196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 22559377)
1. Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing.
Visram AS; Azadpour M; Kluk K; McKay CM
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4042-50. PubMed ID: 22559377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fundamental frequency is critical to speech perception in noise in combined acoustic and electric hearing.
Carroll J; Tiaden S; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2054-62. PubMed ID: 21973360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does acoustic fundamental frequency information enhance cochlear implant performance?
Mulhern L; Cullington H
Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24597637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Achieving electric-acoustic benefit with a modulated tone.
Brown CA; Bacon SP
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 19546806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing.
Williges B; Dietz M; Hohmann V; Jürgens T
Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech.
Ananthakrishnan S; Luo X; Krishnan A
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation].
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing.
Souza P; Arehart K; Miller CW; Muralimanohar RK
Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20739892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robustness against distortion of fundamental frequency cues in simulated electro-acoustic hearing.
Vermeulen A; Verschuur C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):229. PubMed ID: 27475149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of frequency compression by cochlear implant recipients with postoperative acoustic hearing.
McDermott H; Henshall K
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jun; 21(6):380-9. PubMed ID: 20701835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Noise susceptibility of cochlear implant users: the role of spectral resolution and smearing.
Fu QJ; Nogaki G
J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2005 Mar; 6(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 15735937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors Affecting Bimodal Benefit in Pediatric Mandarin-Speaking Chinese Cochlear Implant Users.
Liu YW; Tao DD; Chen B; Cheng X; Shu Y; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1316-1327. PubMed ID: 30882534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Benefits of bilateral electrical stimulation with the nucleus cochlear implant in adults: 6-month postoperative results.
Laszig R; Aschendorff A; Stecker M; Müller-Deile J; Maune S; Dillier N; Weber B; Hey M; Begall K; Lenarz T; Battmer RD; Böhm M; Steffens T; Strutz J; Linder T; Probst R; Allum J; Westhofen M; Doering W
Otol Neurotol; 2004 Nov; 25(6):958-68. PubMed ID: 15547426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Speech perception with music maskers by cochlear implant users and normal-hearing listeners.
Eskridge EN; Galvin JJ; Aronoff JM; Li T; Fu QJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Jun; 55(3):800-10. PubMed ID: 22223890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Interaction between electric and acoustic cues in diotic condition for speech perception in quiet and noise by cochlear implantees.
Richard C; Ferrary E; Borel S; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jan; 33(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 22158018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mandarin speech perception in combined electric and acoustic stimulation.
Li Y; Zhang G; Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112471. PubMed ID: 25386962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
