ID: 23088451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Backside wear of modular ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene tibial inserts.
    Conditt MA; Ismaily SK; Alexander JW; Noble PC
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2004 May; 86(5):1031-7. PubMed ID: 15118049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tractive forces during rolling motion of the knee: implications for wear in total knee replacement.
    Wimmer MA; Andriacchi TP
    J Biomech; 1997 Feb; 30(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 9001933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A direct comparison of patient and force-controlled simulator total knee replacement kinematics.
    DesJardins JD; Banks SA; Benson LC; Pace T; LaBerge M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(15):3458-66. PubMed ID: 17628569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of surgical alignment and soft tissue conditions on the kinematics and wear of a fixed bearing total knee replacement.
    Johnston H; Abdelgaied A; Pandit H; Fisher J; Jennings LM
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2019 Dec; 100():103386. PubMed ID: 31408775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fluid composition impacts standardized testing protocols in ultrahigh molecular weight polyethylene knee wear testing.
    Schwenke T; Kaddick C; Schneider E; Wimmer MA;
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2005 Nov; 219(6):457-64. PubMed ID: 16312105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of ISO 14243-1 to ASTM F3141 in terms of wearing of knee prostheses.
    Wang XH; Li H; Dong X; Zhao F; Cheng CK
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2019 Mar; 63():34-40. PubMed ID: 30802769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro effects on mobile polyethylene insert under highly demanding daily activities: stair climbing.
    Jaber SA; Taddei P; Tozzi S; Sudanese A; Affatato S
    Int Orthop; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1433-40. PubMed ID: 25500956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The biomechanics of a validated finite element model of stress shielding in a novel hybrid total knee replacement.
    Bougherara H; Zdero R; Mahboob Z; Dubov A; Shah S; Schemitsch EH
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2010 Oct; 224(10):1209-19. PubMed ID: 21138239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The choice of the femoral center of rotation affects material loss in total knee replacement wear testing - A parametric finite element study of ISO 14243-3.
    Mell SP; Wimmer MA; Lundberg HJ
    J Biomech; 2019 May; 88():104-112. PubMed ID: 30940359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of long-term numerical and experimental total knee replacement wear during simulated gait loading.
    Knight LA; Pal S; Coleman JC; Bronson F; Haider H; Levine DL; Taylor M; Rullkoetter PJ
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1550-8. PubMed ID: 17084405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.